Breast intraoperative radiotherapy: a review of available modalities, dedicated machines and treatment procedure

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Reza Baghani ◽  
Hajar Moradmand ◽  
Seyed Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Treatment Procedure ◽  
Dose Uniformity ◽  
Dedicated Machines ◽  
Treatment Procedures ◽  
Electron Radiotherapy

AbstractBackgroundBreast intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a partial irradiation technique that delivers a single fraction of radiation dose to the tumour bed during surgery. The use of this technique is increasing (especially in the Middle East), and therefore, it is essential to have a comprehensive approach to this treatment modality. The aim of this study is to conduct a literature review on available IORT modalities during breast irradiation as well as dedicated IORT machines and associated treatment procedures. The main IORT trials and corresponding clinical outcomes are also studied.Materials and MethodsA computerised search was performed through MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, ISI web of knowledge and reference list of related articles.ResultsIORT is now feasible through using two main modalities, including low-kilovolt IORT and intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT). The dedicated machines employed and treatment procedure for mentioned modalities are quite different. The outcomes of implemented clinical trials showed that IORT is not inferior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in specifically selected and well-informed patients and can be considered as an alternative to EBRT.ConclusionAlthough the clinical outcomes of introduced IORT methods are comparable, but based on the review results, it could be said that IOERT is the most effective technical method, in view of the treatment time and dose uniformity concepts. The popularity of IORT is mainly due to the distinguished obtained results during breast cancer treatment. Despite the presence of some technical challenges, it is expected that the IORT technique will become more widespread in the immediate future.

Implementation and experiences of an intraoperative radiotherapy service

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 203-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Armoogum ◽  
C. Ackland ◽  
J. Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Oncology Nurse ◽  
Spherical Volume ◽  
Medical Physicists ◽  
The Mean

Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using a miniature X-ray source has the potential to impart the same clinical benefit as external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), in a single fraction. The patient benefits are significant, since IORT could replace several weeks of fractionated EBRT. We present our initial experiences of IORT using the Zeiss Intrabeam™ system for treating early stage breast cancer and intracranial malignancies. Implementing this treatment modality requires a multidisciplinary approach drawing on the expertise of surgeons, oncologists, medical physicists, anaesthesiologists, nursing staff and pathologists. Team coherence is facilitated by a nurse co-ordinator. We have treated 66 patients in 24 months. For breast tumours, the mean treatment time was 28.54 min and the applicator sizes ranged from 3.0 to 5.0cm (mode = 4.5cm). A dose of 5Gy is prescribed to spherical volume of 1cm from the applicator surface. For brain tumours, the mean treatment time was 19.70 min and the applicator sizes ranged from 1.5 to 3.5cm (mode = 2.5cm). Mean dose was 11.1Gy prescribed to a spherical volume of 0.5cm from the applicator surface.A multidisciplinary team is essential for the successful implementation of IORT. This paper describes how, through reliance on an oncology nurse specialist to co-ordinate the programme, we have successfully set-up an IORT service.

scholarly journals Intraoperative radiotherapy with low energy x-rays after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases – Augsburg University Medical Center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Henning Kahl ◽  
Nikolaos Balagiannis ◽  
Michael Höck ◽  
Sabine Schill ◽  
Zoha Roushan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Resection Cavity ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy

Abstract Purpose External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the predominant method for localized brain radiotherapy (LBRT) after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50kV x-rays is an alternative way to irradiate the resection cavity focally after BM surgery with the option to shorten the overall treatment time and limit normal tissue irradiation.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent neurosurgical resection of BM and 50kV x-ray IORT between 2013 and 2020 at Augsburg University Medical Center.Results We identified 40 patients with 44 resected BM treated with 50kV x-ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 2.8 cm (range 1.5–5.9 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including 3-monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14.4 months, with a median MRI FU for patients alive of 12.2 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 26.4 months (estimated 1-year OS 61.6%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 88.6% (estimated 1-year LC 84.3%). Distant brain control (DC) was 47.5% (estimated 1-year DC 33.5%). Only 25% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radionecrosis rate was 2.5%.Conclusion IORT with 50kV x-rays is a safe and appealing way to apply LBRT after neurosurgical resection of BM with low toxicity and excellent LC. Close MRI FU is paramount to detect distant brain failure (DBF) early.

