Volatile Composition of Four Southern Highbush Blueberry Cultivars and Effect of Growing Location and Harvest Date

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (15) ◽  
pp. 8347-8357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofen Du ◽  
Anne Plotto ◽  
Mei Song ◽  
James Olmstead ◽  
Russell Rouseff
HortScience ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (7) ◽  
pp. 835-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Gilbert ◽  
Michael L. Schwieterman ◽  
Thomas A. Colquhoun ◽  
David G. Clark ◽  
James W. Olmstead

Previously, when selecting for flavor in the University of Florida southern highbush blueberry (SHB, Vaccinium corymbosum L. hybrids) breeding program, sugar/acid ratios and breeder preference were the only factors considered. A more precise method of evaluating flavor would include volatile compounds that may also contribute to the flavor experience. Therefore, volatile profiles of five SHB cultivars (Farthing, FL01-173, Scintilla, Star, and Sweetcrisp) were compared using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. All cultivars were harvested on four separate dates within the harvest season, and fruit from each cultivar were also harvested at four developmental stages on the first harvest date. Among the cultivars, soluble solids content and volatile production tended to increase with fruit maturity, whereas titratable acidity decreased. All volatile components were more variable than measures of sugars and acids during the harvest season. Many of the volatiles present varied significantly between harvest dates, resulting in significant genotype × environment interactions during the harvest season. A closer examination of linalool, trans-2-hexenol, trans-2-hexenal, hexanal, and 1-penten-3-ol, five volatile compounds commonly associated with blueberry flavor, showed cultivar, developmental stage, and harvest date differences for each volatile. ‘Star’ experienced the least variation through the harvest period.


1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maristella Vanoli ◽  
Costanza Visai ◽  
Anna Rizzolo

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. C12
Author(s):  
Danielle O. Rosensteel ◽  
Ashfaq A. Sial

2015 ◽  
Vol 140 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisson P. Kovaleski ◽  
Jeffrey G. Williamson ◽  
James W. Olmstead ◽  
Rebecca L. Darnell

Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) production is increasing worldwide, particularly in subtropical growing regions, but information on timing and extent of inflorescence bud development during summer and fall and effects on bloom the next season are limited. The objectives of this study were to determine time of inflorescence bud initiation, describe internal inflorescence bud development, and determine the relationship between internal inflorescence bud development and bloom period the next spring in two southern highbush blueberry [SHB (Vaccinium corymbosum interspecific hybrids)] cultivars. ‘Emerald’ and ‘Jewel’ SHB buds were collected beginning in late summer until shoot growth cessation in late fall for dissection and identification of organ development. Inflorescence bud frequency and number, vegetative and inflorescence bud length and width throughout development, and bloom were also assessed. Inflorescence bud initiation occurred earlier in ‘Emerald’ compared with ‘Jewel’. Five stages of internal inflorescence bud development were defined throughout fall in both cultivars, ranging from a vegetative meristem to early expansion of the inflorescence bud in late fall. ‘Emerald’ inflorescence buds were larger and bloomed earlier, reflecting the earlier inflorescence bud initiation and development. Although inflorescence bud initiation occurred earlier in ‘Emerald’ compared with ‘Jewel’, the pattern of development was not different. Timing of inflorescence bud initiation influenced timing of bloom with earlier initiation resulting in earlier bloom.


Author(s):  
Yang Fang ◽  
Gerardo H. Nunez ◽  
Mariana Neves da Silva ◽  
Douglas A. Phillips ◽  
Patricio R. Munoz

Southern highbush blueberry plantations have been expanded into worldwide non-traditional growing areas with elite cultivars and improved horticultural practices. This article presents a comprehensive review of current production systems – alternatives to traditional open field production – such as production in protected environments, high-density plantings, evergreen production, and container-based production. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each system and compare their differences to the open field production. In addition, potential solutions have been provided for some of the disadvantages. We also highlight some of the gaps existing between academic studies and production in industry, providing a guide for future academic research. All these alternative systems have shown the potential to produce high yields with high quality berries. Alternative systems, compared to the field production, require higher establishment investments and thus create an entry barrier for new producers. Nevertheless, with their advantages, alternative productions have potential to be profitable.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 841-851 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Chen ◽  
Lingling Qiu ◽  
Haipeng Guo ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Huwei Yuan ◽  
...  

HortScience ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-740
Author(s):  
John R. Clark ◽  
Alejandra Salgado ◽  
Arlen Draper ◽  
Chad E. Finn ◽  
Paul Sandefur ◽  
...  

Plant Disease ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 94 (8) ◽  
pp. 966-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. F. Wright ◽  
P. F. Harmon

Stem blight of southern highbush blueberry (SHB) results in premature plant mortality and has been identified by Florida blueberry growers as the economically most important disease for the industry. In 2007, plants with stem blight and dieback symptoms were sampled at 4-month intervals from two farms located in Alachua and Polk Co., FL. In all, 30 cane samples (stem blight) and 30 crown segments (dieback) were collected at each sample date and each location. In total, 360 samples were collected; fungal species in the family Botryosphaeriaceae were isolated from 85% of the samples. Based on morphology and phylogenetic analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region and elongation factor 1-α (EF1-α) sequences, two dominant species recovered from SHB in Florida were identified: Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Neofusicoccum ribis. Species isolation was independent of location, symptom type, and time of year. Additional samplings are needed to investigate population change over multiple years and in the rest of the southeastern United States. Breeding for resistance and management of stem blight and dieback in Florida should focus on these two fungal species.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document