scholarly journals Family networks and healthy behaviour: evidence from Nepal

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolene Skordis ◽  
Noemi Pace ◽  
Marcos Vera-Hernandez ◽  
Imran Rasul ◽  
Emla Fitzsimons ◽  
...  

AbstractModels of household decision-making commonly focus on nuclear family members as primary decision-makers. If extended families shape the objectives and constraints of households, then neglecting the role of this network may lead to an incomplete understanding of health-seeking behaviour. Understanding the decision-making processes behind care-seeking may improve behaviour change interventions, better intervention targeting and support health-related development goals. This paper uses data from a cluster randomised trial of a participatory learning and action cycle (PLA) through women’s groups, to assess the role of extended family networks as a determinant of gains in health knowledge and health practice. We estimate three models along a continuum of health-seeking behaviour: one that explores access to PLA groups as a conduit of knowledge, another measuring whether women’s health knowledge improves after exposure to the PLA groups and a third exploring the determinants of their ability to act on knowledge gained. We find that, in this context, a larger network of family is not associated with women’s likelihood of attending groups or acquiring new knowledge, but a larger network of husband’s family is negatively associated with the ability to act on that knowledge during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e019994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terri Lynn Woodard ◽  
Aubri S Hoffman ◽  
Laura C Crocker ◽  
Deborah A Holman ◽  
Derek B Hoffman ◽  
...  

IntroductionNational guidelines recommend that all reproductive-age women with cancer be informed of their fertility risks and offered referral to fertility specialists to discuss fertility preservation options. However, reports indicate that only 5% of patients have consultations, and rates of long-term infertility-related distress remain high. Previous studies report several barriers to fertility preservation; however, initial success has been reported using provider education, patient decision aids and navigation support. This protocol will test effects of a multicomponent intervention compared with usual care on women’s fertility preservation knowledge and decision-making outcomes.Methods and analysisThis cluster-randomised trial will compare the multicomponent intervention (provider education, patient decision aid and navigation support) with usual care (consultation and referral, if requested). One hundred newly diagnosed English-speaking women of reproductive age who are at risk of cancer-related infertility will be recruited from four regional oncology clinics.ThePathwayspatient decision aid website provides (1) up-to-date evidence and descriptions of fertility preservation and other family-building options, tailored to cancer type; (2) structured guidance to support personalising the information and informed decision-making; and (3) a printable summary to help women prepare for discussions with their oncologist and/or fertility specialist. Four sites will be randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Participants will be recruited after their oncology consultation and asked to complete online questionnaires at baseline, 1 week and 2 months to assess their demographics, fertility preservation knowledge, and decision-making process and quality. The primary outcome (decisional conflict) will be tested using Fisher’s exact test. Secondary outcomes will be assessed using generalised linear mixed models, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted, as appropriate.Ethics and disseminationThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center provided approval and ongoing review of this protocol. Results will be presented at relevant scientific meetings and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT03141437; Pre-results.


2007 ◽  
Vol 43 (17) ◽  
pp. 2506-2514 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.H. Kunkler ◽  
R.J. Prescott ◽  
R.J. Lee ◽  
J.A. Brebner ◽  
J.A. Cairns ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e31
Author(s):  
M.C. Watson ◽  
R. Holland ◽  
J. Ferguson ◽  
T. Porteous ◽  
T. Sach ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document