scholarly journals The impact of slow economic growth on health sector reform: a cross-national perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 382-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Saltman

AbstractThis paper assesses recent health sector reform strategies across Europe adopted since the onset of the 2008 financial crisis. It begins with a brief overview of the continued economic pressure on public funding for health care services, particularly in tax-funded Northern European health care systems. While economic growth rates across Europe have risen a bit in the last year, they remain below the level necessary to provide the needed expansion of public health sector revenues. This continued public revenue shortage has become the central challenge that policymakers in these health systems confront, and increasingly constrains their potential range of policy options. The paper then examines the types of targeted reforms that various European governments have introduced in response to this increased fiscal stringency. Particularly in tax-funded health systems, these efforts have been focused on two types of changes on the production side of their health systems: consolidating and/or centralizing administrative authority over public hospitals, and revamping secondary and primary health services as well as social services to reduce the volume, cost and less-than-optimal outcomes of existing public elderly care programs. While revamping elderly care services also was pursued in the social health insurance (SHI) system in the Netherlands, both the Dutch and the German health systems also made important changes on the financing side of their health systems. Both types of targeted reforms are illustrated through short country case studies. Each of these country assessments flags up new mechanisms that have been introduced and which potentially could be reshaped and applied in other national health sector contexts. Reflecting the tax-funded structure of the Canadian health system, the preponderance of cases discussed focus on tax-funded countries (Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, England, Ireland), with additional brief assessments of recent changes in the SHI-funded health systems in the Netherlands and Germany. The paper concludes that post-2008 European reforms have helped stretch existing public funds more effectively, but seem unlikely to resolve the core problem of inadequate overall public funding, particularly in tax-based health systems. This observation suggests that ongoing Canadian efforts to consolidate and better integrate its health care providers, while important, may not eliminate long-term health sector-funding dilemmas.

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-271
Author(s):  
Tomonori Hasegawa ◽  
Kunichika Matsumoto ◽  
Ryo Onishi ◽  
Koki Hirata

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the health sector reform toward 2040 of Japan as a super-aged society.Design/methodology/approachThis paper discusses the current healthcare policies adopted in Japan and projects the challenges in future as a super-aged society.FindingsThrough Japanese experiences, it is considered that Community-based Integrated Care System is useful, which takes into account the perspective of health care users. Being a super-aged society, it is essential for Japan to have more consensus by further removing obstacles, and paying attention to the change of paradigm and the purpose of care.Originality/valueBased on the case of Japan, this paper serves as a reference for other East Asian countries, which would sooner or later encounter the similar situation of becoming super-aged societies in the 21st century.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Suleiman ◽  
Sambo Abubakar ◽  
Hamza Shehu Mohammed

This paper studies the policy reforms in the Nigerian health sector and potentiality of the sector towards poverty reduction in the country. The study investigates the contribution of health in the process of poverty reduction by various governments in Nigeria. The study employs secondary source as a methods of data collection. The study reveals that health sector reform involves more than just improvement in health or health care. It is a process motivated by the need to address fundamental deficiencies in health care systems that affect all health care services. Health sector reform in Nigeria is based on the poor health status of the population and the poor rating of the health system itself. The study reveals that Nigerian health status was ranked 187 out of 191 countries by WHO in 2000. The infant mortality rate, the under-five mortality rate and the maternal mortality ratio are some of the indicators that are often used to compare health status of populations. Nigeria’s figures on each of the three indicators are some of the worst in the world, even by the standard of developing countries. The health sector reform was one of the social sector reforms undertaken by the Obasanjo administration, with the National Economic Empowerment Development Strategy (NEEDS) providing the overall national development framework. The NEEDS, itself, has four major goals: wealth creation, poverty reduction, employment generation and value re-orientation. Consequently, the study look at the contribution of the health sector reform towards reduction of poverty in Nigeria.


2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Judith Dwyer ◽  
Sandra G Leggat

THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION (Productivity Commission 2004) has nominated nationally coordinated health sector reform as one of two top priorities (along with natural resource management) for extending the industry reform agenda under the aegis of National Competition Policy. This is in recognition of the importance of these areas for the wellbeing of Australians, and the level of resources they will require in future years. The Commission states that ?an independent review of Australia?s health system as a whole is a critical first step in achieving cooperative solutions to deep-seated structural problems? (p. XI). The fragmentation in health system governance that results from the national? state split is mirrored in the lack of coordinated care at many levels throughout the system. The Commission?s proposal has been welcomed by many in the health industry, no doubt with some nervousness, because of the broad and deep conviction that something has to change in the apparently intractable problem of split funding responsibilities. ?Today?s health-care delivery systems are not organized in ways that promote best quality. Service delivery is largely uncoordinated, requiring steps and patient ?hand-offs? that slow down care and decrease rather than improve patient safety? (OECD 2004). Improving care coordination is high on the list of issues to be addressed in any reform of the health sector. This issue of the journal features a collection of papers which address the sometimes jagged ?seams? in the current system. They offer insights into some of the consequences of the structural problems the Productivity Commission would like to see addressed, and document an energetic search for methods of enhancing the effectiveness of health care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document