scholarly journals Strategies to deal with comorbid physical illness in psychosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Docherty ◽  
B. Stubbs ◽  
F. Gaughran
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Physical Illness ◽  
Mental Illnesses ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Future Direction ◽  
Stakeholder Culture

Individuals with serious mental illnesses such as psychosis still experience higher mortality rates than the general population, decades after data have linked the gap to increased rates of physical illness, delayed diagnosis, low treatment rates and worse outcomes from treatment received. The nature of the relationship between psychosis and comorbid physical illness is complex. Multiple strategies directed at different levels of disease process, health care systems and stakeholder culture are likely required to make sustained progress in reducing the mortality gap. Evidence for strategies that effectively reduce the burden of physical co-morbidity and lead to improved health outcomes are still in their infancy but growing at a reassuringly fast rate. This editorial considers the existing evidence base and makes suggestions for the development and future direction of this urgent research agenda and how this knowledge can be implemented in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Impact of weight trajectory after bariatric surgery on co-morbidity evolution and burden

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Davis ◽  
Rhodri Saunders
Keyword(s):  
Bariatric Surgery ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Weight Change ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Morbidity Burden ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Predict Weight Loss

Abstract Background Bariatric surgery, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [RYGB] has been shown to be an effective intervention for weight management in select patients. After surgery, different patients respond differently even to the same surgery and have differing weight-change trajectories . The present analysis explores how improving a patient’s post-surgical weight change could impact co‑morbidity prevalence, treatment and associated costs in the Canadian setting. Methods Published data were used to derive statistical models to predict weight loss and co‑morbidity evolution after RYGB. Burden in the form of patient-years of co-morbidity treatment and associated costs was estimated for a 100-patient cohort on one of 6 weight trajectories, and for real-world simulations of mixed patient cohorts where patients experience multiple weight loss outcomes over a 10-year time horizon after RYGB surgery. Costs (2018 Canadian dollars) were considered from the Canadian public payer perspective for diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Robustness of results was assessed using probabilistic sensitivity analyses using the R language. Results Models fitted to patient data for total weight loss and co-morbidity evolution (resolution and new onset) demonstrated good fitting. Improvement of 100 patients from the worst to the best weight loss trajectory was associated with a 50% reduction in 10-year co-morbidity treatment costs, decreasing to a 27% reduction for an intermediate improvement. Results applied to mixed trajectory cohorts revealed that broad improvements by one trajectory group for all patients were associated with 602, 1,710 and 966 patient-years of treatment of type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia respectively in Ontario, the province of highest RYGB volume, corresponding to a cost difference of $3.9 million. Conclusions Post-surgical weight trajectory, even for patients receiving the same surgery, can have a considerable impact on subsequent co-morbidity burden. Given the potential for alleviated burden associated with improving patient trajectory after RYGB, health care systems may wish to consider investments based on local needs and available resources to ensure that more patients achieve a good long-term weight trajectory.

Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene M. Langevin
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Potential Harm ◽  
Therapeutic Massage ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Alternative Sources

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) refers to a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not considered to be part of conventional or allopathic medicine. Common CAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, meditation, and therapeutic massage) are gradually becoming incorporated into conventional care in response to patients looking to alternative sources for information and advice about health matters and increased understanding of various CAM methods through evidence-based testing. However, although the claims of some methods are supported with academic research, well-founded concerns remain in many popularized CAM practices regarding the lack of evidence and placebo effects. It is thus imperative for physicians to be comfortable in discussing CAM-related topics with patients and be able to appropriately and informatively guide them in a way that harnesses potential benefits and avoids potential harm. In this review, the major CAM therapies in the United States are examined, including the settings in which they are being used, evidence base status, and efficacy of some of the most commonly used modalities.  This review contains 5 figures, 21 tables, and 123 references. Keywords: Alternative medicine, complementary medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, massage therapy, naturopathy

scholarly journals Intra articular hyaluronic acid versus intra articular triamcinolone hexacetonide in primary osteoarthritis of knee: a comparative study

