Peripheral blood minimal residual disease may replace bone marrow minimal residual disease as an immunophenotypic biomarker for impending relapse in acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract One of the difficulties in managing patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the detection of minimal residual disease. Only a fraction of AML patients have a distinct phenotype on flow cytometry or a genetic abnormality which can be followed as a sensitive marker for minimal residual disease (MRD). The Wilm’s tumor - 1 gene (WT1) is overexpressed in leukemic blasts, but not in normal blood or marrow cells, and thus can be used as a marker for MRD in leukemia patients who otherwise do not have a characteristic immunophenotypic or molecular marker that can be monitored. We prospectively measured serial peripheral blood WT1 levels by RQ-PCR in 54 patients with AML. Of the 54 patients, 23 patients were newly diagnosed. The remaining 31 patients were in complete remission prior to a planned allogeneic transplant. Subsequent WT1 levels were obtained during routine evaluation both during and up to three years after completion of either chemotherapy and/or transplant. Using regression analysis, we found that a normalized WT1 level greater than 10−4 (as compared to a level of 1 in K562 cells) indicates a higher likelihood of the patient having active leukemia with a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 89.1%. The positive and negative predictive values are 71.19% and 95.89% respectively. We also compared WT1 levels with peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts to determine whether a correlation existed. We found a strong correlation between WT1 expression and bone marrow blasts with a correlation coefficient of 0.77 (p< 0.0001). A weak correlation was found with peripheral blood blast count (correlation coefficient = 0.35, p<0.0001). Our data implies WT1 can be a useful marker for minimal residual disease in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, especially in patients who do not have an unusual phenotype or molecular marker to monitor MRD.

Download Full-text

Minimal residual disease diagnostics in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in the post-transplant period: comparison of peripheral blood and bone marrow analysis

Leukemia & Lymphoma ◽

10.3109/10428194.2010.508822 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 51 (10) ◽

pp. 1837-1843 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Tanja Stahl ◽

Anita Badbaran ◽

Nicolaus Kröger ◽

Evgeny Klyuchnikov ◽

Tatjana Zabelina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Disease Diagnostics ◽

Bone Marrow Analysis ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Acute Myeloid

Download Full-text

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Burden in the Bone Marrow Predicts End of Induction Minimal Residual Disease Status in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.2582.2582 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 2582-2582

Author(s):

Papagudi Ganesan Subramanian ◽

Nikhil Patkar ◽

Prashant Tembhare ◽

Yajamanam Badrinath ◽

Sitaram G Ghogale ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Statistical Analysis ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Residual Disease ◽

High Group ◽

Viable Cells ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction: Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are a subset of immune cells that secrete type 1 interferons and serve as antigen presenting cells. In many tumors increased pDC frequencies have been observed and are involved in tumor response initiation. However, there is not much data in acute myeloid leukemia especially in the context of minimal residual disease. Here we evaluated the frequencies of pDCs in the post induction bone marrow and found a significant correlation with MRD levels. Methods: All adult (>18 years ) of patients who were treated for AML [other than AML with t(15;17)] were accrued over a 2 year period. The presence of MRD was assessed using 8 colour flow cytometry on a post induction bone marrows using CD45, CD36, CD38, CD123, CD33, CD117, CD34, HLADR, CD7, CD56, CD13, CD19, CD16, CD11b, CD15 and CD14. Minimum of 500,000 events were acquired/tube on an 8 colour BD FACS Canto II or a 10 colour BC Navios instruments. Kaluza software (v1.3) was used to analyze the .fcs files. MRD was calculated as a percentage of abnormal leukemic cells per total viable cells as gated in forward scatter v side scatter plot. pDCs were calculated as CD123 bright population which expressed HLA-DR (while gating on the progenitors and monocytes based on their expression of CD45 and side scatter). The pDC percentages were counted as a fraction of all viable cells. Based on the results the levels of pDCs were divided into pDC High and pDC Low groups. Statistical analysis was done using Chi squared groups. Results: After exclusion of induction deaths, a total of 94 patients of adult AML was assessed for the presence of MRD at the end of induction. Of these MRD was detected in 48 (51.1%, range 0.01-40%). pDC values ranged from <0.01% to 1.95% (median 0.15%). Median pDC value in the MRD positive group was lower (0.05%) as compared to the MRD negative group (0.23%). Out of 94 patients of 44.7% patients belonged to the pDC Low group of which majority patients were MRD positive (66.7% of the pDC Low group). Similarly majority of patients in the pDC High group were MRD negative (61.5% of the pDC High group). A statistical analysis of these categories was also found to be significant (p=0.008) Conclusion: These pilot data seem to indicate that the pDC burden in the bone marrow may have a role in influencing MRD clearance in the bone marrow. A detailed investigation of the pDC function in the bone marrow microenvironment is warranted. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Impact of Pretransplantation Minimal Residual Disease Detection for Flow Cytometric, on Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia. a Single Center Experience in Colombia over 14 Years

