Work Environment Scale

Author(s):  
Rudolf H. Moos ◽  
Paul M. Insel
1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanine M. Driscoll ◽  
Frances A. Kelley ◽  
Ruth E. Fassinger

NASPA Journal ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Salter ◽  
Reynol Junco ◽  
Summer D. Irvin

To address the ability of the Salter Environment Type Assessment (SETA) to measure different kinds of campus environments, data from three studies of the SETA with the Work Environment Scale, Group Environment Scale, and University Residence Environment Scale were reexamined (n = 534). Relationship dimension scales were very consistent with extraversion and feeling from environmental type theory. System maintenance and systems change scales were associated with judging and perception on the SETA, respectively. Results from the SETA and personal growth dimension scales were mixed. Based on this analysis, the SETA may serve as a general purpose environmental assessment for use with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvette Pryse ◽  
Anna McDaniel ◽  
John Schafer

1996 ◽  
Vol 161 (5) ◽  
pp. 284-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Patrick Maloney ◽  
Frances Dee Anderson ◽  
Dianne L. Gladd ◽  
Diane L. Brown ◽  
Mary A. Hardy

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miyuki Takase ◽  
Yoko Nakayoshi ◽  
Sachiko Teraoka

1984 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 319-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo L. Abraham ◽  
Theresa S. Foley

Alpha coefficients of internal consistency for the Short Forms of the Work Environment Scale and Ward Atmosphere Scale, their major dimensions and their subscales are presented. Although some exceptions were noted, the indices reported here attest to the adequate reliability of the short forms of the two scales, which was previously documented for the unabridged forms. The few exceptions are hypothesized to be attributable to either sampling error or the fact that each factor is comprised of only 4 items. The need for further reliability testing of these short forms is emphasized.


1983 ◽  
Vol 53 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1160-1162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward J. Lusk ◽  
P. Cormier ◽  
Ali Geranmayeh ◽  
Debbi Diserens ◽  
Joao Neves

Comparisons of data from 298 preclinical and 104 clinical dental students in 1981 and 1982 on the Work Environment Scale are significant for Staff Support, Task Orientation, Work Pressure, and Clarity. Test results have been used to understand how students perceive their work environment. Baseline data should facilitate decisions about work environments.


1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1155-1161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard F. Booth ◽  
Karen T. Lantz

The Insel and Moos' Work Environment Scale was used to assess expectations ac the time of occupational entry and perceptions in training and on the job for 200 Navy enlisted men and 200 Navy enlisted women working in health care jobs. A comparison by sex of these variables showed that the men and women entered naval work environments with different expectations of what would be encountered, but that once they had experienced the actual psychosocial climate they tended to perceive both the training and job environments in a similar manner. An exception to this general finding indicated that Navy administrators may be using different techniques for supervising the behavior of men and women. Furthermore the men and women working in ward environments tended to perceive the psychosocial climate very differently in contrast to the less substantial sex differences found in psychosocial perceptions toward other paramedical work settings. A need for further research on the influence of sex differences on supervisor-subordinate relationships is noted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document