Note on the velocity distribution in the wake behind a flat plate placed along the stream

1936 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Rosenhead ◽  
J. H. Simpson

1. The velocity distribution in fluid of small viscosity, or at large Reynolds number, in the laminar boundary layer associated with a thin flat plate along the main direction of flow, has been worked out by Blasius on the basis of the Prandtl theory. These original investigations covered the region from the forward edge of the plate to the downstream edge. In a recent paper Goldstein investigated the velocity distribution in the wake immediately behind the downstream edge over a region within about 0·5lfrom it,lbeing the length of the plate. LaterTollmien obtained a first approximation to the flow at a great distance down-stream. Goldstein § extended Tollmien's solution by finding a second approximation and by joining it up with his previous work on the flow very near the plate.

1966 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. Sears

This study of the boundary layer of steady, incompressible, plane, crossed-fields m.h.d. flow at large Reynolds numberReand magnetic Reynolds numberRmbegins with a review of Hartmann's case, where a boundary layer occurs whose thickness is proportional to (Re Rm)−½. Following this clue, it is shown that in general the boundary layer is a ‘local Hartmann boundary layer’. Its profiles are always exponential and it is determined completely by local quantities. The skin friction and the total electric current in the layer are proportional to the square root of the magnetic Prandtl number, i.e. to (Rm/Re)½. Thus the exterior-flow problem, the solution of which precedes a boundary-layer solution, generally involves a current sheet at the fluid-solid interface.This inviscid-flow problem becomes tractable if (Rm/Re)½is small enough to permit a linearized solution. The flow field about a flat plate at zero incidence is calculated in this approximation. It is pointed out that the thin-cylinder solutions of Sears & Resler (1959), which pertain toRm/Re= 0, can immediately be extended to small, non-zero values of this parameter by linear combination with this flat-plate solution.


1935 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. A21-A27
Author(s):  
Th. von Kármán ◽  
Clark B. Millikan

Abstract In the present paper the application of a laminar boundary-layer theory, previously developed by the authors, to the problem of the maximum-lift coefficient of airfoils is discussed. The calculations are carried through in detail for a first approximation, called a single-roof profile, to the potential velocity distribution over the upper surface of an airfoil. The results indicate a large variation in Clmax with turbulence but the quantitative dependence on Reynolds’ number and turbulence is not satisfactory. The calculations are then repeated for a so-called double-roof profile which approximates to the flow over the upper surface of an N.A.C.A. 2412 airfoil. These results are compared with those obtained from an experimental investigation on the same airfoil. The agreement is considered to indicate that for moderate values of R and Clmax the phenomenon of the maximum-lift coefficient is controlled by a contest between the separation and transition points of the laminar boundary layer over the nose of the airfoil. The difficulties involved in extending the theory to larger values of R, or to airfoils whose Cl vs. α curves are not approximately linear up to the stall, are mentioned.


1960 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iam Proudman

The purpose of this note is to describe a particular class of steady fluid flows, for which the techniques of classical hydrodynamics and boundary-layer theory determine uniquely the asymptotic flow for large Reynolds number for each of a continuously varied set of boundary conditions. The flows involve viscous layers in the interior of the flow domain, as well as boundary layers, and the investigation is unusual in that the position and structure of all the viscous layers are determined uniquely. The note is intended to be an illustration of the principles that lead to this determination, not a source of information of practical value.The flows take place in a two-dimensional channel with porous walls through which fluid is uniformly injected or extracted. When fluid is extracted through both walls there are boundary layers on both walls and the flow outside these layers is irrotational. When fluid is extracted through one wall and injected through the other, there is a boundary layer only on the former wall and the inviscid rotational flow outside this layer satisfies the no-slip condition on the other wall. When fluid is injected through both walls there are no boundary layers, but there is a viscous layer in the interior of the channel, across which the second derivative of the tangential velocity is discontinous, and the position of this layer is determined by the requirement that the inviscid rotational flows on either side of it must satisfy the no-slip conditions on the walls.


1983 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 163-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Vorus