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5411.5411 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5411-5411

Author(s):

Andres Armando Borda Molina ◽

Iris Cordoba ◽

Virginia Abello ◽

Carmen Rosales ◽

Rosales Manuel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Allogeneic Bone ◽

Flow Cytometric ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: The accumulated evidence from studies of multiparameter flow cytometric MRD (MFC-MRD) assessment in AML leaves little doubt that this method of MRD detection can be used to risk stratify both younger and older patients at treatment time points. Persistence of disease or high levels of pretransplantation minimal residual disease (MRD) have been reported to predict disease relapse after Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The prognostic impact of MFC-MRD is strong enough to have emerged despite study differences in the MFC assays and the limitations of now outdated restricted antibody panels. Aims: To determine the value of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessed by Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) pretransplantation Allogeneic BMT, in predicting outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis the predictive value of MRD assessment by MFC pre trasnplantation alogeneic in 119 patients (diagnosed AML treated between january 2010 and october 2014 submitted at our institution who had available MRD assessment). MRD by MFC on bone marrow specimens obtained approximately 30 days before transplantation. MRD was identified as a cell population showing deviation from normal antigen expression patters compared with normal or regenerating marrow. The detection threshold for defining pre transplantation positive MRD was >0.3%. Results - Of the 119 patients, 80 (67%) were in complete remission (CR1) , 31 (26%) CR2 and > CR2 8 (6%). Their median age was 38 years (Range, 10-64). Hyperleucocytosis in 39 (32%) and Cytogenetics was favorable risk in 32 (26%), intermediate risk in 39 (32.%), adverse risk in 35 (29%) and unknown in 13 (14%). There were a total of 44 deaths and 17 relapses; these contributed to the probability estimates for overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS), stratified by MRD status and shown in figure 1. The median follow-up after BMT among survivors was 8.3 years (range, 6.9 to 9,6 years). The 7.5-years estimates of OS for MRD-positive and MRD-negative patients were 43.1% (range, 23,2% to 58,6%) and 68% (range 56% to 78.3%), respectively, and the 7,5 year estimates for DFS for MRD-positive and MRD-negative patients were 40.5% (range 21.4% to 52.6%) and 56% (range 42.5% to 65.8%). After adjustment for various covariates, age, cytogenetics risk, hyperleucocytosis, secundary AML, the hazard ratios of MRD positive versus MRD negative were 2.06 (range 1.52 to 6.24; P=0,003) for overall mortality, 3.45 ( range 2.14 to 7.32; p=0.014) for DFS. Conclusion: That detection of MRD pre transplantation define a population of patients with AML who are at higher risk for adverse outcome, even after adjusting for other factors that influence post-BMT outcome. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Persistence of Minimal Residual Disease Assessed By Multi-Parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) at 30 and 90 Days after Achieving Complete Remission Predicts Outcome in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1015.1015 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1015-1015

Author(s):

Pramod Pinnamaneni ◽

Jeffrey L. Jorgensen ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Elias Jabbour ◽

