Somatic and psychological models of common mental disorder in primary care in India

1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. PATEL ◽  
J. PEREIRA ◽  
A. H. MANN
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Common Mental Disorder ◽  
Somatic Symptoms ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Psychiatric Interview ◽  
Practical Advantage ◽  
Psychological Models

Background. Primary care attenders with a common mental disorder (CMD) frequently present with somatic symptoms. This study aimed to examine somatic and psychological models of CMD in primary care attenders in India.Methods. Cross-sectional survey of attenders at two primary care clinics. Psychiatric caseness was determined on three criteria: standardized psychiatric interview (biomedical criterion), patients' self-assessment of emotional disorder (emic criterion) and health care provider diagnosis. The GHQ-12 and the PPQ, which emphasize psychological and somatic symptoms respectively, were used as screening instruments.Results. Although somatic symptoms were the presenting complaints for 97% of subjects, 51% of subjects with a biomedically defined CMD had a psychological illness attribution. Patients with psychological attributions were more likely to be women, to have a longer duration of illness, to have higher CISR scores and were more likely to be recognized by the primary health care (PHC) physician. The GHQ-12 was superior to the PPQ in identifying cases of CMD against the biomedical criterion for both psychologizers and somatizers; both instruments performed equally well against the emic and care provider criteria.Conclusions. Psychological models may be acquired by patients as CMD becomes more chronic or severe, making them more likely to be detected by PHC physicians. Psychological symptoms are superior to somatic symptoms in detecting CMD. Shorter versions of the GHQ have comparable discriminating abilities to the 12-item version and offer the practical advantage of brevity, which may make them more acceptable to PHC physicians as a clinical screening tool.

scholarly journals Integration of mental health care into primary care

2000 ◽  
Vol 176 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Chisholm ◽  
S. James ◽  
K. Sekar ◽  
K. Kishore Kumar ◽  
R. Srinivasa Murthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Common Mental Disorder ◽  
Low Income Countries

BackgroundTargeting resources on cost-effective care strategies is important for the global mental health burden.AimsTo demonstrate cost–outcome methods in the evaluation of mental health care programmes in low-income countries.MethodFour rural populations were screened for psychiatric morbidity. Individuals with a diagnosed common mental disorder were invited to seek treatment, and assessed prospectively on symptoms, disability, quality of life and resource use.ResultsBetween 12% and 39% of the four screened populations had a diagnosable common mental disorder. In three of the four localities there were improvements over time in symptoms, disability and quality of life, while total economic costs were reduced.ConclusionEconomic analysis of mental health care in low-income countries is feasible and practicable. Our assessment of the cost-effectiveness of integrating mental health into primary care was confounded by the naturalistic study design and the low proportion of subjects using government primary health care services.

scholarly journals Common Mental Disorder Symptoms among Patients with Malaria Attending Primary Care in Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Survey

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e108923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markos Tesfaye ◽  
Charlotte Hanlon ◽  
Fasil Tessema ◽  
Martin Prince ◽  
Atalay Alem
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Common Mental Disorder ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Integrating Genomic Screening into Primary Care: Provider Experiences Caring for Latino Patients at a Community-Based Health Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272110002
Author(s):  
Tarika Srinivasan ◽  
Erica J. Sutton ◽  
Annika T. Beck ◽  
Idali Cuellar ◽  
Valentina Hernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Genomic Sequencing ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Genomic Screening

Introduction: Minority communities have had limited access to advances in genomic medicine. Mayo Clinic and Mountain Park Health Center, a Federally Qualified Health Center in Phoenix, Arizona, partnered to assess the feasibility of offering genomic screening to Latino patients receiving care at a community-based health center. We examined primary care provider (PCP) experiences reporting genomic screening results and integrating those results into patient care. Methods: We conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with PCPs and other members of the health care team charged with supporting patients who received positive genomic screening results. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Results: Of the 500 patients who pursued genomic screening, 10 received results indicating a genetic variant that warranted clinical management. PCPs felt genomic screening was valuable to patients and their families, and that genomic research should strive to include underrepresented minorities. Providers identified multiple challenges integrating genomic sequencing into patient care, including difficulties maintaining patient contact over time; arranging follow-up medical care; and managing results in an environment with limited genetics expertise. Providers also reflected on the ethics of offering genomic sequencing to patients who may not be able to pursue diagnostic testing or follow-up care due to financial constraints. Conclusions: Our results highlight the potential benefits and challenges of bringing advances in precision medicine to community-based health centers serving under-resourced populations. By proactively considering patient support needs, and identifying financial assistance programs and patient-referral mechanisms to support patients who may need specialized medical care, PCPs and other health care providers can help to ensure that precision medicine lives up to its full potential as a tool for improving patient care.

