Relationship Building in Research and Intervention with Multicultural Community Populations: Increasing Ecological Validity in Community Research: Contributions of Methodology and Research Design

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Lavome Robinson ◽  
Keisha Paxton ◽  
Frank Holiwski ◽  
Mary Case
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Seifert

Abstract Background and Objectives Empirical evidence suggests that the concept of “neighboring” (i.e., social contact and social support within a neighborhood) is related to between-person differences in well-being among older adults. However, little is known about the within-person differences in older adults’ everyday lives, which limits the ecological validity of prior findings. This study examined within-person associations between neighboring and the existence of positive valence, loneliness, and attachment to one’s neighborhood. Research Design and Methods The sample consisted of 4,620 observations of 20 days, drawn from 77 adults aged between 61 and 90 years. A mobile application on a smartphone was used for data collection. Results The results of the multilevel analysis suggest that daily contact with one’s neighbors was not significantly associated with daily positive valence, but it was positively related to daily feelings of not being alone and daily attachment to one’s neighborhood. Discussion and Implications The study makes noteworthy contributions to the field of gerontology by applying a micro-longitudinal research design to assess real-life within-person information.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shery Mead ◽  
Beth Filson

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how mutuality and shared power in relationship can avoid coercion and force in mental health treatment. Design/methodology/approach This is not a research design. It is rather an opinion piece with extensive examples of the approach. Findings The authors have found that using these processes can enable connection; the key to relationship building. Originality/value This paper is totally original and stands to offer the field, a new perspective.


Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1417
Author(s):  
Danielle Resiak ◽  
Elias Mpofu ◽  
Roderick Rothwell

(1) Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) and needle and syringe program (NSP) providers increasingly partner with researchers to explore harm reduction best practice. However, a paucity of research exists regarding how best to engage PWID and community NSP providers to generate the evidence for sustainable harm reduction services. (2) Aim: This study reports on our use of an organic community research partnership-building approach between researchers, NSP providers, and PWID in Canberra ACT, Australia. (3) Method: Survey participants included both PWID (n = 70) and NSP providers (n = 26) across primary (n = 2), secondary (n = 7), and outreach (n = 1) services in Canberra ACT. Applying an organic partnership-building strategy, we engaged with partners and adapted approaches according to information gained in the process of implementation. (4) Results: We found engaging in relationship building around partner priority activities created mutual understanding and trust premised in authenticity of the evolving partnership. Our organic approach, which included a partner audit of the research tools for relevance, resulted in high acceptance and enrolment into the research by NSP providers and PWID. Finally, we observed strong social capital building utilizing an organic approach for the sustainability of the partnership. (5) Conclusions: The results of this study provide evidence for the benefits of organic collaborative research partnership building with NSP providers and PWID for authentic service program implementation. Our approach to research partnership building resulted in strong relationships built on shared goals and objectives, mutual gains, and complementary expertise. We propose the wider use of organic approaches to developing collaborative research partnerships with NSP providers and PWID to enhance consumer responsiveness towards service provision.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha Nowland

Recent personality literature has proposed that Cronbach’s generalisability theory offers a substantive ground for the integration of inter-individual differences and intra¬personal process approaches to personality trait research. Generalisability theory has the advantage of maximising psychometric dependability of behavioural measurements, but does not demand reconciliation to the environment that is relevant to the life circumstances of the participant. A conceptual analysis contrasting generalisability theory with Egon Brunswik’s conceptual framework for psychology is presented. Recommendations regarding the connection between theory and methodological practice follow, in light of an evolutionary approach to personality and individual differences. An example that highlights the contrast between Cronbachian and Brunswikian approaches is presented, resulting in a recommendation to revisit the concept of ecological validity and representational research design, to better account for what is reflected in study outcomes for personality constructs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document