<p>Even if surface warming could be kept below 2.0&#176;C or 1.5&#176;C by 2100, global sea-level rise will occur&#160;for several centuries or even millennia. One possible interpretation of a successful climate policy for the next few decades could be that it should avoid global-warming induced impacts on climate, ecosystems and human societies not only within this century, but also for the next centuries and beyond. Here, we perform a proof-of-concept study to introduce a constraint on SLR as a new climate target and compare the economic impact to that of a corresponding temperature target.</p><p>In the 21st yearly session of the Conference of the Parties in Paris in 2015, SLR threats to the Small Island Developing States (SIDS) prompted a commitment to strive for a lower global temperature target goal of limiting surface warming below 1.5&#176;C. However, an SLR target more directly relates to their existential threats. We here substantially augmented the climate model of&#160;the optimizing climate-energy-economy model MIND (Model of Investment and Technological Development) from an impulse-response model to a three-layer ocean model with much-improved representation of ocean heat uptake. We introduce a global total SLR model with four components, one due to ocean thermal expansion, one due to Greenland ice-sheet melting, one due to Antarctic ice-sheet melting, and one due to mountain glaciers and ice cap melting. The newly developed integrated-assessment framework has enabled us to investigate, for the first time, a sea-level rise climate target.</p><p>Our results emphasize a key effect of carbon emissions pathways on the future SLR after the 21st century. The shape of carbon emissions pathways will strongly influence future SLR after the 21st century and generally affect SIDS over centuries. To reduce SLR-induced impacts on SIDS, a target is required that not only keeps surface warming below a certain level but also reduces surface warming substantially thereafter. We find that a global SLR target will provide a more sustainable and a lower-cost solution to limit both short-term and long-term climate changes for stakeholders who primarily care about SLR among all global warming impact categories compared to a temperature target with the same SLR by 2200.</p><p>We find that the SLR target can provide a temperature overshoot profile through a physical constraint rather than arbitrarily defining an overshoot range of temperature as acceptable. Temperature targets with a limited overshoot have been invoked to make the 2.0&#176; and 1.5&#176;C targets feasible in the context of real-world United Nations climate policy; however, rational constraints on the temperature overshoot have been unclear. SLR targets can be viewed as a reinterpretation of the 2.0&#176; and 1.5&#176;C targets and can provide a rational justification of a certain temperature overshoot for stakeholders who primarily care about SLR. Our present framework with reinterpretation of the widely agreed temperature targets can, in principle, be transferred from SLR targets to impact-related climate targets and can be used to identify a more sustainable path toward meeting the Paris Agreement.</p>
How warming and steric sea level rise relate to cumulative carbon emissions
