Cross-validation of the demoralization construct in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory.

This study investigated the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory against the Revised NEO Personality Inventory to test the hypothesis that narcissistic and nonnarcissistic people have different personality profiles The two inventories were administered to 96 male and 92 female undergraduates Multivariate as well as univariate analyses of variance indicated that the Revised NEO Personality Inventory profiles were significantly different for narcissistic and nonnarcissistic groups which supported the construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory.

Download Full-text

Frame-of-Reference Effects on Police Officer Applicant Responses to the Revised NEO Personality Inventory

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology ◽

10.1007/s11896-019-9313-5 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 35 (3) ◽

pp. 328-335

Author(s):

Paul Detrick ◽

John T. Chibnall

Keyword(s):

Police Officer ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Frame Of Reference ◽

Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Revised Neo Personality Inventory

Download Full-text

Response Style and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Validity Scales and Spousal Ratings in a Chinese Psychiatric Sample

Assessment ◽

10.1177/107319110000700407 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 7 (4) ◽

pp. 389-402 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Jian Yang ◽

R. Michael Bagby ◽

Andrew G. Ryder

Keyword(s):

Personality Inventory ◽

Response Style ◽

Validity Scales ◽

Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Revised Neo Personality Inventory

Download Full-text

Revised NEO Personality Inventory Profiles of Male and Female U.S. Air Force Pilots

Military Medicine ◽

10.1093/milmed/164.12.885 ◽

1999 ◽

Vol 164 (12) ◽

pp. 885-890 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Joseph D. Callister ◽

Raymond E. King ◽

Paul D. Retzlaff ◽

Royden W. Marsh

Keyword(s):

Air Force ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Male And Female ◽

Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Revised Neo Personality Inventory

Download Full-text

Positive Impression Management and Its Influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A Comparison of Analog and Differential Prevalence Group Designs.

Psychological Assessment ◽

10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.333 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 15 (3) ◽

pp. 333-339 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

R. Michael Bagby ◽

Margarita B. Marshall

Keyword(s):

Impression Management ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Positive Impression Management ◽

Positive Impression

Download Full-text

On the Incremental Validity of MMPI–2 Psychopathology–5 Scales over the Revised Neo Personality Inventory Scales for Predicting Personality Disorders

Psychological Reports ◽

10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3c.1084 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 90 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 1084-1090 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Anupama Byravan ◽

Nerella V. Ramanaiah

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Personality Disorders ◽

Multiple Regression Analysis ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Incremental Validity ◽

Second Step ◽

Hierarchical Multiple Regression ◽

Adjective Checklist ◽

Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Revised Neo Personality Inventory

The hypothesis that the MMPI–2 Psychopathology–5 scales are better predictors of personality disorders than the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales was tested using Personality Adjective Checklist personality disorder scales with a 9-point response format. The three inventories were completed by 258 introductory psychology students (113 men and 145 women) for partial course credit. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed for predicting each Personality Adjective Checklist scale by entering the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales as a set in the first step and the Psychopathology–5 scales as a set in the second step. Incremental validity of the Psychopathology–5 scales over the Revised NEO Personality Inventory scales for predicting each Personality Adjective Checklist scale was measured by the R2 change at the end of the second step in the hierarchical multiple regression analysis. Incremental validity values ranged from .01 to .09, with a median of .03, and were significant for only five Personality Adjective Checklist scales. Such results provided very little support for the hypothesis of relative superiority of the Psychopathology–5 scales over the Revised NEO Personality Inventory domain scales for predicting personality disorders.

Download Full-text

Argumentativeness and the Facets of the Big Five

Psychological Reports ◽

10.2466/pr0.1997.81.3f.1379 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 81 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 1379-1385 ◽

Cited By ~ 16

Author(s):

Gerhard Blickle

Keyword(s):

Big Five ◽

Personality Trait ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Openness To Experience ◽

Female Students ◽

Controversial Issues ◽

Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Multivariate Study ◽

Revised Neo Personality Inventory ◽

Domain Level

Argumentativeness is conceptualized as a personality trait which predisposes an individual to recognize controversial issues and to advocate or refute positions on them. In a multivariate study with 166 male and 120 female students, the relationships between scores on the Argumentativeness scales and the facet and domain scales of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (Form S) were analyzed. At the facet level, scores on Tendency to Approach arguments and Argumentativeness correlated significantly with scores on Assertiveness and Openness to Ideas, and scores on Tendency to Avoid arguments correlated significantly with scores on Self-consciousness and Assertiveness. At the domain level, scores on Openness to Experience correlated significantly with those on Tendency to Approach arguments and with the Argumentativeness scale and scores on Extraversion correlated significantly with Tendency to Avoid arguments and the Argumentativeness scale.

Download Full-text