scholarly journals Intraoperative radiotherapy with low-energy x-rays after neurosurgical resection of brain metastases—an Augsburg University Medical Center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Henning Kahl ◽  
Nikolaos Balagiannis ◽  
Michael Höck ◽  
Sabine Schill ◽  
Zoha Roushan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Resection Cavity ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy

Abstract Purpose External-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is the predominant method for localized brain radiotherapy (LBRT) after resection of brain metastases (BM). Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with 50-kV x‑rays is an alternative way to focally irradiate the resection cavity after BM surgery, with the option of shortening the overall treatment time and limiting normal tissue irradiation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of all patients who underwent neurosurgical resection of BM and 50-kV x‑ray IORT between 2013 and 2020 at Augsburg University Medical Center. Results We identified 40 patients with 44 resected BM treated with 50-kV x‑ray IORT. Median diameter of the resected metastases was 2.8 cm (range 1.5–5.9 cm). Median applied dose was 20 Gy. All patients received standardized follow-up (FU) including 3‑monthly MRI of the brain. Mean FU was 14.4 months, with a median MRI FU for alive patients of 12.2 months. Median overall survival (OS) of all treated patients was 26.4 months (estimated 1‑year OS 61.6%). The observed local control (LC) rate of the resection cavity was 88.6% (estimated 1‑year LC 84.3%). Distant brain control (DC) was 47.5% (estimated 1‑year DC 33.5%). Only 25% of all patients needed WBI in the further course of disease. The observed radionecrosis rate was 2.5%. Conclusion IORT with 50-kV x‑rays is a safe and appealing way to apply LBRT after neurosurgical resection of BM, with low toxicity and excellent LC. Close MRI FU is paramount to detect distant brain failure (DBF) early.

scholarly journals Radiotherapy with Intensity-Modulated (IMRT) Techniques in the Treatment of Anal Carcinoma (RAINSTORM): A Multicenter Study on Behalf of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1902
Author(s):  
Luciana Caravatta ◽  
Giovanna Mantello ◽  
Francesca Valvo ◽  
Pierfrancesco Franco ◽  
Lucrezia Gasparini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Anal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Anal Carcinoma ◽  
Nodal Involvement ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Grade 3

A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the pattern of care and clinical outcomes of anal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques. In a cohort of 987 patients, the clinical complete response (CR) rate (beyond 6 months) was 90.6%. The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 85.8% (95% CI: 84.4–87.2), and the 3-year colostomy-free survival (CFS) rate was 77.9% (95% CI: 76.1–79.8). Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 80.2% and 88.1% (95% CI: 78.8–89.4) (95% CI: 78.5–81.9), respectively. Histological grade 3 and nodal involvement were associated with lower CR (p = 0.030 and p = 0.004, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between advanced stage and nodal involvement, and LC, CFS, PFS, OS and event-free survival (EFS). Overall treatment time (OTT) ≥45 days showed a trend for a lower PFS (p = 0.050) and was significantly associated with lower EFS (p = 0.030) and histological grade 3 with a lower LC (p = 0.025). No statistically significant association was found between total dose, dose/fraction and/or boost modality and clinical outcomes. This analysis reports excellent clinical results and a mild toxicity profile, confirming IMRT techniques as standard of care for the curative treatment of anal cancer patients. Lymph node involvement and histological grade have been confirmed as the most important negative prognostic factors.

scholarly journals Boost IORT in Breast Cancer: Body of Evidence

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Sedlmayer ◽  
Roland Reitsamer ◽  
Christoph Fussl ◽  
Ingrid Ziegler ◽  
Franz Zehentmayr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Dose Delivery ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Accurate Dose ◽  
Electron Boost

