Cloud-to-ground lightning flash characteristics in the contiguous United States: 1989–1991

1994 ◽  
Vol 99 (D5) ◽  
pp. 10833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Orville
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning

scholarly journals Diurnal Variations of NLDN-Reported Cloud-to-Ground Lightning in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
pp. 1037-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Holle
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Maximum Activity ◽  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Diurnal Changes ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning ◽  
Local Mean ◽  
Composite Maps ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract National maps of cloud-to-ground lightning flash density (in flashes per square kilometer per year) for one or more years have been produced since the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) was first deployed across the contiguous United States in 1989. However, no single publication includes maps of cloud-to-ground flash density across the domain and adjacent areas during the entire diurnal cycle. Cloud-to-ground lightning has strong and variable diurnal changes across the United States that should be taken into account for outdoor lightning-vulnerable activities, particularly those involving human safety. For this study, NLDN cloud-to-ground flash data were compiled in 20 km by 20 km grid squares from 2005 to 2012 for the lower 48 states. A unique feature of this study is that maps were prepared to coincide with local time, not time zones. NLDN flashes were assigned to 2-h time periods in 5° longitude bands. Composite maps of the 2-h periods with the most lightning in each grid square were also prepared. The afternoon from 1200 to 1800 local mean time provides two-thirds of the day’s lightning. However, lightning activity starts before noon over western mountains and onshore along the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts. These areas are where recurring lightning-vulnerable recreation and workplace activities should expect the threat at these times, rather than view them as an anomaly. An additional result of the study is the midday beginning of lightning over the higher terrain of the western states, then the maximum activity moves steadily eastward. These storms pose a threat to late-afternoon and evening recreation. In some Midwest and plains locations, lightning is most frequent after midnight.

scholarly journals Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Flash Density and Thunderstorm Day Distributions over the Contiguous United States Derived from NLDN Measurements: 1993–2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Koehler
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Precipitation Anomaly ◽  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Southern Rocky Mountains ◽  
Weather Observations ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Southern Florida

Abstract This study employs cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning flash data from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) to examine temporal and spatial distributions of lightning flash and thunderstorm day (TD) occurrences over the contiguous United States from 1993 to 2018. TD distributions are estimated from NLDN CG flashes using 4 thunder audibility approximations: 5 and 10 nautical mile (n mi; 1 n mi = 1.852 km) audibility ranges, and minima of 1 and 2 flashes within the audibility range. The 26-yr period examined is longer than previous studies using NLDN data, and the TD results can be compared directly to climatologies derived from surface weather observations dating back to the late 1890s. Results based on the abundant NLDN data avoid limitations introduced by the coarse horizontal resolution of surface observations inherent in pre-NLDN TD climatologies. Annual mean flash density and annual and monthly mean TD distributions are derived from almost 568 million NLDN CG flashes. A mean annual maximum of more than 16 flashes km−2 is found near Tampa, Florida. The mean annual TD maximum of 113 days (from at least 2 flashes within 10 n mi) occurs in southern Florida. Regions exceeding 70 TDs are found from eastern Texas eastward into Florida, and over the southern Rocky Mountains. Large positive deviations from the mean number of TDs extend from Texas northwestward into Colorado during 2003–07, followed by large negative deviations over the same region during 2008–12. Both deviation patterns are similar to expected summertime precipitation anomaly patterns over the United States during El Niño and La Niña years, respectively.

scholarly journals The Daily Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Flash Density in the Contiguous United States and Finland

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
pp. 1323-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antti Mäkelä ◽  
Pekka Rossi ◽  
David M. Schultz
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Detection Efficiency ◽  
Quantitative Measure ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Upper Midwest ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Operational Forecasting ◽  
Central United States ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning

A method is developed to quantify thunderstorm intensity according to cloud-to-ground lightning flashes (hereafter ground flashes) determined by a lightning-location sensor network. The method is based on the ground flash density ND per thunderstorm day (ground flashes per square kilometer per thunderstorm day) calculated on 20 km × 20 km fixed squares. Because the square size roughly corresponds to the area covered by a typical thunderstorm, the flash density for one square defines a unit thunderstorm for the purposes of this study. This method is tested with ground flash data obtained from two nationwide lightning-location systems: the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) in the contiguous United States and the portion of the Nordic Lightning Information System (NORDLIS) in Finland. The distribution of daily ground flash density ND is computed for all of Finland and four 800 000 km2 regions in the United States (identified as western, central, eastern, and Florida). Although Finland and all four U.S. regions have median values of ND of 0.01–0.03 flashes per square kilometer per thunderstorm day—indicating that most thunderstorms produce relatively few ground flashes regardless of geographical region—the most intense 1% of the storms (as measured by the 99th percentiles of the ND distributions within each region) show much larger differences among regions. For example, the most intense 1% of the ND distributions is 1.3 flashes per square kilometer per thunderstorm day in the central U.S. region, but only 0.2 flashes per square kilometer per thunderstorm day in Finland. The spatial distribution of the most intense 1% of the ND distributions illustrates that the most intense thunderstorm days occur in the central United States and upper Midwest, which differs from the maxima of the average annual flash density NA and the number of thunderstorm days TD, both of which occur in Florida and along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. This method for using ND to quantify thunderstorm intensity is applicable to any region as long as the detection efficiency of the lightning-location network is high enough or known. This method can also be employed in operational forecasting to provide a quantitative measure of the lightning intensity of thunderstorms relative to climatology.