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 2794
Author(s):  
Sabeena Kizhedath ◽  
Gopesh Valoth ◽  
Bindhu Vasudevan
Keyword(s):  
Hyaluronic Acid ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Primary Osteoarthritis ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Efficacy Assessment ◽  
Joint Line Tenderness

Background: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful, chronic disease with widespread burden on patients, communities, social and health care systems. Intraarticular (IA) Hyaluronic acid (HA) and corticosteroids are established treatments for OA knee. However, concerns exist regarding effect, duration, safety, effectiveness across population and heterogeneity. Aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of IA HA with THA in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis knee.Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was done among 30 patients. One group (n=15) received IA THA 20mg/2mL on day 0 and other group (n=15) received IA HA 20mg/2 mL on day 0, 7 and 14 under aseptic precautions. The efficacy assessment using VAS for overall pain, joint line tenderness and 15m walking time in seconds were recorded. Side effects if any were noted.Results: Comparing both treatments IA THA provided superior short-term pain relief. But HA showed sustained benefit up to six months.Conclusions: OA being a chronic disease process, we need a drug which has a long-lasting effect. Additive effect of HA and THA can be considered for better efficacy.

scholarly journals A literature review of interventions to reduce stress in doctors

2019 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-53
Author(s):  
Rachel Locke ◽  
Amanda Lees
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Continuing Professional Development ◽  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Positive Outcome ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Inclusive Approach ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Harmful Effects ◽  
Review Criteria

Aim: Stress is prevalent among doctors, and interventions are offered, often as part of their continuing professional development, to help doctors learn in the workplace about the recognition, prevention and management of the harmful effects of stress. The aim of this review was to examine existing research to ascertain the features of successful educational interventions with practising doctors and any factors that may affect outcomes. Methods: We searched key databases for papers published between 1990 and 2017 on the themes of stress that included an education-based intervention and practising doctors. Using an inclusive approach to the review, a broad evaluation was made of the primary research using both quantitative and/or qualitative evidence where the study reported a positive outcome in terms of stress management. Results: Review criteria were met in 31 studies of 1,356 originally retrieved. Three broad categories of interventions emerged from the coding process: mindfulness-type ( n = 12), coping and solutions focused (CSF) ( n = 12) and reflective groups ( n = 7). There is evidence that these interventions can be successful to help doctors deal with stress. Based on the results from this review, an original guide is advanced to help educators choose an educational intervention. Conclusion: Although evidence for some interventions may be ‘hierarchically stronger’, it is misleading to assume that interventions can be imported as successfully into any context. Factors such as medical specialty and health care systems may affect which intervention can be used. The guide offers an evidence base on which further research can be built.

Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene M. Langevin
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Potential Harm ◽  
Therapeutic Massage ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Alternative Sources

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) refers to a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not considered to be part of conventional or allopathic medicine. Common CAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, meditation, and therapeutic massage) are gradually becoming incorporated into conventional care in response to patients looking to alternative sources for information and advice about health matters and increased understanding of various CAM methods through evidence-based testing. However, although the claims of some methods are supported with academic research, well-founded concerns remain in many popularized CAM practices regarding the lack of evidence and placebo effects. It is thus imperative for physicians to be comfortable in discussing CAM-related topics with patients and be able to appropriately and informatively guide them in a way that harnesses potential benefits and avoids potential harm. In this review, the major CAM therapies in the United States are examined, including the settings in which they are being used, evidence base status, and efficacy of some of the most commonly used modalities.  This review contains 5 figures, 21 tables, and 123 references. Keywords: Alternative medicine, complementary medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, massage therapy, naturopathy

Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene M. Langevin
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Potential Harm ◽  
Therapeutic Massage ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Alternative Sources

