Toward a metatheory of theory construction

1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Lachenmeyer
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hoffmann

AbstractCreativity is an important evolutionary adaptation that allows humans to think original thoughts, to find solutions to problems that have never been encountered before and to fundamentally change the way we live. One particular domain of human cognition that has received considerable attention is linguistic creativity. The present paper discusses how the leading cognitive linguistic theory, Construction Grammar, can provide an explanatory account of creativity that goes beyond the issue of linguistic productivity. At the same time, it also outlines how Construction Grammar can benefit from insights from Conceptual Blending.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-347
Author(s):  

Graduate students, scientists and other researchers may find theory construction a rather complicated business. But first and second-graders seem to come up with explanatory answers to account for events with astonishing ease. Some "instant theories" concocted by six and seven-year-olds to answer questions have been collected by Alice Morgan and appear in her book, If You Ask Me ...! (Troy University Press; Troy, Alabama, 1978). Here is a sample: What are clouds? "Soft cotton glued together." Why are there clouds? "Rain is in the middle." How does it get out? "Thunder breaks the glue." We may wonder how long it will take this budding, young theorist to discover that giving answers is only part of the work? That an equally demanding or even greater task may involve arriving at the questions. But let's not ask the fourth grade, San Francisco student who paused at his school's display of a sample barnyard—with a live cow, two calves, a pig, lamb and chickens—and asked, "How do pigs lay bacon?"


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Audring

In recent years, construction-based approaches to morphology have gained ground in the research community. This framework is characterized by the assumption that the mental lexicon is extensive and richly structured, containing not only a large number of stored words but also a wide variety of generalizations in the form of schemas. This review explores two construction-based theories, Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology. After outlining the basic theoretical architecture, the article presents an array of recent applications of a construction-based approach to morphological phenomena in various languages. In addition, it offers reflections on challenges and opportunities for further research. The review highlights those aspects of the theory that have proved particularly helpful in accommodating both the regularities and the quirks that are typical of the grammar of words. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Linguistics, Volume 8 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 641-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremiah James ◽  
Christian Joas

As part of an attempt to establish a new understanding of the earliest applications of quantum mechanics and their importance to the overall development of quantum theory, this paper reexamines the role of research on molecular structure in the transition from the so-called old quantum theory to quantum mechanics and in the two years immediately following this shift (1926–1928). We argue on two bases against the common tendency to marginalize the contribution of these researches. First, because these applications addressed issues of longstanding interest to physicists, which they hoped, if not expected, a complete quantum theory to address, and for which they had already developed methods under the old quantum theory that would remain valid under the new mechanics. Second, because generating these applications was one of, if not the, principal means by which physicists clarified the unity, generality, and physical meaning of quantum mechanics, thereby reworking the theory into its now commonly recognized form, as well as developing an understanding of the kinds of predictions it generated and the ways in which these differed from those of the earlier classical mechanics. More broadly, we hope with this article to provide a new viewpoint on the importance of problem solving to scientific research and theory construction, one that might complement recent work on its role in science pedagogy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document