scholarly journals A mutual acculturation model of multicultural campus climate and acceptance of diversity.

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 468-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha J. Simmons ◽  
Michele A. Wittig ◽  
Sheila K. Grant
2013 ◽  
Vol 221 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Horenczyk ◽  
Inga Jasinskaja-Lahti ◽  
David L. Sam ◽  
Paul Vedder

This paper focuses on processes and consequences of intergroup interactions in plural societies, focusing primarily on majority-minority mutuality in acculturation orientations. We examine commonalities and differences among conceptualizations and models addressing issues of mutuality. Our review includes the mutual acculturation model ( Berry, 1997 ), the Interactive Acculturation Model (IAM – Bourhis et al., 1997 ), the Concordance Model of Acculturation (CMA – Piontkowski et al., 2002 ); the Relative Acculturation Extended Model (RAEM – Navas et al., 2005 ), and the work on acculturation discrepancies conducted by Horenczyk (1996 , 2000 ). We also describe a trend toward convergence of acculturation research and the socio-psychological study of intergroup relations addressing issues of mutuality in attitudes, perceptions, and expectations. Our review has the potential to enrich the conceptual and methodological toolbox needed for understanding and investigating acculturation in complex modern societies, where majorities and minorities, immigrants and nationals, are engaged in continuous mutual contact and interaction, affecting each other’s acculturative choices and acculturative expectations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 484-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mike Hoa Nguyen ◽  
Jason Chan ◽  
Bach Mai Dolly Nguyen ◽  
Robert T. Teranishi

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Gottlieb ◽  
Mitchell M. Handelsman ◽  
Samuel Knapp

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Davis ◽  
Melanie Matthews ◽  
Grayson Smith ◽  
Carla Shirley

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn M. Szymanski ◽  
Danielle Bissonette

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth F. Desnoyers-Colas

The road a predominantly white institution (PWI) takes to maximize diversity, inclusion, and equity can be fraught with challenges. One midsize institution learned through an assessment of its campus climate that its institutional practices and arrangements impeded diversity, inclusion, and equity despite white administrators' beliefs to the contrary. To help quell systemic racism habits, monthly campus-wide workshops focused on several key racial injustice habits and hurtful microaggressions generated from white privilege. A faux social justice allure to white allies who considered themselves advocates of nondominant people is one that should ultimately call into question the genuineness and true nature of their support. This semi-autoethnographic essay is a plaintive call to white colleagues in the academy to earnestly acknowledge white privilege and to use it to actively fight the destructive force of racial battle fatigue and institutional racism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document