Slip distribution and footwall topography of the Yanggao‐Tianzhen Fault (northern Shanxi Graben): implications for the along‐strike variations in fault activity and regional deformation

Tectonics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanxing Luo ◽  
Chuanyou Li ◽  
Xinnan Li ◽  
Guangxue Ren ◽  
Jinyuan Dong
Keyword(s):  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Fault Activity ◽  
Regional Deformation

FAULT SLIP DISTRIBUTION ALONG THE SOUTHERN 15 KM OF THE M7.1 RIDGECREST EARTHQUAKE SURFACE RUPTURE

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sinan O. Akciz ◽  
◽  
Salena Padilla ◽  
James F. Dolan ◽  
Alex E. Hatem
Keyword(s):  
Fault Slip ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Surface Rupture ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution

Enhanced Regional Deformation at the Anterior Papillary Muscle Insertion Site After Chordal Transsection

Circulation ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuo Takayama ◽  
Jeffrey W. Holmes ◽  
Ian LeGrice ◽  
James W. Covell
Keyword(s):  
Papillary Muscle ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Regional Deformation ◽  
Muscle Insertion ◽  
Anterior Papillary Muscle

Inferred fault geometry and slip distribution of the 2010 Jiashian, Taiwan, earthquake is consistent with a thick-skinned deformation model

2011 ◽  
Vol 301 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 78-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-En Ching ◽  
Kaj M. Johnson ◽  
Ruey-Juin Rau ◽  
Ray Y. Chuang ◽  
Long-Chen Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Deformation Model ◽  
Fault Geometry ◽  
Taiwan Earthquake

scholarly journals Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Gao ◽  
HuRong Duan ◽  
YongZhi Zhang ◽  
JiaYing Chen ◽  
HeTing Jian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strike Slip ◽  
Fault Slip ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Synthetic Aperture ◽  
Seismic Events ◽  
Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar ◽  
The Past ◽  
Dextral Strike Slip Fault ◽  
Fault Slip Distribution ◽  
Dextral Strike Slip

AbstractThe 2019 Ridgecrest, California seismic sequence, including an Mw6.4 foreshock and Mw7.1 mainshock, represent the largest regional seismic events within the past 20 years. To obtain accurate coseismic fault-slip distribution, we used precise positioning data of small earthquakes from January 2019 to October 2020 to determine the dip parameters of the eight fault geometry, and used the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data processed by Xu et al. (Seismol Res Lett 91(4):1979–1985, 2020) at UCSD to constrain inversion of the fault-slip distribution of both earthquakes. The results showed that all faults were sinistral strike-slips with minor dip-slip components, exception for dextral strike-slip fault F2. Fault-slip mainly occurred at depths of 0–12 km, with a maximum slip of 3.0 m. The F1 fault contained two slip peaks located at 2 km of fault S4 and 6 km of fault S5 depth, the latter being located directly above the Mw7.1hypocenter. Two slip peaks with maximum slip of 1.5 m located 8 and 20 km from the SW endpoint of the F2 fault were also identified, and the latter corresponds to the Mw6.4 earthquake. We also analyzed the influence of different inversion parameters on the fault slip distribution, and found that the slip momentum smoothing condition was more suitable for the inversion of the earthquakes slip distribution than the stress-drop smoothing condition.

scholarly journals The waveform inversion of mainshock and aftershock data of the 2006 M6.3 Yogyakarta earthquake

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hijrah Saputra ◽  
Wahyudi Wahyudi ◽  
Iman Suardi ◽  
Ade Anggraini ◽  
Wiwit Suryanto
Keyword(s):  
Joint Inversion ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Near Field ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Moment Tensor Inversion ◽  
Slip Distribution ◽  
Aftershock Distribution ◽  
Velocity Models

AbstractThis study comprehensively investigates the source mechanisms associated with the mainshock and aftershocks of the Mw = 6.3 Yogyakarta earthquake which occurred on May 27, 2006. The process involved using moment tensor inversion to determine the fault plane parameters and joint inversion which were further applied to understand the spatial and temporal slip distributions during the earthquake. Moreover, coseismal slip distribution was overlaid with the relocated aftershock distribution to determine the stress field variations around the tectonic area. Meanwhile, the moment tensor inversion made use of near-field data and its Green’s function was calculated using the extended reflectivity method while the joint inversion used near-field and teleseismic body wave data which were computed using the Kikuchi and Kanamori methods. These data were filtered through a trial-and-error method using a bandpass filter with frequency pairs and velocity models from several previous studies. Furthermore, the Akaike Bayesian Information Criterion (ABIC) method was applied to obtain more stable inversion results and different fault types were discovered. Strike–slip and dip-normal were recorded for the mainshock and similar types were recorded for the 8th aftershock while the 9th and 16th June were strike slips. However, the fault slip distribution from the joint inversion showed two asperities. The maximum slip was 0.78 m with the first asperity observed at 10 km south/north of the mainshock hypocenter. The source parameters discovered include total seismic moment M0 = 0.4311E + 19 (Nm) or Mw = 6.4 with a depth of 12 km and a duration of 28 s. The slip distribution overlaid with the aftershock distribution showed the tendency of the aftershock to occur around the asperities zone while a normal oblique focus mechanism was found using the joint inversion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document