Impact of an enhanced counseling intervention among high-risk women undergoing breast/ovarian genetic testing

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Roussi ◽  
S. Miller ◽  
M. Daly ◽  
K. Sherman ◽  
M. Rodoletz
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leann A Lovejoy ◽  
Clesson E Turner ◽  
Craig D Shriver ◽  
Rachel E Ellsworth

Abstract Background The majority of active duty service women (ADS) are young, have access to healthcare, and meet fitness standards set by the U.S. military, suggesting that ADS represent a healthy population at low risk of cancer. Breast cancer is, however, the most common cancer in ADS and may have a significant effect on troop readiness with lengthy absence during treatment and inability to return to duty after the treatment. The identification of unaffected ADS who carry germline mutations in cancer predisposition genes (“previvors”) would provide the opportunity to prevent or detect cancer at an early stage, thus minimizing effects on troop readiness. In this study, we determined (1) how many high-risk ADS without cancer pursued genetic testing, (2) how many previvors employed risk-reducing strategies, and (3) the number of undiagnosed previvors within an ADS population. Methods The Clinical Breast Care Project (protocol WRNMMC IRB #20704) database of the Murtha Cancer Center/Walter Reed National Military Medical Center was queried to identify all ADS with no current or previous history of cancer. Classification as high genetic risk was calculated using National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2019 guidelines for genetic testing for breast, ovary, colon, and gastric cancer. The history of clinical genetic testing and risk-reducing strategies was extracted from the database. Genomic DNA from ADS with blood specimens available for research purposes were subjected to next-generation sequencing technologies using a cancer predisposition gene panel. Results Of the 336 cancer-free ADS enrolled in the Clinical Breast Care Project, 77 had a family history that met National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for genetic testing for BRCA1/2 and 2 had a family history of colon cancer meeting the criteria for genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. Of the 28 (35%) high-risk women who underwent clinical genetic testing, 11 had pathogenic mutations in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 (n = 5), BRCA2 (n = 5), or CHEK2 (n = 1). Five of the six ADS who had a relative with a known pathogenic mutation were carriers of the tested mutation. All of the women who had pathogenic mutations detected through clinical genetic testing underwent prophylactic double mastectomy, and three also had risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Two (6%) of the 33 high-risk ADS tested only in the research setting had a family history of breast/ovarian cancer and carried pathogenic mutations: one carried a BRCA2 mutation, whereas the other carried a mutation in the colon cancer predisposition gene PMS2. No mutations were detected in the 177 low-risk women tested in the research setting. Discussion Within this unaffected cohort of ADS, 23% were classified as high risk. Although all of the previvors engaged in risk-reduction strategies, only one-third of the high-risk women sought genetic testing. These data suggest that detailed family histories of cancer should be collected in ADS and genetic testing should be encouraged in those at high risk. The identification of previvors and concomitant use of risk-reduction strategies may improve health in the ADS and optimize military readiness by decreasing cancer incidence.


2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cappelli ◽  
L. Surh ◽  
M. Walker ◽  
Y. Korneluk ◽  
L. Humphreys ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 607-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giselle K. Perez ◽  
Dean G. Cruess ◽  
Stacy Cruess ◽  
Molly Brewer ◽  
Jennifer Stroop ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 294 (15) ◽  
pp. 1925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Nanda ◽  
L. Philip Schumm ◽  
Shelly Cummings ◽  
James D. Fackenthal ◽  
Lise Sveen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1515-1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Talea Desjardin ◽  
Mallika Sachdev Dhawan ◽  
Amie Blanco ◽  
Pamela N. Munster

