Undergraduates' Post-Stress Growth Questionnaire

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Mei Wu ◽  
Fang Jian-Dong
Keyword(s):  
HortScience ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1081G-1081
Author(s):  
Jing-fen Chen ◽  
Paul H. Li ◽  
David W. Davis

Exposure of young pepper plants to chilling temperatures delays the development of terminal flower buds to flowering during post-stress growth. Degree of adverse influence depends on chilling intensity, exposure duration and varietal sensitivity. `Ma Belle' pepper plants were grown in a greenhouse (GH) during winter months on the St. Paul campus, No supplemental lighting was provided. When plants were at the 2- to 3-leaf stage, they were foliar sprayed with mefluidide (Technical grade) at 0, 5, 10 and 15 ppm. One day after treatment, some plants were transferred from GH to a cold room (3° ∼4°C day/night) with 12-h photoperiod. Treatad plants remaining in the GH served as the control. Plants were chilled for 1, 2, 4 and 6 days and then brought back to the GH for post-stress growth and development observation. Treated and untreated plants grown in the GH showed no difference in days to flowering, and reached 50% flowering at about 62 days after treatment. When untreated plants were chilled for 1,2,4 and 6 days, they showed a delay of 8, 18, 30 and 34 days, respectively, to flowering, If not killed, as compared to the control The long delay to flowering was due to the injury of the terminal flower buds. After 4 and 6 days of chilling, most terminal flower buds were killed. However, when plants were treated with mefluidide and subsequently chilled days to flowering were significantly shortened. A difference of 10-12 days was observed between chilled untreated plants and chilled treated plants. Concentrations of 5 to 15 ppm were equally effective in protection against chilling.


2014 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad A. Keyser ◽  
Éverton K.K. Fernandes ◽  
Drauzio E.N. Rangel ◽  
Donald W. Roberts

HortScience ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1081g-1081
Author(s):  
Jing-fen Chen ◽  
Paul H. Li ◽  
David W. Davis

Exposure of young pepper plants to chilling temperatures delays the development of terminal flower buds to flowering during post-stress growth. Degree of adverse influence depends on chilling intensity, exposure duration and varietal sensitivity. `Ma Belle' pepper plants were grown in a greenhouse (GH) during winter months on the St. Paul campus, No supplemental lighting was provided. When plants were at the 2- to 3-leaf stage, they were foliar sprayed with mefluidide (Technical grade) at 0, 5, 10 and 15 ppm. One day after treatment, some plants were transferred from GH to a cold room (3° ∼4°C day/night) with 12-h photoperiod. Treatad plants remaining in the GH served as the control. Plants were chilled for 1, 2, 4 and 6 days and then brought back to the GH for post-stress growth and development observation. Treated and untreated plants grown in the GH showed no difference in days to flowering, and reached 50% flowering at about 62 days after treatment. When untreated plants were chilled for 1,2,4 and 6 days, they showed a delay of 8, 18, 30 and 34 days, respectively, to flowering, If not killed, as compared to the control The long delay to flowering was due to the injury of the terminal flower buds. After 4 and 6 days of chilling, most terminal flower buds were killed. However, when plants were treated with mefluidide and subsequently chilled days to flowering were significantly shortened. A difference of 10-12 days was observed between chilled untreated plants and chilled treated plants. Concentrations of 5 to 15 ppm were equally effective in protection against chilling.


