scholarly journals Probing Bow Shocks Around Exoplanets During Transits

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (S282) ◽  
pp. 117-118
Author(s):  
A. A. Vidotto ◽  
M. Jardine ◽  
C. Helling

AbstractHere, we summarise the conditions that might lead to the formation of a bow shock surrounding a planet's magnetosphere. Such shocks are formed as a result of the interaction of a planet with its host star wind. In the case of close-in planets, the shock develops ahead of the planetary orbit. If this shocked material is able to absorb stellar radiation, the shock signature can be revealed in (asymmetric) transit light curves. We propose that this is the case of the gas giant planet WASP-12b, whose near-UV transit observations have detected the presence of an extended material ahead of the planetary orbit. We show that shock detection through transit observations can be a useful tool to constrain planetary magnetic fields.

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Cuartas-Restrepo

Abstract This work seeks to summarize some special aspects of a type of exoplanets known as super-Earths (SE), and the direct influence of these aspects in their habitability. Physical processes like the internal thermal evolution and the generation of a protective Planetary Magnetic Field (PMF) are directly related with habitability. Other aspects such as rotation and the formation of a solid core are fundamental when analyzing the possibilities that a SE would have to be habitable. This work analyzes the fundamental theoretical aspects on which the models of thermal evolution and the scaling laws of the planetary dynamos are based. These theoretical aspects allow to develop models of the magnetic evolution of the planets and the role played by the PMF in the protection of the atmosphere and the habitability of the planet.


2007 ◽  
Vol 129 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 245-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rickard Lundin ◽  
Helmut Lammer ◽  
Ignasi Ribas

Science ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 158 (3801) ◽  
pp. 674-674
Author(s):  
J. A. Van Allen

Science ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 158 (3801) ◽  
pp. 674-674
Author(s):  
Robert T. Brown

Science ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 158 (3801) ◽  
pp. 674-674
Author(s):  
Robert T. Brown

2018 ◽  
Vol 617 ◽  
pp. A68 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Hueso ◽  
M. Delcroix ◽  
A. Sánchez-Lavega ◽  
S. Pedranghelu ◽  
G. Kernbauer ◽  
...  

Context. Video observations of Jupiter obtained by amateur astronomers over the past 8 years have shown five flashes of light with durations of 1–2 s, each observed by at least two observers that were geographically separated. The first three of these events occurred on 3 June 2010, 20 August 2010, and 10 September 2012. Previous analyses of their light curves showed that they were caused by the impact of objects of 5–20 m in diameter, depending on their density, with a released energy comparable to superbolides on Earth of the class of the Chelyabinsk airburst. The most recent two flashes on Jupiter were detected on 17 March 2016 and 26 May 2017 and are analyzed here. Aims. We characterize the energy involved together with the masses and sizes of the objects that produced these flashes. The rate of similar impacts on Jupiter provides improved constraints on the total flux of impacts on the planet, which can be compared to the amount of exogenic species detected in the upper atmosphere of Jupiter. Methods. We extracted light curves of the flashes and calculated the masses and sizes of the impacting objects after calibrating each video observation. We also present results from a systematic search of impacts on >72 000 video amateur observations with a customized software that is based on differential photometry of the images. An examination of the number of amateur observations of Jupiter as a function of time over the past years allows us to interpret the statistics of these impact detections. Results. The cumulative flux of small objects (5–20 m or larger) that impact Jupiter is predicted to be low (10–65 impacts per year), and only a fraction of them are potentially observable from Earth (4–25 observable impacts per year in a perfect survey). These numbers imply that many observers are required to efficiently discover Jupiter impacts. Conclusions. We predict that more impacts will be found in the next years, with Jupiter opposition displaced toward summer in the northern hemisphere where most amateur astronomers observe. Objects of this size contribute negligibly to the abundance of exogenous species and dust in the stratosphere of Jupiter when compared with the continuous flux from interplanetary dust particles punctuated by giant impacts. Flashes of a high enough brightness (comparable at their peak to a +3.3 magnitude star) could produce an observable debris field on the planet. We estimate that a continuous search for these impacts might find these events once every 0.4–2.6 yr.


2011 ◽  
Vol 740 (2) ◽  
pp. 76 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ramírez ◽  
J. Meléndez ◽  
D. Cornejo ◽  
I. U. Roederer ◽  
J. R. Fish

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document