Viewing Time and Sexual Interest and Arousal in Bisexual Men

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Rullo ◽  
Donals S. Strassberg
2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander F. Schmidt ◽  
Kelly M. Babchishin ◽  
Robert J. B. Lehmann

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e0127156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Fromberger ◽  
Sabrina Meyer ◽  
Christina Kempf ◽  
Kirsten Jordan ◽  
Jürgen L. Müller

Sexual Abuse ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 107906322090435
Author(s):  
Robin Welsch ◽  
Alexander F. Schmidt ◽  
Daniel Turner ◽  
Martin Rettenberger

The Explicit and Implicit Sexual Interest Profile (EISIP) is a multimethod measure of sexual interest in children and adults. It combines indirect latency-based measures such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT), Viewing Time (VT), and explicit self-report measures. This study examined test–retest reliability and absolute temporal agreement of the EISIP over a 2-week interval in persons who were convicted of sexual offenses against children ( n = 33) and nonoffending controls ( n = 48). Test–retest reliability of the aggregated EISIP measures was high across the whole sample ( rtt = .90, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = .90) with the IAT yielding the lowest retest correlations ( rtt = .66, ICC = .66). However, these indicators of relative reliability only quantify the temporal stability of individual differences within the group, not the detectability of individual change. Absolute temporal agreement as assessed via Bland–Altman plots ranged from one fourth to three thirds of a standardized unit in the sexual preference scores. This implies that individual change has to exceed medium to large standardized effect sizes to be distinguishable from spontaneous temporal variation in the EISIP measures. Overall, scores of combined measures were largely superior to single measures in terms of both absolute and relative reliability.


Sexual Abuse ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 479-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashling B. Bourke ◽  
Michael J. Gormley

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Ebsworth ◽  
Martin L. Lalumière
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1449-1457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan E. Rullo ◽  
Donald S. Strassberg ◽  
Michael H. Miner

Author(s):  
Janice Attard-Johnson ◽  
Martin R. Vasilev ◽  
Caoilte Ó Ciardha ◽  
Markus Bindemann ◽  
Kelly M. Babchishin

AbstractObjective measures of sexual interest are important for research on human sexuality. There has been a resurgence in research examining pupil dilation as a potential index of sexual orientation. We carried out a meta-analytic review of studies published between 1965 and 2020 (Mdn year = 2016) measuring pupil responses to visual stimuli of adult men and women to assess sexual interest. Separate meta-analyses were performed for six sexual orientation categories. In the final analysis, 15 studies were included for heterosexual men (N = 550), 5 studies for gay men (N = 65), 4 studies for bisexual men (N = 124), 13 studies for heterosexual women (N = 403), and 3 studies for lesbian women (N = 132). Only heterosexual and gay men demonstrated discrimination in pupillary responses that was clearly in line with their sexual orientation, with greater pupil dilation to female and male stimuli, respectively. Bisexual men showed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Although heterosexual women exhibited larger pupils to male stimuli compared to female stimuli, the magnitude of the effect was small and non-significant. Finally, lesbian women displayed greater pupil dilation to male stimuli. Three methodological moderators were identified—the sexual explicitness of stimulus materials, the measurement technique of pupillary response, and inclusion of self-report measures of sexual interest. These meta-analyses are based on a limited number of studies and are therefore preliminary. However, the results suggest that pupillary measurement of sexual interest is promising for men and that standardization is essential to gain a better understanding of the validity of this measurement technique for sexual interest.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Jahnke ◽  
Alexander F. Schmidt ◽  
Andrea Klöckner ◽  
Jürgen Hoyer

The neurodevelopmental theory of pedohebephilia states that sexual interests in children arise from early neurodevelopmental perturbations, as, for example, evidenced by increased non-right-handedness, more childhood head injuries, and reduced intelligence and height. As corroborating evidence largely rests on samples of convicted men, we conducted online surveys among German-speaking (Study 1, N = 199) and English-speaking men (Study 2, N = 632), specifically targeting community members with pedohebephilic or teleiophilic interests. Although we detected theoretically meaningful sexual interest patterns in an embedded viewing time task, we could not detect expected neurodevelopmental differences between teleiophilic and pedohebephilic men in any of the two studies. Strikingly, pedohebephilic men who reported convictions for sexual offences emerged as smaller and less intelligent than pedohebephilic men without convictions in Study 2. While elucidating possible third variable confounds, results have to be interpreted cautiously because of the methodological problems inherent to non-matched case control designs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document