2020 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 103541
Author(s):  
Jinlan Ding ◽  
Xinzhao Chen ◽  
Marcia Santos da Silva ◽  
Jolanthe Lingeman ◽  
Fang Han ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A45-A45
Author(s):  
Irma Gvilia ◽  
Sunil Kumar ◽  
Dennis McGinty ◽  
Ronald Szymusiak

Abstract Introduction We have previously shown that pharmacological elevation of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) signaling in the brain results in exacerbation of sleep disturbances evoked by the exposure of rats to an acute stressor, the dirty cage of a male rat. In the present study we (1) assessed wake-sleep behavior of mice after the exposure to the dirty cage stress paradigm, and (2) examined the effect of chemogenetic silencing of CRF neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) on sleep occurring following the exposure to this stressor. Methods First, a group of mice (n=12) was implanted with EEG/EMG electrodes. In two weeks, post-surgery, six mice were transferred to dirty cages of male rats and recorded for 24 hours. Control mice were transferred to clean cages. In the second study, a group of CRF-ires-cre mice (n=8) received bilateral injections of AAV-hSyn-DIO-hM4Di-mCherry targeting the PVN. The other group of CRF-ires-cre mice (n=8) was injected AAV-hSyn-DIO-mCherry (control vector). All mice were implanted with EEG/EMG electrodes. Dirty cage experiments were started following a 4-week postsurgical period to allow gene recombination and expression. Mice were subjected to intraperitoneal (IP) administration of clozapine-n-oxide (CNO; 3 mg/kg) at ZT1, placed into dirty cages, and recorded for post-stress sleep. Results: Results In mice expressing hM4Di inhibitory DREADDs (designer receptors activated by designer drugs) versus mice injected with control AAV, IP CNO (3 mg/kg) resulted in a significant decrease of post-stress sleep onset latency, decrease of time spent in wakefulness (first hour, 74±5.3 vs. 89±11.0, second hour, 37.2±10.3% vs. 81.3±9.3%; third hour, 40.1±3.3% vs. 47.1±14.3%; fourth hour, 44.4±6.0 vs. 55.5±9.9), and increase in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep time (26.0±5.4% vs. 11.0±11.1%; 62.8%±9.8 vs. 18.7 ± 9.6%; 59.9±3.2% vs. 52.9±14.5%; 55.6±6.2 vs. 44.5±10.0). The hM4Di expressing mice exhibited longer episodes of NREM sleep, compared to mice injected with control AAV (first hour, 133.3±80.1sec vs. 21±1.7sec; second hour, 43256±83.4sec vs. 73.5±44.1sec; third hour, 459.2±139.8sec vs. 139±80.6sec; fourth hour, 233.1±82.6sec vs. 190±72.3sec). Conclusion Chemogenetic silencing of CRF neurons in the PVN attenuates acute stress-induced sleep disturbance in mice. Support (if any) Supported by Department of Veterans Affairs Merit Review Grant # BX00155605 and SRNSF (Georgia) grant FR-18-12533


Author(s):  
Angelica Mazzoletti ◽  
Domenico Albano ◽  
Francesco Bertagna ◽  
Claudio Tinoco Mesquita ◽  
Raffaele Giubbini

Abstract Background-Aim The relationship between perfusion pattern and stress-induced changes in Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony (LVMD) has been previously described with controversial results using stress-rest perfusion imaging studies. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between perfusion pattern and stress-induced changes in LVMD usingo regadenoson/rest13N-NH3 PET/CT. Methods There were 74 patients who underwent stress-rest 13N-NH PET/CT from January 2014 to October 2018 excluding patients with left bundle branch block, ventricular pacing and myocardial necrosis. The patients were divided into those with reversible perfusion defects at stress (Ischemic group, n = 18) and patients without reversible perfusion defects (non-ischemic group, n = 56). The LVMD parameters included: phase standard deviation (PSD) and phase histogram bandwidth (PHB), after stress and at rest. The ΔPSD (post-stressPSD-restPSD) and ΔPHB (post-stressPHB—restPHB) were calculated to measure stress-induced changes in LVMD. Results There were no significant differences in LVMD parameters between post-stress and at rest in both groups. The PSD post-stress, ΔPSD and PHB post-stress were significantly higher in the ischemic group. Conclusions Using a vasodilator as a stress, the PSD and PHB post-stress and ΔPSD were significantly higher in the ischemic patients than the non-ischemic group, while there were no significant differences in each cohort between stress and rest indices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document