1515 Background: Adherence to cancer screening depends on the interplay between risk perception and convenience. For instance, high perceived risk is likely what motivates high-risk mutation carriers (HRMC) to adhere well to rather inconvenient BCSR. While the NCCN offers BCSR for moderate-risk genes, adherence in moderate-risk mutation carriers (MRMC) and non-carriers with negative multigene panels (NC) is unknown. Methods: Screening behavior was examined in 120 women (15 HRMC, 20 MRMC, 85 NC) 20-65 years old (y) without cancer who received genetic testing and counseling. The groups did not differ in age or family history (fhx). Medical records were reviewed pre- and post-testing to determine adherence. Average follow up was 15 months. Data were analyzed by Chi-squared test. Results: Prior to genetic testing, 93% of women were adherent to general population BCSR, and 58% were already screening in accordance with post-test counseled BCSR. Testing altered adherence to counseled BCSR for HRMC (p<0.01), but not for MRMC (p=0.21) or NC (p=0.86). HRMC had better post-test adherence than MRMC (p<0.05). Conclusions: MRMC are often told to follow similar BCSR to HRMC, namely annual mammogram and MRI, but MRMC may be less motivated to adhere to these BCSR due to lower risk perception. We found adherence was high in HRMC, likely due to high risk perception; intermediate in NC, likely due to manageable BCSR; and comparably low in MRMC, possibly because their risk perception was insufficient to motivate biannual imaging studies. Understanding how genetic testing influences adherence is essential to ensuring proper surveillance in high-risk women. [Table: see text]


2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cappelli ◽  
L. Surh ◽  
M. Walker ◽  
Y. Korneluk ◽  
L. Humphreys ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1527-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Metcalfe ◽  
Mohammad R Akbari ◽  
Steven Narod ◽  
Jordan Lerner-Ellis

1527 Background: In Canada, genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is available free of charge to women who meet eligibility criteria, based on personal and family history of cancer. Less than 10% of women are identified with a BRCA mutation, despite features of hereditary cancer. PALB2 has been identified as a moderate penetrance gene in various populations. In the current study, we examined the frequency of PALB2 mutations in women with breast or ovarian cancer who met criteria for genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2and tested negative. Methods: DNA samples from women with breast or ovarian cancer, who met criteria for provincial BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing and tested negative between the years of 2007 and 2014 were included in this study. All 13 coding exons of PALB2 plus 20 base pairs from the exon boundaries were amplified using Wafergen SmartChip technology. The amplified DNA were paired-end sequenced at 2x250 cycles using an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. Results: 2,225 women with breast cancer and 429 women with ovarian cancer were tested for PALB2 mutations. No PALB2 mutations were found in women with ovarian cancer. Seventeen deleterious PALB2 mutations were detected in women with breast cancer (0.8%). The frequency of PALB2 mutations was significantly higher in women with bilateral breast cancer (2.4%) compared to women with unilateral breast cancer (0.6%) (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in age at diagnosis between those with and without a PALB2mutation (50.9 years vs 53.8 years; p = 0.34). Conclusions: Genetic testing for PALB2 should be considered for high-risk women with breast cancer, especially those who present with bilateral breast cancer. However, PALB2 does not appear to contribute to ovarian cancer which has implications for counselling women who are identified with a PALB2 mutation.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth K. Rummel ◽  
Leann A. Lovejoy ◽  
Clesson E. Turner ◽  
Craig D. Shriver ◽  
Rachel E. Ellsworth

Currently, genetic testing is offered only to women diagnosed with breast cancer who meet a defined set of criteria and is not included as standard-of-care treatment at the time of diagnosis. Thus, a significant number of women diagnosed with breast cancer may miss the opportunity for precision medical treatment and risk management. The effects of eligibility, timing, and uptake of genetic testing were evaluated in a cohort of women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2001–2018. Risk status was estimated using NCCN BRCA1/2 testing criteria and panel testing was performed for all women who had genomic DNA available. Of the 1231 women, 57.8% were eligible for genetic testing. Uptake of testing within high-risk women was 42.7% of which 6.6% pursued clinical testing only after a second tumor event. Mutation frequencies were 15.8%, 5.5%, and 4.0% in high-risk women with clinical testing, high-risk women without clinical testing, and low-risk women, respectively. More than 4% of all patients harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations detected only in the research setting. Inclusion of panel testing at the time of diagnosis would allow for appropriate surveillance and treatment strategies to be employed to reduce the risk of secondary tumors and improve patient outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document