Clinical Efficacy of Naltrexone: A One Year Follow Up

Author(s):  
Richard Resnick ◽  
Michael Aronoff ◽  
Greta Lonborg ◽  
Richard Kestenbaum ◽  
Frank Kauders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanlong Zhong ◽  
Benyu Tang ◽  
Qi Lai ◽  
Yonghong Sheng ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundFew reports have been conducted to comparing surgical results and safety evaluations between the different types of infections in geriatric patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment for thoracolumbar infections in elderly patients.Methods21 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) and 26 patients with tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TS) were enrolled in the study. All patients were treated using one-stage posterior debridement, decompression, and pedicle screw fixation. Comparison of operative safety parameters between the two groups. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) score, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, the short form (SF)-36 survey and Oswestry disability index (ODI) to determine patient quality of life pre- and post-operatively. Results Hospitalisation and intensive care unit duration in the PS group were significantly shorter than in the TS group (P<0.05). The total incidence of post-operative complications for both groups was 44.7%. More complications occurred in the TS group, but the difference was not significant. The VAS and SF-36 scores (physical component) were significantly better in the PS group six months post-operatively, and the SF-36 (mental component) scores were significantly better in the PS group at the one-year follow-up. Neurological status in both groups improved post-operatively, and 83% of the patients were satisfied with the results of their operation. Imaging results showed that bone graft fusion improved in both groups at six months, one year and at the final follow-up. ConclusionSurgical treatment can provide satisfactory clinical and imaging results for thoracolumbar infection in patients over 65 years old. Although the incidence of peri-operative complications in the elderly is high, it is controllable and surgical treatment remains a safe and effective measure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1S) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. A. Karlov ◽  
P. N. Vlasov ◽  
I. A. Zhidkova

Objective: to comparatively evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with levetiracetam (LEV), a brand-name drug (bLEV; Keppra, UCB Pharma, Belgium) and its generic (gLEV;  Epiterra, TEVA, Israel) in adolescent (over 16 years of age) and adult patients with focal epilepsy (FE) during a one-year follow-up period.Patients and methods. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) bLEV (n = 143) and 2) gLEV (n = 63). Group 2 received monotherapy with gLEV at baseline, or was switched to it from  another drug within the international nonproprietary name, or to LEV from monotherapy with another antiepileptic drug (AED) due to  inefficiency and/or poor tolerability. The median doses of bLEV and  gLEV were 1000 and 1500 mg/day, respectively.Results and discussion. The results of the clinical trial suggest that LEV shows high efficacy and excellent tolerance in FE therapy. The clinical efficacy of bLEV and gLEV at 12-month follow-up was  high and amounted to 82.5% for the two dosage forms. The  frequency of adverse events was 17.5% for both bLEV and gLEV. The median dose of LEV was 1000 mg/day for Group 1 and 1500 mg/day for Group 2. Higher LEV doses in Group 2 patients were probably  due to their longer disease duration. All patients taking LEV had an  excellent or good quality of life and, when switched from other AEDs,  showed even an improvement. The comparability of clinical  results suggests that there may be bLEV to gLEV and gLEV to bLEV  switches, especially during forced drug supply disruptions; however,  this substitution should be done only after mandatorily discussing  this matter with the patient and telling him about all possible  consequences of this substitution. 


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanlong Zhong ◽  
Benyu Tang ◽  
Qi Lai ◽  
Yonghong Sheng ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundFew reports have been conducted to comparing surgical results and safety evaluations between the different types of infections in geriatric patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment for thoracolumbar infections in elderly patients.Methods21 patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) and 26 patients with tuberculous spondylodiscitis (TS) were enrolled in the study. All patients were treated using one-stage posterior debridement, decompression, and pedicle screw fixation. Comparison of operative safety parameters between the two groups. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) score, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, the short form (SF)-36 survey and Oswestry disability index (ODI) to determine patient quality of life pre- and post-operatively. Results Hospitalisation and intensive care unit duration in the PS group were significantly shorter than in the TS group (P<0.05). The total incidence of post-operative complications for both groups was 44.7%. More complications occurred in the TS group, but the difference was not significant. The VAS and SF-36 scores (physical component) were significantly better in the PS group six months post-operatively, and the SF-36 (mental component) scores were significantly better in the PS group at the one-year follow-up. Neurological status in both groups improved post-operatively, and 83% of the patients were satisfied with the results of their operation. Imaging results showed that bone graft fusion improved in both groups at six months, one year and at the final follow-up. ConclusionSurgical treatment can provide satisfactory clinical and imaging results for thoracolumbar infection in patients over 65 years old. Although the incidence of peri-operative complications in the elderly is high, it is controllable and surgical treatment remains a safe and effective measure.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 614-614
Author(s):  
Thorsten Bach ◽  
Thomas R.W. Herrmann ◽  
Roman Ganzer ◽  
Andreas J. Gross

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 110-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Moore ◽  
John Miklos ◽  
L. Dean Knoll ◽  
Mary Dupont ◽  
Mickey Karram ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 332-333
Author(s):  
Jacques Hubert ◽  
Maṅo Chammas ◽  
Benoit Feillu ◽  
Eric Mourey ◽  
Usha Seshadri-Kreaden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document