The Norwegian Supreme Court and Strasbourg: The Case of Lillo-Stenberg and Sæther v. Norway

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1293-1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnfinn Bårdsen
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Right To Privacy ◽  
Performing Artists ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Do So

This article attempts to give a brief overview as to the interplay between the Norwegian Supreme Court and the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. I will do so partly on a general footing and partly connected to a couple of specific cases. In particular, I will comment on the 16 January 2014 judgment from the Strasbourg Court in the Case of Lillo-Stenberg and Sæther v. Norway. This case involved an alleged violation of the right to privacy according to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), by publishing pictures from the wedding of a well-known couple-both performing artists-in a weekly magazine, without their consent.

3. A legal right

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Wacks
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Human Right ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
Individual Privacy ◽  
European Court ◽  
Us Supreme Court ◽  
The Right

Privacy is acknowledged as an essential human right, recognized by a number of international declarations, among which the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights are the most significant. Interpreting these provisions, the European Court of Human Rights provides important guidance in respect of the attempt to balance privacy against competing rights and interests, and this is briefly discussed. Leading decisions of the courts of various jurisdictions illustrate the problems of definition and the attempt to balance privacy against other competing rights. Cases before the US Supreme Court have generated an enormous, divisive debate concerning, in particular, the subject of abortion, which the Court has conceived to be an element of the right to privacy. A discussion of the celebrated US Supreme Court judgement in Roe v Wade is fundamental to an analysis of the meaning and limits of individual privacy.

scholarly journals Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the right to privacy in the Constitution of Montenegro

2020 ◽  
pp. 101-114
Author(s):  
Ivan Vukčević
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Critical Approach ◽  
Right To Privacy ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
European Court ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Right ◽  
Different Content

The subject of this paper is a comparative analysis of the right to respect for private and family life in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the right to privacy in the Constitution of Montenegro. To this end, the paper presents relevant provisions in these documents along with a critical approach to their (in) compliance, both in the determination of specific rights and in cases of their restriction. The paper seeks to offer an answer to the question on whether this right is adequately implemented in the Constitution of Montenegro, as well as whether its different content, analyzed on the concrete example, requires direct application of international law. The author also seeks to provide information on whether insufficient harmonization of the provisions of international and national law in this area may affect more complete protection of this right. To this end, the paper analyzes one of the cases in which the European Court of Human Rights ruled on the violation of Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in relation to Montenegro. Starting from the presented subject matter, at the end of the paper, appropriate conclusions are drawn about possible directions of improvement of existing solutions and practices in which they are realized. Author primarily used normative and comparative law method together with the case-law analysis.

scholarly journals FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (4/2020) ◽  
pp. 249-265
Author(s):  
Goran Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Private Life ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Right To Privacy ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

The paper analyzes the relationship between freedom of expression and the right to respect for honour and reputation. It was pointed out the importance that is given to freedom of expression nowadays, and it was especially considered the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. On that occasion, the difference that exists between public and private personalities was pointed out, as well as the doubts that may arise from the distinction between factual statements and value judgments. When it comes to the right to privacy, the author referred to the importance of honour and reputation, and on that occasion reminded of the “double” presence of these values. In one case it is Art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and in another the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the meaning of the term of the right to privacy from Art. 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Solutions in domestic law and case law are analyzed, and special attention is paid to one case in which the relationship between freedom of expression and violation of honor and reputation was discussed. The specificity of this situation is reflected, inter alia, in the fact that we are talking about university professors. The author used the normative, comparative and historical method when writing the paper.

scholarly journals Prawo do naturalnego i godnego umierania

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Orzeszyna
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Case Law ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Artificial Nutrition ◽  
Artificial Nutrition And Hydration ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right

<p>The article addresses the issue of the right to natural and dignified dying in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. The right to life enshrined in Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights is currently balanced in judicial practice with the right to privacy. The right to effectively demand inflicting death is usually located in the sphere of autonomous human decisions. However, not only is the construction of such a right contrary to the principle of dignity of every person, but it would erode the guarantees vested in any terminally-ill person. The analysis of Strasbourg’s case-law setting a common standard for the ECHR Member States does not make it possible to assume the existence of the right to death as a subjective right of an individual. In the area of the protection of human life, States are obliged to take positive action. That relatively established case-law was clearly modified in the case <em>Lambert and others v. France</em>, as the Court crossed the red line in favour of passive euthanasia, accepting the vague French procedural rules recognizing artificial nutrition and hydration of the patient as a form of therapy that may be discontinued.</p>

scholarly journals Disposal of the person’s hospitalization in the medical insitution for conducting forensic examinations in the criminal procceedings

2021 ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Dinu Ostavciuc ◽  
◽  
Tudor Osoianu ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Medical Institution ◽  
Individual Freedom ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right ◽  
Judicial Expertise ◽  
Fundamental Values