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) refers to a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not considered to be part of conventional or allopathic medicine. Common CAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, meditation, and therapeutic massage) are gradually becoming incorporated into conventional care in response to patients looking to alternative sources for information and advice about health matters and increased understanding of various CAM methods through evidence-based testing. However, although the claims of some methods are supported with academic research, well-founded concerns remain in many popularized CAM practices regarding the lack of evidence and placebo effects. It is thus imperative for physicians to be comfortable in discussing CAM-related topics with patients and be able to appropriately and informatively guide them in a way that harnesses potential benefits and avoids potential harm. In this review, the major CAM therapies in the United States are examined, including the settings in which they are being used, evidence base status, and efficacy of some of the most commonly used modalities.  This review contains 5 figures, 21 tables, and 123 references. Keywords: Alternative medicine, complementary medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, massage therapy, naturopathy

Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helene M. Langevin
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
The United States ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Potential Harm ◽  
Therapeutic Massage ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Alternative Sources

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) refers to a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not considered to be part of conventional or allopathic medicine. Common CAM practices (e.g., acupuncture, meditation, and therapeutic massage) are gradually becoming incorporated into conventional care in response to patients looking to alternative sources for information and advice about health matters and increased understanding of various CAM methods through evidence-based testing. However, although the claims of some methods are supported with academic research, well-founded concerns remain in many popularized CAM practices regarding the lack of evidence and placebo effects. It is thus imperative for physicians to be comfortable in discussing CAM-related topics with patients and be able to appropriately and informatively guide them in a way that harnesses potential benefits and avoids potential harm. In this review, the major CAM therapies in the United States are examined, including the settings in which they are being used, evidence base status, and efficacy of some of the most commonly used modalities.  This review contains 5 figures, 21 tables, and 123 references. Keywords: Alternative medicine, complementary medicine, acupuncture, homeopathy, osteopathy, chiropractic, massage therapy, naturopathy

Patient self-testing in chronic disease management

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice J. O’Kane
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Self Testing ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Robust Evidence

AbstractChronic disease poses a major burden to patients and health care systems. This review considers how patient self-testing can contribute to the management of chronic disease. Self-testing can only confer benefit if it occurs in the context of an empowered patient who has the skills and training to translate test results into meaningful actions. The benefits may include improved clinical outcomes, greater patient convenience and improved psychological well-being; separately and together these may contribute to reduced costs of care. As self-testing may be expensive and burdensome to patients, it is important that its use in chronic disease is supported by a robust evidence base confirming its utility and efficacy. The design of studies to assess the impact of self-testing poses challenges for the researcher and the quality of evidence presented is often variable. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide more robust evidence than observational studies; the intervention under study is not just self-testing but includes the educational support to allow patients to use results effectively. This review discusses the evidence base relating to patient self-testing in diabetes, anticoagulant monitoring and in renal transplant patients and in particular highlights the impact of new technology developments such as flash glucose monitoring in diabetes.

Health-care technology assessment: a clinical perspective

2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Chantler
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Public Health Care ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Care Technology ◽  
Provision Of Care

Health technology assessment needs to relate to contemporary questions which concern public health-care systems: how to keep people healthy, how to focus on the needs of those with chronic disabilities and integrate care between the hospital and the community, how to encourage and audit effective teamwork, and how to establish a consensus about what is effective and affordable. Clinicians have an ethical responsibility to practice efficiently and economically, for profligacy in the care of one patient may mean that another is treated inadequately. For similar reasons, clinicians need to play a full role in the management of services. Advice from health technology assessment is vital and needs to be accurate, relevant, timely, clear, and accessible. As well as being concerned about what works, we need also to eliminate from practice what does not. Regular audit and appraisal of practice against the evidence base should be useful in this respect. Alternative approaches to management, such as the provision of care as opposed to aggressive treatments, need to be evaluated, and health technology assessment needs to consider how services are delivered, not just specific treatments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document