The phenomenology and explanatory models of common mental disorder: a study in primary care in Harare, Zimbabwe

1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1191-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Patel ◽  
F. Gwanzura ◽  
E. Simunyu ◽  
K. Lloyd ◽  
A. Mann
Keyword(s):  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Traditional Healer ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Common Mental Disorder ◽  
Somatic Symptoms ◽  
Traditional Healers ◽  
Explanatory Models ◽  
Interview Schedule ◽  
Duration Of Illness ◽  
American Concept

synopsisIn order to describe the explanatory models and the etic and emic phenomena of common mental disorder in Harare, Zimbabwe, 110 subjects were selected by general nurses in three clinics and by four traditional healers from their current clients. The subjects were interviewed using the Explanatory Model Interview and the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule.Mental disorder most commonly presented with somatic symptoms, but few patients denied that their mind or soul was the source of illness. Spiritual factors were frequently cited as causes of mental illness. Subjects who were selected by traditional healer, reported a greater duration of illness and were more likely to provide a spiritual explanation for their illness.The majority of subjects were classified as ‘cases’ by the etic criteria of the CISR. Most patients, however, showed a mixture of psychiatric symptoms that did not fall clearly into a single diagnostic group. Patients from a subgroup with a spiritual model of illness were less likely to conform to etic criteria of ‘caseness’ and they may represent a unique category of psychological distress in Zimbabwe. A wide variety of emic phenomena were elicited that have been incorporated in an indigenous measure of non-psychotic mental disorder. Kufungisisa, or thinking too much, seemed to be the Shona term closest to the Euro-American concept of neurotic illness.

Primary Care Pediatrics and Child Psychopathology: A Review of Diagnostic, Treatment, and Referral Practices

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 1044-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Costello
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Problems ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Health Problems ◽  
Group Practices ◽  
Primary Care Pediatricians

The quality of mental health care for children depends not only on specialist mental health services, but also on how effectively primary care providers identify, treat, and refer children with emotional and behavioral problems. Recent research has shown that primary care practitioners are the sole providers of mental health care to the majority of people with a mental disorder. For example, Regier et al1 calculated that in 1975 54.1% of persons with a mental disorder were treated only in a primary care or outpatient medical setting, with another 6% receiving care from both specialist mental health and primary care medical facilities. An additional 21.5% were not in treatment or received treatment from nonmedical agencies. If the data were extrapolated for all age groups, these rates would imply that only one child in five with a mental disorder is receiving specialist treatment, three are in the care of a pediatrician, and one is receiving no treatment. This would lead to the conclusion that pediatricians are, according to Regier et al,1 the de facto mental health service for most children in need of such care. It would lend support to the drive to increase pediatricians' awareness of, and training for, the mental health component of their work.2 In this paper, we review the published evidence as it applies to children. SCOPE This review includes the published studies of mental health problems diagnosed by primary care pediatricians, family practitioners, or pediatric nurse practitioners working in outpatient settings in the United States. These include private pediatric practices, group practices, health maintenance organizations (HMOs), and other types of prepaid group practices. The questions addressed are: (1) What proportion of the children seen by primary care pediatricians and their colleagues are diagnosed by them as having a mental disorder? (2) What proportion of children are referred for specialist evaluation and treatment? (3) What risk factors are associated with a higher probability of receiving a diagnosis of psychopathology? (4) How accurate are primary care pediatricians' diagnoses of mental health problems?

scholarly journals Depression and experience of incarceration in North Central Nigeria: a situation analysis at Makurdi medium security prison

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emeka Nwefoh ◽  
Chinyere M. Aguocha ◽  
Grace Ryan ◽  
Philip Ode ◽  
Festus O. Ighagbon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Prison Inmates ◽  
Physical And Mental Health ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Medium Security

