Investigating the association between death denial and cultural worldview defense

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Martens ◽  
Eva Jonas ◽  
Mark Zanna ◽  
Jeff Greenberg
2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candice Hubley ◽  
Joseph Hayes ◽  
Mary Harvey ◽  
Santina Musto

Introduction: Research in support of terror management theory suggests that mortality concerns will activate symbolic defenses associated with cultural worldviews, and when these defenses are activated, mental health will benefit. However, no study to date has examined this process in full. We filled this gap, while testing the moderating effect of feeling successful vis-à-vis cultural value-standards. Method: In two studies, we hypothesized that participants who feel successful at meeting cultural standards would engage cultural worldview defense (WVD) following mortality salience (MS), and as a consequence of their defensiveness, would experience greater mental health. Results: In Study 1, MS increased pro-American WVD only among relatively wealthy participants, which in turn reduced death-thought accessibility. In Study 2, MS increased pro-American WVD only among participants primed with felt success (vs. failure), which in turn reduced anxiety and depression. Conclusions: Culture can relieve death-related distress and promote mental health to the extent that it provides feelings of success.


Psychology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 07 (07) ◽  
pp. 1004-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongfei Du ◽  
Immo Fritsche ◽  
Zenobia Talati ◽  
Emanuele Castano ◽  
Eva Jonas

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastiaan T. Rutjens ◽  
Annemarie Loseman

Justifying social systems and defending cultural worldviews may seem to resemble the same human need to protect what is known and predictable. The current paper would like to argue that these society-supporting tendencies concern two different forms of self-regulation: the need for control and the need for meaning. Results show higher levels of system justification when participants were lacking control than when they had to think about death or about a control topic. Simultaneously, participants showed stronger worldview defense reactions when they thought about their own death, compared to those experiencing low control. This suggests that system justification may be used to compensate a loss of personal control, while cultural worldviews protect the person from existential anxiety.


Author(s):  
Zhansheng Chen ◽  
Tobias P. Kern ◽  
Kipling D. Williams
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Boucher ◽  
Thomas Bloch ◽  
Addie Pelletier

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armand Chatard ◽  
Margaux Renoux ◽  
Jean Monéger ◽  
Leila Selimbegovic

Research indicates that individuals often deal with mortality salience by affirming beliefs in national or cultural superiority (worldview defense). Because worldview defense may be associated with negative consequences (discrimination), it is important to identify alternative means to deal with death-related thoughts. In line with an embodied terror management perspective, we evaluate for the first time the role of physical warmth in reducing defensive reaction to mortality salience. We predicted that, like social affiliation (social warmth), physical warmth could reduce worldview defense when mortality is salient. In this exploratory (preregistered) study, 202 French participants were primed with death-related thoughts, or an aversive control topic, in a heated room or a non-heated room. The main outcome was worldview defense (ethnocentric bias). We found no main effect of mortality salience on worldview defense. However, physical warmth reduced worldview defense when mortality was salient. Implications for an embodied terror management perspective are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document