Attitudes of Long-Term Care Social Workers Toward Physician-Assisted-Suicide

2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 175-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Erlbaum-Zur
2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-471
Author(s):  
Bryan Hilliard

Only within the past decade or so have medical ethicists, healthcare policy analysts, and politicians devoted significant time and energy to the myriad issues and problems facing the elderly. Careful consideration has revealed multiple concerns over the treatment of the elderly by families, healthcare providers, government agencies, and facility administrators and staff. One particularly troublesome area of concern involves nursing home placement and care. Dramatic stories sometimes rise to the level of national attention and scrutiny. We hear and read accounts of elder abuse by nursing home staff, indifference by nursing home administrators, disagreements over whether to initiate or withdraw a particular life-sustaining treatment, pain management protocols, physician-assisted suicide, and the issuing and honoring of DNR orders. But then these stories, as well as the ethical and policy debates they engender, are soon forgotten by the general public. Stories often not heard at all involve the everyday, mundane problems and dilemmas faced by nursing home residents. These problems include roommate selection, waiting lists, privacy surrounding grooming and sexual relations, scheduling of meals and sleeping, confidentiality of medical conditions, freedom to walk around the facility or take trips outside the facility, and use of mechanical and chemical restraints. In one sense, these issues are more problematic and more intractable than those represented in dramatic but fleeting news accounts. What is gradually becoming obvious to many is that the problems faced by the elderly in long-term care—whether these problems are remarkable or mundane, rare or frequent—deserve sustained, careful attention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-167
Author(s):  
Kelvin Choi ◽  
Esther T Maas ◽  
Mieke Koehoorn ◽  
Christopher B McLeod

ObjectivesThis study examined time to return-to-work (RTW) among direct healthcare and social workers with violence-related incidents compared with these workers with non-violence-related incidents in British Columbia, Canada.MethodsAccepted workers’ compensation lost-time claims were extracted between 2010 and 2014. Workers with violence-related incidents and with non-violence-related incidents were matched using coarsened exact matching (n=5762). The outcome was days until RTW within 1 year after the first day of time loss, estimated with Cox regression using piecewise models, stratified by injury type, occupation, care setting and shift type.ResultsWorkers with violence-related incidents, compared with workers with non-violence-related incidents, were more likely to RTW within 30 days postinjury, less likely within 61–180 days, and were no different after 181 days. Workers with psychological injuries resulting from a violence-related incident had a lower likelihood to RTW during the year postinjury (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.86). Workers with violence-related incidents in counselling and social work occupations were less likely to RTW within 90 days postinjury (HR 31–60 days: 0.67, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.95 and HR 61–90 days: 0.46, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.69). Workers with violence-related incidents in long-term care and residential social services were less likely to RTW within 91–180 days postinjury.ConclusionsWorkers with psychological injuries, and those in counselling and social work occupations and in long-term care and residential social services, took longer to RTW following a violence-related incident than workers with non-violence-related incidents. Future research should focus on identifying risk factors to reduce the burden of violence and facilitate RTW.


2006 ◽  
Vol 3 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 147-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Lubetkin ◽  
Rachel A. Annunziato ◽  
Deirdre Downes ◽  
Orah R. Burak

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Tregeagle ◽  
Rosemary Hamill

This article presents the findings of a study of unplanned and planned placement changes in foster care programs designed for restoration or time-limited assessment for long-term care. In this study, the causes of placement changes in the program are analysed to assess whether stability could be improved. The study was undertaken by examining computer records of placement changes over a 6-year period, in five Temporary Family Care (TFC) programs. Once these changes were identified, social workers were asked to describe the circumstances of the placement change for each named child. These were then categorised into two groups: unplanned and planned placement changes. Unplanned changes are those that were not anticipated at initial entry to care, nor during scheduled case reviews. The frequency of unplanned changes was 2% of all placements; within this group of unplanned changes no child had more than two unplanned moves and only 0.6% of children had two unplanned changes. Planned placement changes were those changes considered as part of routine case decision-making according to the requirements of the ‘Looking After Children’ (LAC) system. These changes occurred in 4.5% of all planned placements. Some children experienced both planned and unplanned changes. The changes were then categorised according to the reasons for change. Some placement changes appeared unavoidable. This finding leads to questions about whether instability can ever be entirely eliminated. The TFC programs appear to have a lower rate of breakdown than that reported in the literature; however, variations in study design make comparisons difficult.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph L. Durand

This study examines the impact of surveillant care managerialism upon the practice of three social workers employed within the community support sector in Ontario health care. It applies the “Foucauldian Toolkit” of Jason L. Powell to examine the nature of the discourse shaping their practice and how they are both complicit and resistant to these discourses. It introduces recognition theory as counter discourse and argues that through the unique knowledge gained through relationships of respectful recognition that social workers act justly. Moreover it is argued that the relationships between social workers and their clients is the source of our unique knowledges as practitioners. Finally, this study examines the implications of social workers integrating a Foucauldian understanding of the reflexive relationship of power/knowledge and how through intersubjective relationships, we practice, create identities and serve the needs of justice even in a system and profession which does not acknowledge it as a requirement.


2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna B. Davisson ◽  
Pearl M. Mosher-Ashley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document