The Effects of Ethnicity on Medical Mistrust and Perceived Barriers

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yavette L. Vaden ◽  
Ian Villalta ◽  
Lori Unruh ◽  
Heather Frederick ◽  
Terry Cronan
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-54
Author(s):  
Kristen Underhill

Nondiscrimination rules—statutes, regulations, and soft law protections—are critical for reducing health and health care disparities. Although scholarship has interrogated how nondiscrimination rules affect behavior by discriminators, comparatively little has considered how protections can affect choices made by members of protected groups. A number of states and some interpretations of federal law protect people from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. This Article seeks to identify relationships between actual state law, perceived state law, and experiences of discrimination and medical mistrust. This Article reports the results of a national cross-sectional survey of over 3,000 men using Grindr to meet male partners. Participants scored comparable to chance in knowledge about state nondiscrimination protections, with “optimistic errors” (erroneous beliefs that one was protected) significantly more common than pessimistic errors. Perceptions of protection were significantly correlated with lower medical mistrust and greater uptake of care, as well as lower perceived barriers to disclosure and care-seeking. Actual state law protections, however, were significant predictors of having had discussions with providers that depended on disclosure of sexual behavior or orientation. Building on these results, this Article considers pathways by which nondiscrimination law may exert welcome mat (and “unwelcome mat”) effects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10592-10592
Author(s):  
Michael J. Hall ◽  
Sarah Bauerle Bass ◽  
Yana Chertock ◽  
Jesse A Brajuha ◽  
Paul D'Avanzo

10592 Background: TGP identifies targets for precision cancer treatments. TGP may also identify secondary hereditary cancer risks, necessitating complex decision support during informed consent. ONCs are poorly trained in the communication of genetic information, particularly for patients with low health literacy, poor knowledge of genetics, and high medical mistrust. AA patients are especially vulnerable in this setting. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 ONCs to assess perceived barriers related to communication of secondary hereditary risks of TGP, probing barriers unique to AA patients. Informed by results, an Internet-based survey was developed/distributed to a convenience sample of 50 ONCs nationwide to assess TGP knowledge, genomics confidence, and perceptions related to communication of secondary hereditary risk. Results: Six themes emerged from interviews: risk/benefits of TGP, knowledge of genetics, discussing hereditary risk, value/harm of TGP, unique risks in AA, and training needs. Most ONCs felt uncomfortable discussing hereditary risks of TGP w/patients. Seven out of 10 identified socio-economic status, medical mistrust, discrimination, genetic counseling non-compliance, low health literacy and family relationships as factors important to consider with AA patients. Online survey participants were 52% White, 66% male, with median age of 42 years. Education in the interpretation/communication of TGP was largely informal (56% reported only informal training) and 46% reported perceived gaps in their education. Genomic confidence was associated w/higher use of TGP (p = 0.05), but was not associated w/knowledge or years in practice; however, low knowledge was associated w/more perceived barriers to TGP and w/negative attitudes toward the value of TGP and the challenge of communication of possible hereditary risks (p = 0.05). Early-career ONCs were more likely to endorse perceived barriers to communication of genetic risk information from TGP to AA patients. Overall 86% ONCs felt additional online training in communication of secondary hereditary risks of TGP would be useful. Conclusions: ONCs recognize unique needs and barriers for AAs related to communication of secondary hereditary genetic information from TGP. Many feel uncertain about how/whether to address barriers and recognize the need to improve their skillset to do so. Training is critical to ensure informed decision making in vulnerable populations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya Rose Curtis

As the field of telepractice grows, perceived barriers to service delivery must be anticipated and addressed in order to provide appropriate service delivery to individuals who will benefit from this model. When applying telepractice to the field of AAC, additional barriers are encountered when clients with complex communication needs are unable to speak, often present with severe quadriplegia and are unable to position themselves or access the computer independently, and/or may have cognitive impairments and limited computer experience. Some access methods, such as eye gaze, can also present technological challenges in the telepractice environment. These barriers can be overcome, and telepractice is not only practical and effective, but often a preferred means of service delivery for persons with complex communication needs.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Matthew Webster ◽  
Michele Staton ◽  
Allison Mateyoke-Scrivner ◽  
Matthew L. Hiller ◽  
Carl Leukefeld

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Krantz ◽  
Elizabeth Cedillos ◽  
Ben Dickstein ◽  
Alan Peterson ◽  
Brett Litz

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo G. Cuevas ◽  
Kerth O'Brien ◽  
Somnath Saha

2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda L. Lindeke ◽  
Theresa R. Bly ◽  
Rachel A. Wilcox

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document