Diagnostic and therapeutic issues of atypical depression in Japan

1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 245-249
Author(s):  
M Asai ◽  
Y Nakane ◽  
S Kanba

SummaryDepressive conditions such as treatment-resistant depression, persistent depression and chronic mild depression have recently been the subject of much interest in Japan. The term “atypical depression” is not in common use, however depressive states falling outside the “typical” categories of the major depressive disorders (MDD) can be discussed in terms of symptomatology, etiology, and response to treatment. The term “neurasthenia” which refers to a hypochondriacal disorder with or without physical illness, as well as to a subtype of neurosis (ICD-9, 300.5), is no longer extensively used. “Dysthymia” is classically employed to signify either a dysphoric state accompanied by mild depression and irritability, as defined by the German school, or a mild depressive personality disorder; it is currently used as an alternative to “neurotic depression” (ICD-9 300.4), or “dysthymic disorder” (DSM III-R). Recurrent brief depression is not yet a prevalent concept in Japan. Despite the observation of depression with hyperphagia and/or hypersomnia, these phenomena have not received a specific designation. Therapeutic approaches to depression include both non-drug modalities (psychotherapy, environmental modification, etc) and the standard drug regimens (antidepressants, anxiolytics, etc); clinical trials are currently underway with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors which we expect to be effective in treatment-resistant depression. Plant-based traditional remedies are still widely employed in Japan, and several of these are described. Finally, we discuss the Morita therapy, a specifically Japanese modality for treatment of mild depression with obsessive-compulsive symptoms based upon the Zen philosophy. This approach involves an initial period of absolute bed-rest, followed by gradual resumption of work and social activities with support and counseling.

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1323-1339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael W Taylor ◽  
Lindsey Marwood ◽  
Ben Greer ◽  
Rebecca Strawbridge ◽  
Anthony J Cleare

Background: Treatment-resistant depression is an important contributor to the global burden of depression. Antidepressant augmentation is a recommended treatment strategy for treatment-resistant patients, but outcomes remain poor. Identifying factors that are predictive of response to augmentation treatments may improve outcomes. Aims: This review aimed to synthesise the existing literature examining predictors of response to augmentation treatments in patients who had insufficiently responded to initial treatment. Methods: A systematic search was conducted identifying 2241 unique manuscripts. 24 examining predictors of outcome to pharmacological or psychological augmentation treatment were included in this review. Results: Atypical antipsychotics were the most frequently assessed treatment class (nine studies), closely followed by mood stabilisers (eight studies). Only one eligible psychological augmentation study was identified. Early response to treatment (week 2) was the best-supported predictor of subsequent treatment outcome, reported by six studies. Many predictor variables were only assessed by one report and others such as pre-treatment severity yielded contradictory results, both within and across treatment classes. Conclusions: This review highlights the importance of early response as a predictor of pharmacological augmentation outcome, with implications for both the monitoring and treatment of resistant unipolar patients. Further replication is needed across specific interventions to fully assess the generalisability of this finding. However, the clear lack of consistent evidence for other predictive factors both within and across treatments, and the scarce examination of psychological augmentation, demonstrates the need for much more research of a high quality if response prediction is to improve outcomes for patients with treatment-resistant depression.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1155-1162
Author(s):  
Lorena Catarina Del Sant ◽  
Luciana Maria Sarin ◽  
Eduardo Jorge Muniz Magalhães ◽  
Ana Cecília Lucchese ◽  
Marco Aurélio Tuena ◽  
...  

Introduction and objectives: The impact of multiple subcutaneous (s.c.) esketamine injections on the blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) of patients with unipolar and bipolar treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the cardiovascular safety of multiple s.c. doses of esketamine in patients with TRD. Methods: Seventy TRD patients received 394 weekly s.c. esketamine injections in conjunction with oral antidepressant therapy for up to six weeks. Weekly esketamine doses were 0.5, 0.75 or 1.0 mg/kg according to each patient’s response to treatment. Participants were monitored before each treatment and every 15 minutes thereafter for 120 minutes. We assessed systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR measurements for the entire treatment course. Results: BP increased after the first s.c. esketamine injection, reaching maximum mean SBP/DBP levels of 4.87/5.54 mmHg within 30–45 minutes. At the end of monitoring, 120 minutes post dose, vital signs returned to pretreatment levels. We did not detect significant differences in BP between doses of 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mg/kg esketamine. Mean HR did not differ significantly between doses or before and after s.c. esketamine injection. Conclusions: The BP changes observed with repeated s.c. esketamine injections were mild and well tolerated for doses up to 1 mg/kg. The s.c. route is a simple and safe method of esketamine administration, even for patients with clinical comorbidities, including obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. However, 14/70 patients experienced treatment-emergent transient hypertension (SBP >180 mmHg and/or a DBP >110 mmHg). Therefore, we strongly recommend monitoring BP for 90 minutes after esketamine dosing. Since s.c. esketamine is cheap, requires less frequent dosing (once a week), and is a simpler procedure compared to intravenous infusions, it might have an impact on public health.


2005 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 357-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Cassano ◽  
Lorenzo Lattanzi ◽  
Maurizio Fava ◽  
Serena Navari ◽  
Giulia Battistini ◽  
...  

Objective: The study aimed to assess the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive ropinirole in outpatients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Method: The study sample consisted of patients with a major depressive episode (diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria) and TRD. Ropinirole 0.25 to 1.5 mg daily was added to tricyclic antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. We conducted assessments at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. We defined response as a 50% or greater reduction of the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score plus a score of 1 (“very much improved”) or 2 (“much improved”) on the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale at endpoint. Tolerability was monitored with the Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. Results: Seven patients had major depressive disorder, and 3 had bipolar II disorder. The mean maximum dose of ropinirole was 1.33 mg daily. Mean (SD) scores on the MADRS decreased from 29.6 (7.6) at baseline to 16.9 (12.1) at endpoint ( P < 0.02). At endpoint, 4 of 10 (40%) patients were responders. Two patients discontinued ropinirole because of dizziness. Conclusions: These pilot data suggest that, in selected cases of TRD, ropinirole augmentation of antidepressants is effective and relatively well tolerated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document