Human factors evaluation of automatic external defribillators in a hospital setting

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munira Jessa ◽  
Joseph Cafazzo ◽  
Anjum Chagpar ◽  
Richard Cooper ◽  
Randy Wax ◽  
...  
Ergonomics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 1443-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Mitchell ◽  
A.M. Williamson ◽  
B. Molesworth ◽  
A.Z.Q. Chung

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Reid ◽  
Russell Jones ◽  
Moira Sim

IntroductionThere is a broad evidence base supporting advanced life support (ALS) education to health care professionals to be structured, realistic and inclusive of a range of human factors. However, published literature largely focusses on ALS education within institutional settings such as hospitals and associated health care facilities, with typically predictable human and material resources. The aim of this paper is to explore the literature on ALS education and report the results of an international survey undertaken to identify those educational elements which differ in the pre-hospital setting compared to the institutional setting. High quality education in pre-hospital resuscitation is important because it is critical that pre-hospital professionals provide high quality ALS to maximise the likelihood of patient survival.MethodsMEDLINE was searched using MESH terms ‘resuscitation’, ‘advanced life support’ and ‘prehospital’ as core terms. Fifteen articles relating specifically to pre-hospital resuscitation and a further 91 articles on resuscitation education were reviewed. Articles ranged in publication year from 1987 to 2016.An online survey on ALS education was developed and administered and attracted 177 responses from a range of health care professionals nationally and internationally. A total of 83 respondents completed the full survey.ResultsThe literature identifies that best practice ALS education should (a) be taught in the environment in which ALS will be performed, (b) involve team members who are similar to those they will encounter while providing ALS, and (c) use equipment the provider uses in their workplace. Human factors, in particular leadership and communication, are important components of ALS education. However, results of the survey demonstrate that best practice is not well incorporated into pre-hospital ALS education.ConclusionTo improve pre-hospital patient outcomes and maximise the chances of patient survival, ALS education to pre-hospital providers should incorporate the context of their workplace (that is, the environment in which they function), the team members they regularly work with and the equipment they use in the pre-hospital setting. Human factors, in particular leadership, should be considered as part of pre-hospital resuscitation education.


Author(s):  
Munira Jessa ◽  
Joseph Cafazzo ◽  
Anjum Chagpar ◽  
Richard Cooper ◽  
Randy Wax ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-265
Author(s):  
Kristen L. W. Webster ◽  
Reetta Stikes ◽  
Lisa Bunnell ◽  
Amanda Gardner ◽  
Sara Petruska

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1944-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schwarz ◽  
Elizabeth C. Ward ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
Anne Coccetti ◽  
Pamela D'Netto ◽  
...  

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the agreement between allied health assistants (AHAs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when completing dysphagia screening for low-risk referrals and at-risk patients under a delegation model and (b) the operational impact of this delegation model. Method All AHAs worked in the adult acute inpatient settings across three hospitals and completed training and competency evaluation prior to conducting independent screening. Screening (pass/fail) was based on results from pre-screening exclusionary questions in combination with a water swallow test and the Eating Assessment Tool. To examine the agreement of AHAs' decision making with SLPs, AHAs ( n = 7) and SLPs ( n = 8) conducted an independent, simultaneous dysphagia screening on 51 adult inpatients classified as low-risk/at-risk referrals. To examine operational impact, AHAs independently completed screening on 48 low-risk/at-risk patients, with subsequent clinical swallow evaluation conducted by an SLP with patients who failed screening. Results Exact agreement between AHAs and SLPs on overall pass/fail screening criteria for the first 51 patients was 100%. Exact agreement for the two tools was 100% for the Eating Assessment Tool and 96% for the water swallow test. In the operational impact phase ( n = 48), 58% of patients failed AHA screening, with only 10% false positives on subjective SLP assessment and nil identified false negatives. Conclusion AHAs demonstrated the ability to reliably conduct dysphagia screening on a cohort of low-risk patients, with a low rate of false negatives. Data support high level of agreement and positive operational impact of using trained AHAs to perform dysphagia screening in low-risk patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Poskus

Abstract The bedside swallow screen has become an essential part of the evaluation of a patient after stroke in the hospital setting. Implementing this type of tool should be simple. However, reinforcement and monitoring of the tool presents a challenge. Verifying the consistency and reliability of nurses performing the bedside swallow screen can be a difficult task. This article will document the journey of implementing and maintaining a reliable and valid nursing bedside swallow screen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document