Comparison of stir-bar sorptive extraction-GC-MS and solid-phase micro-extraction -GC-MS for volatile phenol analysis in wine to assess the smoke impact

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruiwen Yang ◽  
Armando Alcazar ◽  
YanPing Qian ◽  
Michael Qian
Keyword(s):  
Solid Phase ◽  
Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Solid Phase Micro Extraction ◽  
Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Volatile Phenol

Technological Developments in the Determination of Emerging Contaminants in Water

2020 ◽  
pp. 81-108
Author(s):  
Magali Kemmerich
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Contaminants ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Food Additives ◽  
Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Low Concentrations ◽  
Gas And Liquid Chromatography ◽  
Technological Developments ◽  
Dispersive Liquid Liquid Microextraction

Emerging contaminants (ECs), which constitute a group of chemicals, such as personal care products, food additives, and endocrine disruptors, are not commonly monitored and have the potential to cause adverse effects on the environment and humans. In water, even at low concentrations, they pose risks to environmental health. Several technologies have been developed to determine these compounds; the most common ones are liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) with analysis by gas and liquid chromatography (GC and LC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS). This chapter analyzes these methodologies and highlights their possibilities and limitations and compiles the most recent advances in this field.

Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for the Analysis of Environmental Estrogen Bisphenol A

2014 ◽  
Vol 894 ◽  
pp. 143-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Gang Xu
Keyword(s):  
Sample Preparation ◽  
Bisphenol A ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Selective Adsorption ◽  
Membrane Extraction ◽  
Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Molecularly Imprinted ◽  
Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Molecularly Imprinted Membrane ◽  
Preparation Techniques

Molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) has the characteristics of predetermination, specific recognition and practicability. It can eliminate the interference of complicated matrix. It has been widely used as selective adsorption material in sample preparation. Bisphenol A is a common endocrine disruptor in environment. Its toxic effects and analysis have attracted widespread concern. In this paper, the molecularly imprinted sample preparation techniques for bisphenol A were comprehensively reported, including molecularly imprinted microspheres extraction, molecularly imprinted solid phase extraction, molecularly imprinted solid phase microextraction, molecularly imprinted stir bar sorptive extraction and molecularly imprinted membrane extraction. Moreover, the trends of BPA-molecularly imprinted techniques are prospected.

scholarly journals Stir bar-sorptive extraction, solid phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction for levetiracetam determination in human plasma: comparing recovery rates

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila Freitas-Lima ◽  
Flavia Isaura Santi Ferreira ◽  
Carlo Bertucci ◽  
Veriano Alexandre Júnior ◽  
Sônia Aparecida Carvalho Dreossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Phase Extraction ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Phase Extraction ◽  
Recovery Rates ◽  
Sorptive Extraction ◽  
Liquid Liquid Extraction ◽  
Relative Standard

<p>Levetiracetam (LEV), an antiepileptic drug (AED) with favorable pharmacokinetic profile, is increasingly being used in clinical practice, although information on its metabolism and disposition are still being generated. Therefore a simple, robust and fast liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography method is described that could be used for both pharmacokinetic and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) purposes. Moreover, recovery rates of LEV in plasma were compared among LLE, stir bar-sorptive extraction (SBSE), and solid-phase extraction (SPE). Solvent extraction with dichloromethane yielded a plasma residue free from usual interferences such as commonly co-prescribed AEDs, and recoveries around 90% (LLE), 60% (SPE) and 10% (SBSE). Separation was obtained using reverse phase Select B column with ultraviolet detection (235 nm). Mobile phase consisted of methanol:sodium acetate buffer 0.125 M pH 4.4 (20:80, v/v). The method was linear over a range of 2.8-220.0 µg mL<sup>-1</sup>. The intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy were studied at three concentrations; relative standard deviation was less than 10%. The limit of quantification was 2.8 µg mL<sup>-1</sup>. This robust method was successfully applied to analyze plasma samples from patients with epilepsy and therefore might be used for pharmacokinetic and TDM purposes.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document