Abstract Background Human rights watchdogs have described conditions in Nigerian correctional facilities and detention centers as damaging to the physical and mental health of inmates. While the prevalence of mental disorders is high, access to appropriate healthcare is grossly inadequate. Understanding the current state of prison inmates’ mental health and well-being is an essential first step to addressing this important issue. This study aims to document the mental health and experiences of incarceration of inmates of the largest medium security prison in Nigeria’s Benue State. Methods A cross-sectional survey and descriptive analysis was carried out with a random sample of 381 prison inmates of Benue State Makurdi Medium Security Prison. Survey tools included: (1) a structured questionnaire on participants’ experiences in prison, and (2) the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a screening tool for depression. Results Most participants were young men (95.5%, mean age 27.95) and had completed secondary school (63.5%). While prison authorities had identified only 27 participants as having a mental disorder, 144 (37.8%) screened positive for depression. Twenty six had received professional counseling while in prison. Of the six participants who were already taking a psychotropic medication at the time of imprisonment, four received medication after being imprisoned. Approximately half, (52%) of participants were dissatisfied with prison health care. Conclusions Despite the high prevalence of depression among prison inmates, few cases are detected and treated. Prison staff may not recognize depression as a mental disorder, and the mental health care available is generally poor. Inadequate mental health and social care not only affects prison inmates’ well-being, but may also impact recidivism and health outcomes upon release. Prison inmates should be screened routinely for depression and other less-commonly recognized mental health conditions, and appropriate treatment made available.

Patients who somatize in primary care: a longitudinal study of cognitive and social characteristics

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 937-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurence J. Kirmayer ◽  
James M. Robbins
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Depressive Symptomatology ◽  
Emotional Problem ◽  
Somatic Symptoms ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Sociodemographic Characteristics

SynopsisWe examined the cognitive and sociodemographic characteristics of patients making somatic presentations of depression and anxiety in primary care. Only 15% of patients with depressive symptomatology on self-report, and only 21 % of patients with current major depression or anxiety disorders on diagnostic interview, presented psychosocial symptoms to their GP. The remainder of patients with psychiatric distress presented exclusively somatic symptoms and were divided into three groups - initial, facultative and true somatizers - based on their willingness to offer or endorse a psychosocial cause for their symptoms. Somatizers did not differ markedly from psychologizers in sociodemographic characteristics except for a greater proportion of men among the true somatizers. Compared to psychologizers, somatizers reported lower levels of psychological distress, less introspectiveness and less worry about having an emotional problem. Somatizers were also less likely to attribute common somatic symptoms to psychological causes and more likely to endorse normalizing causes. In the 12 months following their initial visit, somatizers made less use of speciality mental health care and were less likely to present emotional problems to their GP. Somatizers were markedly less likely to talk about personal problems to their GP and reported themselves less likely to seek help for anxiety or sadness. Somatization represents a persistent pattern of illness behaviour in which mental health care is not sought despite easily elicited evidence of emotional distress. Somatization is not, however, associated with higher levels of medical health care utilization than that found among patients with frank depression or anxiety.

Prevalence of mental disorders in non-demented elderly people in primary care

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 757-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Baladón ◽  
Ana Fernández ◽  
Maria Rubio-Valera ◽  
Jorge Cuevas-Esteban ◽  
Diego J. Palao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Well Being ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Somatic Comorbidity ◽  
Axis I

ABSTRACTBackground:Mental disorders in the elderly are common, with a 12-month prevalence in the community ranging from 8.54% to 26.4%. Unfortunately, many mental disorders are unrecognized, untreated, and associated with poor health outcomes. The aim of this paper is to describe the prevalence of mental disorders in the elderly primary care (PC) population and its associated factors by age groups.Methods:Cross-sectional survey, conducted in 77 PC centers in Catalonia (Spain), 1,192 patients over 65 years old. The prevalence of mental disorders was assessed through face-to-face evaluations using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version (SCID-I-RV) and the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI); chronic physical conditions were noted using a checklist; and disability through the Sheehan Disability Scales (SDS).Results:Nearly 20% of participants had a mental disorder in the previous 12 months. Anxiety disorders were the most frequent, (10.9%) (95% CI = 8.2–14.4), followed by mood disorders (7.4%) (95% CI = 5.7–9.5). Being female, greater perceived stress and having mental health/emotional problems as the main reason for consultation were associated with the presence of any mental disorder. There were no differences in prevalence across age groups. Somatic comorbidity was not associated with the presence of mental disorders.Conclusions:Mental disorders are highly prevalent among the elderly in PC in Spain. Efforts are needed to develop strategies to reduce this prevalence and improve the well-being of the elderly. Based on our results, we thought it might be useful to assess perceived stress regularly in PC, focusing on people who consult for emotional distress, or that have greater perceived stress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document