Sherry R. Pierce ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Complete Remission ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Response To Therapy ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose – To determine the value of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessed by Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) after achieving initial response to therapy, in predicting outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Methods – We investigated the predictive value of MRD assessment by MFC in 191 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated between February 2010 and April 2014 at our institution who had available MRD assessment. MRD by MFC was assessed using an 8-color panel containing 19 distinct markers, on bone marrow specimens obtained at the time of achievement of CR and at approximately 30 days and 90 days after achieving CR. Residual leukemic blasts were identified based on phenotypic differences from normal myelomonocytic precursors. Sensitivity was estimated at 0.1% in most cases, with maximum achievable sensitivity of 0.01%, depending on the leukemic phenotype. Results – Of the 191 patients, 167 (87%) achieved complete remission (CR) or CR without platelet recovery (CRp). Their median age was 58 years (Range, 17-85). 84 (44%) were older than 60 years. Median WBC at presentation was 3.2 x 109/L(Range, 0.5-100.2 x 109/L) and median bone marrow blast percentage was 43% (Range, 11-96%). Cytogenetics was favorable risk in 4 (2%), intermediate risk in130 (68%) and adverse risk in 57 (30%). Treatment included cytarabine plus anthracycline in 170 (89%) and hypomethylating agents-based strategies in 21 (11%). 48 patients had available samples at 30 days post CR and 32 (67%) became MRD negative. Achieving MRD negative status was associated with a statistically significant improvement in CR duration (p=0.02) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.0005). 56 patients were evaluated for MRD status at 90 days and 45 (80%) were negative. Again, achieving MRD negative status was associated with a significant improvement in CR duration (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.0009). Conclusion – Achieving MRD negative status by MFC at 30 and 90 days post CR is associated with an improved outcome in patients with AML Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Quantified by Multiparameter Flow Cytomety and Quantitative RT-PCR Is an Independent Prognostic Parameter.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.319.319 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 319-319 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Wolfgang Kern ◽

Claudia Schoch ◽

Torsten Haferlach ◽

Daniela Voskova ◽

Wolfgang Hiddemann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Prognostic Impact ◽

Cox Regression Analysis ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Acute Myeloid

Quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD) is becoming increasingly important to guide therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While MFC can be applied to more patients with AML than QPCR, the latter has the advantage of a higher sensitivity in many cases. We compared data obtained by both methods in parallel in bone marrow samples in 160 patients at diagnosis and at 469 follow-up checkpoints. MFC was applied at diagnosis with a comprehensive panel of antibodies to identify leukemia-associated aberrant immunophenotypes (LAIP) useful for MRD monitoring. QPCR targeted on the leukemia-specific fusion transcripts AML1-ETO, AML1-EVI1, CBFB-MYH11, MLL-AF10, MLL-AF6, MLL-AF9, MLL-ELL, MLL-ENL, and PML-RARA as well as overexpression of EVI1, length mutations of FLT3, and partial tandem duplications of MLL. In order to adjust for differences in the percentages of bone marrow cells covered by the respective LAIP by MFC at diagnosis and for the heterogeneity of transcript levels detected by QPCR at diagnosis, the logarithmic difference (LD) was calculated for each follow-up sample in comparison to the diagnostic sample. There was a significant correlation between MFC and QPCR with regard to the LD from diagnosis to follow-up checkpoint (r=0.645, p=0.000001). Concordant results with regard to negativity between QPCR (no signal) and MFC (<0.01% positive cells) was found in 301/469 (64.2%) samples (both methods positive, 270 (57.6%); both methods negative, 31 (6.6%)). In 44 samples (9.4%) QPCR detected positivity and MFC negativity while in 124 samples (26.4%) MFC detected positivity and QPCR negativity (sensitivity of QPCR was lower than 1:100,000 in some cases). In 133 patients clinical follow-up data was available allowing the analysis of the prognostic impact of MRD levels. Cytogenetics were favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable in 86, 30, and 17 cases, respectively. Median age was 46 years (range, 17–83). Median event-free survival (EFS) was 22.1 months, overall survival (OS) at three years was 77%. The median LDs for MFC and QPCR at the checkpoint 1 (up to day 21), 2 (day 22–60), 3 (day 61–120), 4 (day 121–365), and 5 (after day 365) were 2.40 and 0.62, 2.05 and 1.55, 2.51 and 3.34, 2.71 and 3.70, and 2.60 and 3.45, respectively. Separating patients according to these median LDs resulted in a better EFS and OS for cases with higher LDs at all five checkpoints for each method. Significant differences in EFS were observed at checkpoints 2 (MFC, 22.1 vs. 12.6 months, p=0.0379; QPCR, median not reached vs. 9.9, p=0.0081), 3 (QPCR, 30.9 vs. 14.1 months, p=0.0011), 4 (MFC, median not reached vs. 16.9 months, p=0.0007; QPCR, median not reached vs. 15.1 months, p=0.0102), and 5 (QPCR, median not reached vs. 17.2, p=0.0008). Cox regression analysis taking into consideration cytogenetics, age, WBC count, and bone marrow blast count at diagnosis identified the LD at checkpoint 4 determined by MFC and the LD at checkpoints 2 and 5 determined by QPCR as independent prognostic factors. The results of our analyses confirm that both MFC and QPCR are highly sensitive methods capable of quantifying MRD in AML. While data are concordant for both methods in many cases, either of the two has advantages in distinct cases depending on the individual MRD marker. Clinical trials should consider MRD monitoring by both methods in order to prove their respective roles in risk prediction and treatment stratification.