The term IORT (intraoperative radiotherapy) is currently used for various techniques that show decisive differences in dose delivery. The largest evidence for boost IORT preceding whole breast irradiation (WBI) originates from intraoperative electron treatments with single doses around 10 Gy, providing outstandingly low local recurrence rates in any risk constellation also at long term analyses. Compared to other boost methods, an intraoperative treatment has evident advantages as follows.Precision.Direct visualisation of the tumour bed during surgery guarantees an accurate dose delivery. This fact has additionally gained importance in times of primary reconstruction techniques after lumpectomy to optimise cosmetic outcome. IORT is performed before breast tissue is mobilised for plastic purposes.Cosmesis.As a consequence of direct tissue exposure without distension by hematoma/seroma, IORT allows for small treatment volumes and complete skin sparing, both having a positive effect on late tissue tolerance and, hence, cosmetic appearance.Patient Comfort.Boost IORT marginally prolongs the surgical procedure, while significantly shortening postoperative radiotherapy. Its combination with a 3-week hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy to the whole breast (WBI) is presently tested in the HIOB trial (hypofractionated WBI preceded by IORT electron boost), a prospective multicenter trial of the International Society of Intraoperative Radiotherapy (ISIORT).

scholarly journals Effect of intraoperative radiotherapy on wound healing in breast cancer patient post breast conserving surgery, KSUMC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Case series and review of literature.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (06) ◽  
pp. 4505-4510
Author(s):  
Dr. Maha Alamodi Alghamdi ◽  
Abdulaziz Saleh Altwjri ◽  
Abdullah Alsuhaibani ◽  
Abdulaziz Alsaif
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Hormone Receptor Status ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
External Beam ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Receptor Status

Intraoperative radiotherapy during breast-conserving surgery is being studied as an alternative to 6 weeks of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for low-risk women; it can be delivered using electrons (intraoperative electron radiotherapy, IOERT) or 50-kV X-rays. Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) may pose a risk for wound complications.  Between March 2018 and June 2018, 5 breast cancer patients, all eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS), were treated at the King Saud Medical city with IORT using the IOERT. Complete data sets for age, stage (T, N, and M), and histology and hormone receptor status were available in 5 cases. Parameters to identify eligible patients are as follows: ESTRO: >50 years, invasive ductal carcinoma/other favourable histology (IDC), T1-2 (≤3 cm), N0, any hormone receptor status, M0; ASTRO: ≥60 years, IDC, T1, N0, positive estrogen hormone receptor status, M0; TARGIT E “elderly”, risk adapted radiotherapy with IORT followed by external beam radiotherapy in case of risk factors in final histopathology. Consecutive patients operated on with the same surgical technique and given IORT were included. Wound complications were evaluated.

Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 996-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ella Sanders ◽  
Troy Scroggins ◽  
Federico L. Ampil ◽  
Benjamin D. Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation ◽  
Intracavitary Brachytherapy ◽  
Partial Breast Irradiation ◽  
Breast Irradiation

Whole-breast irradiation, as part of breast-conservation therapy (BCT), has well-established results, good cosmesis, and low toxicity. Results from the BCT trials suggest that the risk for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence resides within close proximity to the original tumor site. This leads investigators to consider the role of an accelerated and more tumor bed–focused course of radiotherapy. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) involves treating a limited volume of breast tissue, with dose of irradiation per fraction increased and the treatment time course decreased. Four currently available methods of APBI are interstitial brachytherapy, intracavitary brachytherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiotherapy. Patient selection is critical. This review article presents some preliminary clinical observations and limitations that suggest a potential role for APBI as a more user-friendly mode for delivering radiotherapy after lumpectomy for early breast cancer.

scholarly journals Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: The Lasting Effects of a Fleeting Treatment

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriet B. Eldredge-Hindy ◽  
Anne L. Rosenberg ◽  
Nicole L. Simone
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Intraoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Partial Breast Irradiation ◽  
Breast Irradiation ◽  
Breast Radiotherapy

In well-selected patients who choose to pursue breast conservation therapy (BCT) for early-stage breast cancer, partial breast irradiation (PBI) delivered externally or intraoperatively, may be a viable alternative to conventional whole breast irradiation. Two large, contemporary randomized trials have demonstrated breast intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) to be noninferior to whole breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) when assessing for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in select patients. Additionally, IORT and other PBI techniques are likely to be more widely adopted in the future because they improve patient convenience by offering an accelerated course of treatment. Coupled with these novel techniques for breast radiotherapy (RT) are distinct toxicity profiles and unique cosmetic alterations that differ from conventional breast EBRT and have the potential to impact disease surveillance and patient satisfaction. This paper will review the level-one evidence for treatment efficacy as well as important secondary endpoints like RT toxicity, breast cosmesis, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and surveillance mammography following BCT with IORT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document