June 1, 2000: National report: Kansas program rates high for making services available for children with serious emotional disturbance

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Friedman ◽  
Judith W. Katz-Leavy ◽  
Ronald W. Manderscheid ◽  
Diane L. Sondheimer

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 3728-3738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Greif Green ◽  
Ziming Xuan ◽  
Lana Kwong ◽  
Jeffrey A. Anderson ◽  
Philip J. Leaf

1994 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 254-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elana Esterson Rock ◽  
Michael S. Rosenberg ◽  
Deborah T. Carran

This study examined educational program and teacher variables to identify factors that predict the reintegration of students with serious emotional disturbance (SED) into less restrictive placements. Data on program demographics, reintegration orientation, teacher reintegration training, and teacher attitudes toward reintegration were collected from 162 special education teachers and 31 administrators in restrictive placements for K-12 students with SED. This information was compared to the reintegration rates of students in those schools through the use of a hierarchical set regression analysis. Results indicated that reintegration orientation, demographic characteristics of restrictive SED programs, and particular experiences/training of special educators predict the reintegration of students with SED into less restrictive programs.


1996 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie Doren ◽  
Michael Bullis ◽  
Michael. R. Benz

This study explored predictors of victimization experiences on a sample of adolescents with disabilities while in school and 1 year after leaving school, through phone interviews of students and parents. Logistic regression analyses revealed that people with serious emotional disturbance who demonstrated low personal/social achievement skills were more likely to experience victimization sometime in their school career than were people with other disabilities and higher personal/social skills. Variables affecting victimization rates 1 year out of school included prior victimization (while in school), gender (females were more likely to be victimized), and arrest record of people with serious emotional disturbance after leaving school.


1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip L. Gunter ◽  
R. Kenton Denny ◽  
Susan L. Jack ◽  
Richard E. Shores ◽  
C. Michael Nelson

This manuscript presents a review of the growing body of research concerning the influence of negative reinforcement on student and teacher behaviors. Negative reinforcement strengthens behaviors that result in escape from, or avoidance of, aversive stimuli. It is argued that negative reinforcement is a variable in the academic interactions of students with serious emotional disturbance and their teachers, Although both desired and undesired behaviors may be outcomes of negative reinforcement, because of the academic deficiencies of students with serious emotional disturbance and the instructional behaviors of their teachers, the escape and avoidance behaviors exhibited by these students more often may be undesired. The authors call for research to investigate sources of aversive stimuli within academic interactions between teachers and students with serious emotional disturbance as well as the potentially aversive stimuli present in academic activities. Implications for teaching practices also are presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document