This paper proposes a high-Reynolds-number theory for the approximate analysis of timewise steady viscous flows. Its distinguishing feature is linearity. But it differs fundamentally from Oseen's (1910) well-known linear theory. Oseen flow is a variation on Stokes flow at the low-Reynolds-number limit.The theory is developed for a %dimensional body moving through an infinite incompressible fluid. The velocity-vorticity formulation is employed. A boundary integral expressing the body contour velocity is written in terms of Green functions of the approximate governing differential equations. The boundary integral contains three unknown boundary distributions. These are a velocity source density, the boundary vorticity, and the normal gradient of the boundary vorticity. The unknown distributions are determined as the solutions to a boundary-integral equation formed from the velocity integral by the prescription of zero relative fluid velocity on the body boundary.The linear integral-equation formulation is applied specifically to the case of thin bodies, such that the boundary condition is satisfied approximately on the streamwise coordinate axis. The integral equation is then reduced to its leading-order contribution in the limit of infinite Reynolds number. The unknown distributions uncouple in the first-order formulation, and analytic solutions are obtained. A most interesting result appears at this point: the theory recovers linearized airfoil theory in the first-order infinite-Reynolds-number limit; the airfoil integral equation determines one of the three contour distributions sought.The first-order theory is then demonstrated by application to two classical cases: the zero-thickness flat plate at zero incidence, and the circular cylinder.For the flat plate, the streamwise velocity near the plate predicted by the proposed linear theory is compared with that of Blasius's solution to the laminar boundary-layer equations (Schlichting 1968). The linear theory predicts a fuller profile, tending more toward the character expected of the timewise steady turbulent profile. This character is also exhibited in the predicted velocity distribution across the plate wake, which is compared with Goldstein's asymptotic boundary-layer solution (Schlichting 1968). The wake defect is more severe according to the proposed theory.For the case of the circular cylinder, application of the formulation is not truly valid, since the circular cylinder is not a thin body. The theory does, however, predict that the flow separates. The separation points are predicted to lie at position angles of approximately ± 135°, with angle measured from the forward stagnation point. This compares with the prediction of 109O from the Blasius series solution to the laminar boundary-layer equations (Schlichting 1968).The theory is next applied to the case of a non-zero-thickness flat plate with incidence. From the fully attached flow at zero incidence, the theory predicts that both Ieading-edge separation and reattachment and trailing-edge separation appear on the suction side at small angle. On increasing incidence, the forward reattachment point moves aft, and the aft separation point moves forward. Coalescence occurs near midchord, and the foil is thereafter fully separated.Finally, the first-order contribution to the far-field velocity at high Reynolds number is shown to be identically that corresponding to the ideal flow. This result, coupled with the recovery of linearized thin-foil theory in the near-field limit, is argued to support strongly the physical idea that the ideal flow is, in fact, the limiting state of the complete field flow at infinite Reynolds number. Flow separation can be viewed as present in the ideal flow limit; i t is simply embedded in the infinitesimally thin body-surface vortex sheets into which the entire viscous field collapses as vorticity convection overwhelms vorticity diffusion at the infinite-Reynolds-number limit.


2014 ◽  
Vol 574 ◽  
pp. 485-488
Author(s):  
Jun Wang ◽  
Guang Sheng Du ◽  
Yong Hui Liu

In order to get the situation of transitional flow in tube, we tested the fluid field by PIV experiment and acquired the velocity distribution of the flow field at different Reynolds number (Re=2400 and Re=3000). At the same time the structure and characteristics of the flow field were obtained. The experimental result shows that the change of axial velocity in boundary layer is not obvious at low Reynolds number, the fluctuation of axial velocity appears and normal speed changes a little in mainstream area. With the increase of Reynolds number the axial velocity both in boundary layer and mainstream area change obviously, pulsation of the normal speed increases, the state of fluid flow gradually evolves from laminar to transitional flow.


2014 ◽  
Vol 748 ◽  
pp. 848-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod K. Subbareddy ◽  
Matthew D. Bartkowicz ◽  
Graham V. Candler

AbstractWe study the transition of a Mach 6 laminar boundary layer due to an isolated cylindrical roughness element using large-scale direct numerical simulations (DNS). Three flow conditions, corresponding to experiments conducted at the Purdue Mach 6 quiet wind tunnel are simulated. Solutions are obtained using a high-order, low-dissipation scheme for the convection terms in the Navier–Stokes equations. The lowest Reynolds number ($Re$) case is steady, whereas the two higher $Re$ cases break down to a quasi-turbulent state. Statistics from the highest $Re$ case show the presence of a wedge of fully developed turbulent flow towards the end of the domain. The simulations do not employ forcing of any kind, apart from the roughness element itself, and the results suggest a self-sustaining mechanism that causes the flow to transition at a sufficiently large Reynolds number. Statistics, including spectra, are compared with available experimental data. Visualizations of the flow explore the dominant and dynamically significant flow structures: the upstream shock system, the horseshoe vortices formed in the upstream separated boundary layer and the shear layer that separates from the top and sides of the cylindrical roughness element. Streamwise and spanwise planes of data were used to perform a dynamic mode decomposition (DMD) (Rowley et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 641, 2009, pp. 115–127; Schmid, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 656, 2010, pp. 5–28).


1973 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. T. Coleman ◽  
C. Osborne ◽  
J. L. Stollery

A hypersonic gun tunnel has been used to measure the heat transfer to a sharpedged flat plate inclined at various incidences to generate local Mach numbers from 3 to 9. The measurements have been compared with a number of theoretical estimates by plotting the Stanton number against the energy-thickness Reynolds number. The prediction giving the most reasonable agreement throughout the above Mach number range is that due to Fernholz (1971).The values of the skin-friction coefficient derived from velocity profiles and Preston tube data are also given.


2006 ◽  
Vol 552 (-1) ◽  
pp. 353 ◽  
Author(s):  
WENDY C. SANDERS ◽  
ERIC S. WINKEL ◽  
DAVID R. DOWLING ◽  
MARC PERLIN ◽  
STEVEN L. CECCIO

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document