scholarly journals Seasonal, Monthly, and Weekly Distributions of NLDN and GLD360 Cloud-to-Ground Lightning

2016 ◽  
Vol 144 (8) ◽  
pp. 2855-2870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Holle ◽  
Kenneth L. Cummins ◽  
William A. Brooks
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New England ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Time Space ◽  
Lightning Detection ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning ◽  
Annual Total ◽  
The Caribbean ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Annual maps of cloud-to-ground lightning flash density have been produced since the deployment of the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN). However, a comprehensive national summary of seasonal, monthly, and weekly lightning across the contiguous United States has not been developed. Cloud-to-ground lightning is not uniformly distributed in time, space, or frequency. Knowledge of these variations is useful for understanding meteorological processes responsible for lightning occurrence, planning outdoor events, anticipating impacts of lightning on power reliability, and relating to severe weather. To address this gap in documentation of lightning occurrence, the variability on seasonal, monthly, and weekly scales is first addressed with NLDN flash data from 2005 to 2014 for the 48 states and adjacent regions. Flash density and the percentage of each season’s portion of the annual total are compiled. In spring, thunderstorms occur most often over southeastern states. Lightning spreads north and west until by June, most areas have lightning. New England, the northern Rockies, most of Canada, and the Florida Peninsula have a small percentage of lightning outside of summer. Arizona and portions of adjacent states have the highest incidence in July and August. Flash densities reduce in September in most regions. This seasonal, monthly, and weekly overview complements a recent study of diurnal variations of flashes to document when and where lightning occurs over the United States. NLDN seasonal maps indicate a summer lightning dominance in the northern and western United States that extends into Canada using data compiled from GLD360 network observations. GLD360 also extends NLDN seasonal maps and percentages into Mexico, the Caribbean, and offshore regions.

Investigation of Zero Crossing Detection for First Return Stroke in Negative Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Flash

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Idil Abd Rahman ◽  
◽  
Muhammad Akmal Bahari ◽  
Zikri Abadi Baharudin ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Return Stroke ◽  
Zero Crossing ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning

scholarly journals Quantification of the effect of modeled lightning NO<sub>2</sub> on UV–visible air mass factors

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4403-4419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua L. Laughner ◽  
Ronald C. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Lightning Flash ◽  
Eastern United States ◽  
Ozone Monitoring Instrument ◽  
Reanalysis Dataset ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Air Mass ◽  
Convective Clouds

Abstract. Space-borne measurements of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO2) columns are up to 10x more sensitive to upper tropospheric (UT) NO2 than near-surface NO2 over low-reflectivity surfaces. Here, we quantify the effect of adding simulated lightning NO2 to the a priori profiles for NO2 observations from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) using modeled NO2 profiles from the Weather Research and Forecasting–Chemistry (WRF-Chem) model. With observed NO2 profiles from the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) aircraft campaign as observational truth, we quantify the bias in the NO2 column that occurs when lightning NO2 is not accounted for in the a priori profiles. Focusing on late spring and early summer in the central and eastern United States, we find that a simulation without lightning NO2 underestimates the air mass factor (AMF) by 25 % on average for common summer OMI viewing geometry and 35 % for viewing geometries that will be encountered by geostationary satellites. Using a simulation with 500 to 665 mol NO flash−1 produces good agreement with observed NO2 profiles and reduces the bias in the AMF to  <  ±4 % for OMI viewing geometries. The bias is regionally dependent, with the strongest effects in the southeast United States (up to 80 %) and negligible effects in the central US. We also find that constraining WRF meteorology to a reanalysis dataset reduces lightning flash counts by a factor of 2 compared to an unconstrained run, most likely due to changes in the simulated water vapor profile.

scholarly journals on the prevention of lighting

1969 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 514-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Stow
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Forest Fires ◽  
Western United States ◽  
Agricultural Crops ◽  
Loss Of Life ◽  
The World ◽  
Lightning Discharges ◽  
Cloud To Ground Lightning ◽  
Recreational Resources

The destructive nature of cloud-to-ground lightning strokes is well known. Loss of life and damage to buildings and other man-made structures may to a large extent be prevented by the judicial use of lightning conductors and screens but no comparable protection may be offered to expanses of agricultural crops or forests. According to Fuquay (1967) lightning is the greatest single cause of forest fires in the western United States: during the period 1946–1962, 140,000 such fires occurred causing severe losses of timber, wildlife, watershed, and recreational resources. Comparable losses occur regularly in other parts of the world. The only solution is the suppression or modification of cloud-to-ground lightning discharges. Methods of suppression are described, some of which may turn out to be practical ways of achieving this aim.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document