A Proposal For A Nonreinstatement Rule In Unfair Labor Practice Cases Involving Patient Abuse

1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-341
Author(s):  
Clare T. Tully

AbstractNursing home discharges of employees based on patient abuse raise a difficult issue when the motivating factor for the disciplinary action is union activism. A tension is created between the rights of employees to engage in protected concerted activity and the rights of patients to quality care. In 1974, Congress passed the Health Care Institutions Amendments, which granted to non-profit health care workers collective organizing and bargaining rights substantially similar to those which workers in other industries had enjoyed for decades under the National Labor Relations Act. Congress intended to give health care workers only that degree of parity, however, which is compatible with the provision of high quality patient care. The agency charged with enforcing the Act, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), has failed to distinguish employee misconduct in industrial settings from patient abuse in health care institutions when fashioning remedies for discriminatorily discharged union activists. The NLRB typically has ordered the reinstatement, with back pay, of the patient abuser as the patient’s primary care-giver. This Article suggests that a front pay remedy is more appropriate to these cases because it protects the patient’s right to be free from abuse without sacrificing employee unionization rights.

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 756-762
Author(s):  
Dorit Rubinstein Reiss ◽  
V.B. Dubal

Influenza mandates in health care institutions are recommended by professional associations as an effective way to prevent the contraction of influenza by patients from health care workers. Health care institutions with such mandates must operate within civil rights frameworks. A recent set of cases against health care institutions with influenza mandates reveals the liabilities posed by federal law that protects employees from religious discrimination. This article examines this legal framework and draws important lessons from this litigation for health care institutions. We argue counterintuitively that providing religious exemptions from influenza mandates may expose health care institutions to more liability than not providing a formal exemption.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Monther A. Gharaibeh ◽  
Badera Al Mohammad ◽  
Besher Gharaibeh ◽  
Laith Khasawneh ◽  
Saeed Al Naser

Amid the current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), orthopaedic surgery was one of the fewer specialties that remained active managing emergent and urgent orthopaedic and trauma cases. On the other hand, with the continued spread of this pandemic and its associated socioeconomic confinement and unpredictability of the pandemic curve; many health care facilities were forced into halting all elective and non-urgent activities including orthopaedic specialties. This in part was to help in reallocation of required resources and focusing on the proper management of COVID-19 patients, and to prevent the transmission of infection among health care workers and patients. In this article we analyzed developments and recommendations of international reports about the current outbreak and its impact on the practice of orthopaedic surgery. Our aim was to provide comprehensive and easy guidelines for the management of urgent and emergent cases in hot zones and for the process of returning to usual orthopaedic work flow in a balanced strategy to assure safe practice and providing quality care without the risk of exhausting institutional resources or the risk of COVID- 19 transmission among health care workers or patients


2020 ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
O.I. Kyselova ◽  
K.O. Nadtochiy

The work of health care workers is associated with great physical and emotional stress, the need in some cases to work in difficult and life-threatening conditions. This determines some features of the legal regulation of labor relations in this area of activity: additional requirements when concluding an employment contract, preferential working hours and rest time, special rules for part-time work, etc. The specificity of the legal status of medical workers as subjects of labor law is due to both general rules and special regulations on various aspects of their activities. In addition to the general provisions of the Labor Code of Ukraine, the provisions of the law "Fundamentals of the legislation of Ukraine on health care", as well as a number of other regulations apply to medical workers who carry out professional activities. The article describes the regulations governing the employment of health workers, identifies the role of the employment contract in regulating their work, analyzes the features of the legal status of health workers as a subject of labor relations, and identifies a set of problems that arise in health care workers. in the performance of their duties. This topic is of interest not only from a scientific but also from a practical point of view, which necessitates detailed, thorough legal regulation of the work of medical workers and a more careful attitude of the legislator to this area. The urgency of the topic is due to the role of health professionals in the realization of the right of everyone to health care, guaranteed by Art. 49 of the Constitution of Ukraine.


Author(s):  
Guillaume Cambien ◽  
Jérémy Guihenneuc ◽  
Xavier Fouassin ◽  
Olivier Castel ◽  
Anne Bousseau ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In the COVID-19 pandemic context, a massive shortage of personal protective equipment occurred. To increase the available stocks, several countries appealed for donations from individuals or industries. While national and international standards to evaluate personal protective equipment exist, none of the previous research studied how to evaluate personal protective equipment coming from donations to healthcare establishments. Our aim was to evaluate the quality and possible use of the personal protective equipment donations delivered to our health care establishment in order to avoid a shortage and to protect health care workers throughout the COVID-19 crisis. Methods Our intervention focused on evaluation of the quality of donations for medical use through creation of a set of assessment criteria and analysis of the economic impact of these donations. Results Between 20th March 2020 and 11th May 2020, we received 239 donations including respirators, gloves, coveralls, face masks, gowns, hats, overshoes, alcohol-based hand rubs, face shields, goggles and aprons. A total of 448,666 (86.3%) products out of the 519,618 initially received were validated and distributed in health care units, equivalent to 126 (52.7%) donations out of the 239 received. The budgetary value of the validated donations was 32,872 euros according to the pre COVID-19 prices and 122,178 euros according to the current COVID-19 prices, representing an increase of 371.7%. Conclusions By ensuring a constant influx of personal protective equipment and proper stock management, shortages were avoided. Procurement and distribution of controlled and validated personal protective equipment is the key to providing quality care while guaranteeing health care worker safety.


2021 ◽  
pp. 108-138
Author(s):  
Jozo Čizmić ◽  

When talking about responsibility in health care, first of all, it refers to the responsibility of health care institutions and health care workers, in regards to the harm they have caused their patients through malpractice, as well as to the insurance against liability of health care workers for any mistakes in their work. An equally important area of responsibility is responsibilities of patients for their actions or omissions. In the paper, the author has classified these through four segments: patient responsibility for their health; patient responsibility to other patients; patient responsibility to healthcare professionals; and patient responsibility to the community. Patients’ rights in the Republic of Croatia are regulated by the Law on the Protection of Patients' Rights and the Law on Health Care, in a way, in which they prescribe only the rights of patients and, above all, the obligations and responsibilities of patients. Therefore, house rules of hospitals are the only regulations that systematically regulate patients' obligations and responsibilities, most of all or only those who are hospitalized in stationary healthcare institution.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Lipscomb ◽  
Jeanne Geiger-Brown ◽  
Katherine McPhaul ◽  
Karen Calabro

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika L. Sabbath ◽  
Cassandra Okechukwu ◽  
David Hurtado ◽  
Glorian Sorensen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document