Ethical Dilemmas in Long-Term Care (Facilitator's Edition), by Janine M. Idziak. Dubuque, Iowa: Simon & Kolz Publishing, 2000. 261 pp. $182.50.

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-471
Author(s):  
Bryan Hilliard

Only within the past decade or so have medical ethicists, healthcare policy analysts, and politicians devoted significant time and energy to the myriad issues and problems facing the elderly. Careful consideration has revealed multiple concerns over the treatment of the elderly by families, healthcare providers, government agencies, and facility administrators and staff. One particularly troublesome area of concern involves nursing home placement and care. Dramatic stories sometimes rise to the level of national attention and scrutiny. We hear and read accounts of elder abuse by nursing home staff, indifference by nursing home administrators, disagreements over whether to initiate or withdraw a particular life-sustaining treatment, pain management protocols, physician-assisted suicide, and the issuing and honoring of DNR orders. But then these stories, as well as the ethical and policy debates they engender, are soon forgotten by the general public. Stories often not heard at all involve the everyday, mundane problems and dilemmas faced by nursing home residents. These problems include roommate selection, waiting lists, privacy surrounding grooming and sexual relations, scheduling of meals and sleeping, confidentiality of medical conditions, freedom to walk around the facility or take trips outside the facility, and use of mechanical and chemical restraints. In one sense, these issues are more problematic and more intractable than those represented in dramatic but fleeting news accounts. What is gradually becoming obvious to many is that the problems faced by the elderly in long-term care—whether these problems are remarkable or mundane, rare or frequent—deserve sustained, careful attention.

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas G. Castle

Long-term care institutions have emerged as dominant sites of death for the elderly. However, studies of this trend have primarily examined nursing homes. The purpose of this research is to determine demographic, functional, disease, and facility predictors and/or correlates of death for the elderly residing in board and care facilities. Twelve factors are found to be significant: proportion of residents older than sixty-five years of age, proportion of residents who are chair- or bed-fast, proportion of residents with HIV, bed size, ownership, chain membership, affiliation with a nursing home, number of health services provided other than by the facility, the number of social services provided other than by the facility, the number of social services provided by the facility, and visits by Ombudsmen. These are discussed and comparisons with similar studies in nursing homes are made.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Soldevila ◽  
Núria Prat ◽  
Miquel À. Mas ◽  
Mireia Massot ◽  
Ramon Miralles ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Covid-19 pandemic has particularly affected older people living in Long-term Care settings. Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort of Long-term care nursing home residents between March first and June thirty, 2020, who were ≥ 65 years old and on whom at last one PCR test was performed. Socio-demographic, comorbidities, and clinical data were recorded. Facility size and community incidence of SARS-CoV-2 were also considered.Results: A total of 8021 participants were included from 168 facilities. Mean age was 86.4 years (SD = 7.4). Women represented 74.1%. SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 27.7% of participants, and the overall case fatality rate was 11.3% (24.9% among those with a positive PCR test). Epidemiological factors related to risk of infection were larger facility size (pooled aOR 1.73; P < .001), higher community incidence (pooled aOR 1.67, P = .04), leading to a higher risk than the clinical factor of low level of functional dependence (aOR 1.22, P = 0.03). Epidemiological risk factors associated with mortality were male gender (aOR 1.75; P < .001), age (pooled aOR 1.16; P < .001), and higher community incidence (pooled aOR 1.19, P = < .001). There was evidence of clustering for facility and health area when considering the risk of infection and mortality (P < .001). Conclusions: Our results suggest a complex interplay between structural and individual factors regarding Covid-19 infection and its impact on mortality in nursing-home residents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward H Wagner

Residents in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities comprise a large percentage of the deaths from Covid 19. Is this inevitable or are there problems with NHs and their care that increase the susceptibility of their residents. The first U.S. cluster of cases involved the residents, staff, and visitors of a Seattle-area nursing home. Study of this cluster suggested that infected staff members were transmitting the disease to residents. The quality of nursing home care has long been a concern and attributed to chronic underfunding and resulting understaffing. Most NH care is delivered by minimally trained nursing assistants whose low pay and limited benefits compel them to work in multiple long-term care settings, increasing their risk of infection, and work while ill. More comparative studies of highly infected long-term care facilities with those organizations that were able to better protect their residents are urgently needed. Early evidence suggests that understaffing of registered nurses may increase the risk of larger outbreaks.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S709-S709
Author(s):  
Hemalkumar B Mehta ◽  
Yong-Fang Kuo ◽  
Jordan Westra ◽  
Mukaila Raji ◽  
James S Goodwin

Abstract We examined opioid use in long-term care nursing home residents with dementia. This retrospective cohort study used Minimum Data Set linked Medicare data, 2011-2016, and included long-term care episodes for residents 65+ years who survived 100+ days each year (592,211 episodes for 256,207 residents). Cognitive status at first annual assessment was classified as none/mild, moderate and severe impairment. Overall opioid use, prolonged opioid use (prescription supply 90+ days) and long-acting opioid use were identified from Medicare part D. Descriptive statistics were used to describe opioid use by cognitive impairment. Cochrane Armitage trends test was used to determine trends in opioid use. 114,622 (19%) patients had severe and 129,257 (22%) had moderate dementia. Overall opioid (none/mild=15.4%, moderate=13.9%, severe=9%), prolonged opioid (none/mild=5.2%, moderate=4.5%, severe=3.2%) and long-acting opioid use (none/mild=1.1%, moderate=0.9%, severe=0.3% ) were lower in patients with advanced dementia. Opioid use was significantly higher in females and Whites and varied by states. Substantial increase was found in overall opioid and prolonged opioid use from 2011 to 2016, with greater increase in none/mild and moderate dementia patients. For example, prolonged opioid use increased by 69% in none/mild and 71% in moderate dementia patients compared to 52% in severe dementia patients (p&lt;0.0001). Long-acting opioid use decreased, with a greater decline in none/mild (69%) and moderate (71%) dementia patients compared to severe dementia patients (58%) (p&lt;0.0001). Contrary to decreasing opioid use in community setting, overall and prolonged opioid use increased in nursing home residents. Future studies should identify the reasons behind increased use.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. P1571-P1571
Author(s):  
Hemalkumar B. Mehta ◽  
Yong-Fang Kuo ◽  
Jordan Westra ◽  
James S. Goodwin ◽  
Mukaila Raji

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-426
Author(s):  
Akito Tsugawa ◽  
Soichiro Shimizu ◽  
Daisuke Hirose ◽  
Tomohiko Sato ◽  
Hirokuni Hatanaka ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document