new view
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2068
(FIVE YEARS 237)

H-INDEX

87
(FIVE YEARS 7)

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Paul Stretton
Keyword(s):  

Metaphysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 133-148
Author(s):  
I. A Rybakova

This translation contains the preface and the first two chapters from the last book of W. Heisenberg’s disciple Hans-Peter Duerr “Matter does not exist!” The book is devoted to the problem of interpretation of quantum mechanics. The author, G.-P. Duerr, raises the question of the need for a new view of the fundamental issues of physics and philosophy in general, while he turns to the experience of the Indian philosophical tradition, primarily relies on the Advaita Vedanta school. The author focuses on the concepts of “transcendence”, “immanence”, “cognition”, etc. The problematic of this work lies in the field of not only physics, metaphysics and religion, but also psychology, intercultural interaction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 105-119
Author(s):  
Karolina PalimĄka

Abstract The phenomenon of entrepreneurship has various perspectives – economic, financial, social, and psychological. The aim of this paper is to present entrepreneurship from a perspective merging both financial and non-financial aspects of this phenomenon. The article presents two (complementary) aspects related to the phenomenon of entrepreneurship. One of the aspects described by author is the availability of financing for businesses in Poland (showing the issue in response to the most important obstacle to running a business), the other is shaping entrepreneurial attitudes. The section on sources of financing give an answer to the question of whether (and if so - to what extent) the problem of access to financing is a real barrier to starting a business in Poland. Presenting the perspective of students gives a new view on the subject and enables us to recognize factors that determine the decision to start a business among young people, knowledge of which may contribute to a change in attitudes towards setting up a business in Poland. Among the conclusions, the author mentions, inter alia, the need to strengthen entrepreneurial attitudes among students, especially due to the growing number of companies operating in Poland for reasons of positive motivation (such as improvement of the standard of living or independence). Moreover, the conducted analyses lead to the conclusion that new companies are financed primarily from their own resources, which discourages many from starting their own business.


2021 ◽  
pp. 397-405
Author(s):  
Tatyana Skvortsova ◽  
Gennady Pratsko ◽  
Tatyana Epifanova

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasiya Kondrat'eva

A new view of the position of oak in the successional processes of oak forests of the forest-steppe is presented, based on the population strategy of this species and the peculiarities of the conditions for the development of pregenerative stages. The preferable conditions for natural regeneration of oak in forest communities and their relationship with the dynamics of deciduous communities of the forest-steppe are analyzed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Riedel ◽  
Zuzana Vranova ◽  
Antonin Mazalek

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Wetterich
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Magnus Jedenheim Edling
Keyword(s):  
Do So ◽  

AbstractAccording to the counterfactual comparative account (CCA), an event harms a person if and only if it makes things worse for her. Cases of overdetermination and preemption pose a serious challenge to CCA since, in these cases, although it is evident that people are harmed, there are no individual events that harm them. However, while there are no individual events that make people worse off in cases of overdetermination and preemption, there are pluralities of events that do so. In light of this feature of these cases, several philosophers have suggested that it is these pluralities that do the harming. In this article, I will argue that although the most prominent accounts of plural harm – e.g., Neil Feit’s account – fare better than one might initially think, they fail to deal adequately with a number of intriguing cases of preemption first introduced by Alastair Norcross. I will also introduce a new view on plural harm and argue that this view, apart from dealing with the cases of overdetermination and preemption that the other accounts of plural harm handle, also deals adequately with Norcross’s cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document