Stratospheric Gravity Waves as a Proxy for Hurricane Intensification: a Case Study of WRF Simulation for Hurricane Joaquin

Author(s):  
Xue Wu ◽  
Lars Hoffmann ◽  
Corwin J. Wright ◽  
Neil P. Hindley ◽  
Silvio Kalisch ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Wu ◽  
Lars Hoffmann ◽  
Corwin James Wright ◽  
Neil P Hindley ◽  
Silvio Kalisch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Wu ◽  
Lars Hoffmann ◽  
Corwin James Wright ◽  
Neil P Hindley ◽  
Silvio Kalisch ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 2804-2830 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Stobie ◽  
Franco Einaudi ◽  
Louis W. Uccellini

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Dörnbrack

<table><tbody><tr><td> <p><span>Planetary waves disturbed the hitherto stable Arctic stratospheric polar vortex mid of<br>January 2016 in such a way that unique tropospheric and stratospheric flow conditions<br>for vertically and horizontally propagating mountain waves developed. Co-existing<br>strong low-level westerly winds across almost all European mountain ranges plus the<br>almost zonally-aligned polar front jet created these favorable conditions for deeply<br>propagating gravity waves. Furthermore, the northward displacement of the polar night<br>jet resulted in a wide-spread coverage of stratospheric mountain waves trailling across<br>northern Europe. This paper describes the particular meteorological setting by<br>analyzing the tropospheric and stratospheric flows based on the ERA5 data. The<br>potential of the flow for exciting internal gravity waves from non-orographic sources is<br>evaluated across all altitudes by considering various instability indices as δ , Ro, Ro ζ , Ro<sub>⊥</sub> ,<br>and Δ NBE</span><span>. </span></p> <p><span>The analyzed gravity waves are described and characterized in terms of<br>commonly used parameters. The main finding of this case study is the exceptionally<br>vast extension of the mountain waves trailing to high latitudes originating from the flow<br>across the mountainous sources that are located at about 45 N. As a useful addition to<br>the case study, tracks for potential research flights are proposed that sample the<br>waves by a vertically pointing airborne remote-sensing instrument. Benefits and<br>drawbacks of the different approaches to observe the meridional focussing of the<br>mountain waves into the polar night jet are discussed.</span></p> </td> </tr></tbody></table><p> </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 3449-3480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianandrea Mannarini ◽  
Lorenzo Carelli

Abstract. The latest development of the ship-routing model published in Mannarini et al. (2016a) is VISIR-1.b, which is presented here. The new version of the model targets large ocean-going vessels by considering both ocean surface gravity waves and currents. To effectively analyse currents in a graph-search method, new equations are derived and validated against an analytical benchmark. A case study in the Atlantic Ocean is presented, focussing on a route from the Chesapeake Bay to the Mediterranean Sea and vice versa. Ocean analysis fields from data-assimilative models (for both ocean state and hydrodynamics) are used. The impact of waves and currents on transatlantic crossings is assessed through mapping of the spatial variability in the tracks, an analysis of their kinematics, and their impact on the Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI) of the International Maritime Organization. Sailing with or against the main ocean current is distinguished. The seasonal dependence of the EEOI savings is evaluated, and greater savings with a higher intra-monthly variability during winter crossings are indicated in the case study. The total monthly mean savings are between 2 % and 12 %, while the contribution of ocean currents is between 1 % and 4 %. Several other ocean routes are also considered, providing a pan-Atlantic scenario assessment of the potential gains in energy efficiency from optimal tracks, linking them to regional meteo-oceanographic features.


2014 ◽  
Vol 402 ◽  
pp. 346-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine D. de Groot-Hedlin ◽  
Michael A.H. Hedlin ◽  
Kristoffer T. Walker
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 98 (D5) ◽  
pp. 8611-8638 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Pfister ◽  
K. R. Chan ◽  
T. P. Bui ◽  
S. Bowen ◽  
M. Legg ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 969-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Blum ◽  
K. H. Fricke ◽  
G. Baumgarten ◽  
A. Schöch

Abstract. Atmospheric gravity waves have been the subject of intense research for several decades because of their extensive effects on the atmospheric circulation and the temperature structure. The U. Bonn lidar at the Esrange and the ALOMAR RMR lidar at the Andøya Rocket Range are located in northern Scandinavia 250 km apart on either side of the Scandinavian mountain ridge. During January and February 2003 both lidar systems conducted measurements and retrieved atmospheric temperatures. On 19/20 January 2003 simultaneous measurements for more than 7 h were possible. Although during most of the campaign time the atmosphere was not transparent for the propagation of orographically induced gravity waves, they could propagate and were observed at both lidar stations during these simultaneous measurements. The wave patterns at ALOMAR show a random distribution with time whereas at the Esrange a persistency in the wave patterns is observable. This persistency can also be found in the distribution of the most powerful vertical wavelengths. The mode values are both at about 5 km vertical wavelength, however the distributions are quite different, narrow at the Esrange containing values from λz=2–6 km and broad at ALOMAR, covering λz=1–12 km vertical wavelength. At both stations the waves deposit energy in the atmosphere with increasing altitude, which leads to a decrease of the observed gravity wave potential energy density with altitude. These measurements show unambigiously orographically induced gravity waves on both sides of the mountains as well as a clear difference of the characteristics of these waves, which might be caused by different excitation and propagation conditions on either side of the Scandinavian mountain ridge.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günther Zängl ◽  
Matthias Hornsteiner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document