Screening Solvents Based on Hansen Solubility Parameter Theory To Depolymerize Lignocellulosic Biomass Efficiently under Low Temperature

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 8678-8686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Zhang ◽  
Xuesong Tan ◽  
Wen Wang ◽  
Qiang Yu ◽  
Qiong Wang ◽  
...  
BioResources ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 7112-7121
Author(s):  
Jinyan Lang ◽  
Na Wang ◽  
Xinhui Wang ◽  
Yili Wang ◽  
Guorong Chen ◽  
...  

Based on the solubility parameter theory, the Hansen solubility parameters of various solvents were calculated and compared to predict the solubility of cellulose in various solvents, which illustrates the feasibility of Hansen solubility parameters to predict the solubility of cellulose in solvents. This paper aims to make a more accurate prediction in advance when finding suitable cellulose solvent system, and then to reduce the burden of cellulose solvent selection.


Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiao-Na Zhu ◽  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Yan-Biao Hu ◽  
Xawkat Abliz

The physicochemical properties of four 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([CnC1im]Br, n = 5, 6, 7, 8) ionic liquids (ILs) were investigated in this work by using inverse gas chromatography (IGC) from 303.15 K to 343.15 K. Twenty-eight organic solvents were used to obtain the physicochemical properties between each IL and solvent via the IGC method, including the specific retention volume and the Flory–Huggins interaction parameter. The Hildebrand solubility parameters of the four [CnC1im]Br ILs were determined by linear extrapolation to be δ 2 ( [ C 5 C 1 im ] Br ) = 25.78 (J·cm−3)0.5, δ 2 ( [ C 6 C 1 im ] Br ) = 25.38 (J·cm−3)0.5, δ 2 ( [ C 7 C 1 im ] Br ) =24.78 (J·cm−3)0.5 and δ 2 ( [ C 8 C 1 im ] Br ) = 24.23 (J·cm−3)0.5 at room temperature (298.15 K). At the same time, the Hansen solubility parameters of the four [CnC1im]Br ILs were simulated by using the Hansen Solubility Parameter in Practice (HSPiP) at room temperature (298.15 K). The results were as follows: δ t ( [ C 5 C 1 im ] Br ) = 25.86 (J·cm−3)0.5, δ t ( [ C 6 C 1 im ] Br ) = 25.39 (J·cm−3)0.5, δ t ( [ C 7 C 1 im ] Br ) = 24.81 (J·cm−3)0.5 and δ t ( [ C 8 C 1 im ] Br ) = 24.33 (J·cm−3)0.5. These values were slightly higher than those obtained by the IGC method, but they only exhibited small errors, covering a range of 0.01 to 0.1 (J·cm−3)0.5. In addition, the miscibility between the IL and the probe was evaluated by IGC, and it exhibited a basic agreement with the HSPiP. This study confirms that the combination of the two methods can accurately calculate solubility parameters and select solvents.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 4869-4869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanrui Ran ◽  
Fergal Byrne ◽  
Ian D. V. Ingram ◽  
Michael North

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Opoku ◽  
Benjamin Nketia-Yawson ◽  
Eun-Sol Shin ◽  
Yong-Young Noh

Based on Hansen solubility parameter analysis, this study employed a non-halogenated binary solvent blend of mesitylene and acetophenone to closely mimic the efficiency of dichlorobenzene, for widely used conjugated polymers used for OFETs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document