Impact of Selected Background Variables on Students' NAEP Math Performance

Author(s):  
Jamal Abedi ◽  
Carol Lord ◽  
Carolyn Hofstetter
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie A. Osland ◽  
Alice P. Carter ◽  
Mary M. Livingston

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nachshon Korem ◽  
Orly Rubinsten

Current evidence suggests that math anxiety and working memory govern math performance. However, these conclusions are largely based on simple correlations, without considering these variables as a network or examining correlations at the latent variables level. Thus, questions remain regarding the role of the unique and shared variance between math anxiety, working memory and math performance. The purpose of the current study was to (i) uncover the underlying relationships between the variables to understand the unique contribution of each element to the network; (ii) measure the shared variance and identify the interactions between affect and cognition that control math performance. Our analytical approach involved both network analysis approach and structural equation modeling, with a sample of 116 female students.Results show that math anxiety and working memory affect math performance by different mechanisms. Only working memory tests that included numeric information were correlated to math anxiety. Each of the various working memory tasks correlated differently to math performance: working memory as a single latent variable was a better predictor of math performance than visuospatial and verbal working memory as two separate latent variables. Overall, both working memory and math anxiety affect math performance. Working memory tasks that include numeric information can affect performance in math anxious individuals.


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florencia Reali ◽  
William Jiménez-Leal ◽  
Carolina Maldonado-Carreño ◽  
Amy Devine ◽  
Dénes Szücs

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 934-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Abrams ◽  
Richard J. Crisp ◽  
Sibila Marques ◽  
Emily Fagg ◽  
Lauren Bedford ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 327-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatimah Ahmad ◽  
Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer

This paper argues for a more complex literature around gender and math performance. In order to argue for this complexity, we present a small portion of data from a case study examining the performance of Kuwaiti students on the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study and on Kuwait national math tests. Westernized discourses suggest that girls have a harder time in math classes; these discourses frame and are reified by prominent literature and practices within the field of math education research that suggest that women and girls need help in order to reach their potential in math. These Westernized discourses stand in contrast to the discourses in Kuwait that normalize women and girls as outperforming boys in all subjects – including all science, technology, engineering and mathematics subjects. As our study shows, the reality is more complex. And, while the reality is more complex, we yet lack the discourses to understand this complexity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document