Individual freedom is one of the fundamental values protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, due to its importance, requiring a rigorous review by the European Court of Human Rights of any measure that could infringe this value. At the same time, this fundamental right is protected by the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova and the Code of Criminal Procedure, due to which individual freedom is inviolable, and its coercion is allowed only in cases and with the procedure strictly regulated by law. The hospitalization of the person in the medical institution is a form of de privation of liberty and, respectively, it is going to take place only on the basis of a court authorization. At the same time, the person’s hospitalization can affect the right to privacy. It is therefore strictly necessary that the whole procedure be followed imperatively and without exception. The disposition of the forced internment of the person in a medical institution for the performance of judicial expertise in the criminal process is within the competence of the investigating judge. Therefore, this article is dedicated to the procedure regarding the hospitalization of the person in the medical institution, on the basis of grounds and reasons on which the hospitalization can take place, the attribution of the criminal investigation body and the prosecutor in cases when there is a need to hospitalize the person.

scholarly journals The Case Fontevecchia and D’amico Against Argentina

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 179-190
Author(s):  
Everson Alexandre de Assumpção
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Vienna Convention ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Right To Privacy ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
International Court ◽  
The Right

This scientific article was based on a case study, judged by the Argentine Supreme Court. In this process, the author filed a civil action in the civil court to compensate the damage against the authors, understanding that the right to privacy, privacy, honor and image rights were violated. The article sought to analyze the collision of principles, rules, rights and jurisprudence that led the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to rule in favor of Jorge Fontevecchia and Heitor D’amico. These were condemned by the Argentine State for understanding that there was a violation of the Right to Privacy. However, the international court decided to revoke the judgment passed and judged by the Supreme Court of the Argentine Nation, understanding that Fontevechia and D’amigo did not violate the Right to Freedom of Expression, making the action illegal and, therefore, forcing the Argentine State to withdraw the action and also to promote the due reparation of the damages caused to the. On February 14, 2017, the Argentine State rejected the decision of the Inter-American Court, transforming this case into one of the most famous “leading cases” of Argentine international public law. Finally, on October 18, 2017, the International Court issued another resolution to render the sentence in the Fontevecchia y D’Amico case ineffective. It was concluded, therefore, that even with the Argentine constitutional reform of 1994 and the granting of a constitutional hierarchy to international human rights standards, it was defined that the rules of international treaties “do not derogate from the provisions of the first part of the Argentine Constitution” under the terms of article 75, item 22, but attributed to the international treaties a character of complementarity, in addition to the prohibition, provided for in article 27 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, to invoke reasons of domestic law for non-compliance in order to comply with international obligations. For the preparation of this scientific article, the deductive method and qualitative and descriptive research were used. As bibliographic references were used published materials, scientific literature, Law and Jurisprudence that were relevant to the purposes discussed here.

The Conservatism of the European Court of Humans Rights Regarding Abortions on Demand

2015 ◽  
pp. 185-196
Author(s):  
Pitsou Anastasia
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Right To Privacy ◽  
Right To Life ◽  
On Demand ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right

In this chapter, the authors negotiate the fact that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) missed the opportunity to recognize the right to abortion under specific criteria that are harmonized with the right to life and the right to privacy. It obviously remains a triumph of nationalism and of religious power over human dignity.

Enhancing Constitutional Justice by Using External References: The European Court of Human Rights’ Reasoning on the Protection against Expulsion

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-322
Author(s):  
ANUSCHEH FARAHAT
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Protection Scheme ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
Historical View ◽  
European Court ◽  
Constitutional Justice ◽  
Individual Justice ◽  
The Right ◽  
Changing Role

AbstractThis article argues that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) uses external references as a tool to enhance ‘constitutional justice’. This technique is illustrated by the Court's contribution to an important shift in migration law beginning in the late 1980s and resulting in an enhanced scheme for protection against expulsion in Europe. This shift reflects the changing role of the ECtHR from a court primarily concerned with providing ‘individual justice’ to a court aiming at enabling ‘constitutional justice’. The aim of the article is to contextualize the aforementioned shift with a historical view and to understand it in methodological terms. It argues that the Court supports its dynamic interpretation of the right to privacy in Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights in crucial judgments by reference to often non-binding instruments issued by the Council of Europe and to other human rights treaties. In this regard, the case of protection against expulsion illustrates a particular feature of the Court's turn to ‘constitutional justice’, namely the increased application of the principle of systemic integration. This allowed the Court to develop a meaningful and comprehensive protection scheme in the first place. However, the article reveals that once the substantial standard developed by the ECtHR has been formally implemented in domestic law, domestic decisions are reviewed with significantly less scrutiny. This limitation may again be explained by the ‘constitutional turn’ which results in a pragmatic tendency to proceduralization in the jurisprudence of the ECtHR.

scholarly journals Predictive analytics in crime prevention and the European Convention on Human Rights: tackling risks in privacy and fair trial frameworks

2021 ◽  
pp. 225-250
Author(s):  
Donatas Murauskas
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Crime Prevention ◽  
Predictive Analytics ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Conceptual Issue ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Right

In this paper, I discuss whether the European Convention on Human Rights provides safeguards to individuals affected by predictive analytics in crime prevention. I start with depicting a conceptual issue that worries legal scholars – the trend of law-enforcement authorities to increase their attention to crime prevention rather than traditional criminal investigations. Then, I dive into the right to privacy case-law of the European Court of Human Rights looking for the Court’s references to the threats of data processing. Lastly, I select concrete cases of the European Court of Human Rights on the right to a fair trial to show that the human rights safeguards are not yet developed to frame predictive analytics in crime prevention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document