Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation models.

1989 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 625-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence J. la Du ◽  
J. S. Tanaka
Methodology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 137-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milica Miočević

Abstract. Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimation is a common estimation method in Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), and parameters in such analyses are interpreted using frequentist terms and definition of probability. It is also possible, and sometimes more advantageous ( Lee & Song, 2004 ; Rindskopf, 2012 ), to fit structural equation models in the Bayesian framework ( Kaplan & Depaoli, 2012 ; Levy & Choi, 2013 ; Scheines, Hoijtink, & Boomsma, 1999 ). Bayesian mediation analysis has been described for manifest variable models ( Enders, Fairchild, & MacKinnon, 2013 ; Yuan & MacKinnon, 2009 ). This tutorial outlines considerations in the analysis and interpretation of results for the single mediator model with latent variables. The reader is guided through model specification, estimation, and the interpretations of results obtained using two kinds of diffuse priors and one set of informative priors. Recommendations are made for applied researchers and annotated syntax is provided in R2OpenBUGS and Mplus. The target audience for this article are researchers wanting to learn how to fit the single mediator model as a Bayesian SEM.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1822-1833
Author(s):  
Murat DoÄŸan

In this study, Monte Carlo simulation is used to evaluate the characteristics of CFA fit indices under different conditions (such as sample size, estimation method and distributional conditions). The simulation study was performed using seven different samples where sample has a different sample size such as 50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 4000, four different estimation methods (Maximum Likelihood, Generalized Least Square, Least Square and Weighted Least Square) and three distribution conditions (normal, slightly non-normal and moderately non-normal). A simulation study was conducted with EQS software to examine the effect of these conditions on the most common eleven fit indices that are studied in CFA and SEM. As a result of this study, all of the factors studied are shown to have an influence on the fit indices.


Methodology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 138-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsien-Yuan Hsu ◽  
Susan Troncoso Skidmore ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Bruce Thompson

The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate the effect of constraining near-zero parameter cross-loadings to zero in the measurement component of a structural equation model. A Monte Carlo 3 × 5 × 2 simulation design was conducted (i.e., sample sizes of 200, 600, and 1,000; parameter cross-loadings of 0.07, 0.10, 0.13, 0.16, and 0.19 misspecified to be zero; and parameter path coefficients in the structural model of either 0.50 or 0.70). Results indicated that factor pattern coefficients and factor covariances were overestimated in measurement models when near-zero parameter cross-loadings constrained to zero were higher than 0.13 in the population. Moreover, the path coefficients between factors were misestimated when the near-zero parameter cross-loadings constrained to zero were noteworthy. Our results add to the literature detailing the importance of testing individual model specification decisions, and not simply evaluating omnibus model fit statistics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document