Download Full-text

Microfluidics for the detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia patients using circulating leukemic cells selected from blood

The Analyst ◽

10.1039/c5an01836f ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 141 (2) ◽

pp. 640-651 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Joshua M. Jackson ◽

James B. Taylor ◽

Małgorzata A. Witek ◽

Sally A. Hunsucker ◽

Jennifer P. Waugh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Early Detection ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Leukemic Cells ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Selection Of ◽

Acute Myeloid

Microfluidic assay for the selection of circulating leukemic cells from peripheral blood for the early detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Download Full-text

Arsenic Trioxide Reprograms the Bone-Marrow Microenvironment to Sensitize Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153244 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1166-1166

Author(s):

Patric Teodorescu ◽

Yuya Nagai ◽

Guo Zhong ◽

Vikram Mathews ◽

Nina Isoherranen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Arsenic Trioxide ◽

Minimal Residual Disease ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Residual Disease ◽

Single Agent ◽

Bone Marrow Niche ◽

Minimal Residual ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract Eliminating minimal residual disease (MRD) in order to prevent relapse is an unmet need in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One of the success stories is acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), a unique subtype of AML. The use of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in combination with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) has essentially eliminated disease relapse (<1% ATRA+ATO vs. ~18% ATRA+ chemotherapy - NEJM (2013), 369(2), 111-121). This is even more impressive as neither agent alone results in significant cure of patients with APL. In fact, single agent ATRA induces remission without cure due to bone marrow stroma expression of CYP26 enzymes (PloS one (2015), 10(6), e0127790), which are induced by ATRA, inactivate retinoids and protect APL MRD (Leukemia (2020), 34(11), 3077-3081). While ATO may synergize with ATRA by restoring PML nuclear bodies (Nature medicine (2014), 20(2), 167-174) and rescuing RAR-α dependent transcription (Nature reviews. Cancer (2018), 18(2), 117-127) in the bulk of the APL tumor cells, it is unclear how these mechanisms contribute to elimination of MRD, particularly given the hypothesized lack of ATRA in the bone marrow niche. It was previously reported that combination of ATRA with ATO may be associated with high incidence of transaminitis and headaches (NEJM (2013), 369(2), 111-121). Since these may be clinical signs of ATRA toxicity, we investigated if addition of ATO changes the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of ATRA in patients with APL. We determined the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) for ATRA in patients suspected of APL and treated with single agent ATRA ("preATO") and in the same patients after the diagnoses of APL was confirmed and the patients received ATO ("postATO"). Even though ATRA should have an expected drop in AUC during the first 3-4 days of therapy (JPET (2017), 361(2), 246-258), addition of ATO resulted in improved ATRA PKs (Figure A). Since ATRA levels are mainly controlled by clearance via hepatic CYP26s, we tested if treatment with ATO changes the levels of CYP26 or its induction by ATRA. We found that exposure to ATO decreases both baseline and ATRA-induced upregulation of CYP26B1 in HepG2 cells (Figure B). Similarly, ATO decreases CYP26B1 levels in human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stroma cells (MSCs) at baseline (21%±7% of NO ATO control, n=3, p<0.01) and after ATRA-induced upregulation (66%±14% of ATRA only control, n=3, p<0.01). These changes resulted in improved ATRA PKs in vitro in the presence of bone marrow MSCs (Figure C). Next, we used NB4-EvAsR cells (NB4R), ATO-resistant APL cells to test if ATO-induced improvement of MSC-dependent ATRA PKs may contribute to elimination of APL MRD. We found that ATO sensitizes NB4R to ATRA in the presence of BM MSCs but not in stroma free conditions (Figure D). ATO had no effect on ATRA-induced differentiation of NB4R in the presence of CYP26B1 knockout stroma (this stroma offers no protection from ATRA) or if stroma expresses CYP26B1 under the control of a viral promoter and thus, resistant to ATO downregulation. This data suggest that ATO-induced changes of BM MSC expression of CYP26 may contribute to elimination of MRD in APL. Stromal CYP26 protects not only APL but also non-APL AML cells from retinoids (Leukemia (2020), 34(11), 3077-3081). Retinoids are synergistic with FLT3 inhibitors to eliminate mutant FLT3 AML cells (Blood (2016), 127(23), 2867-2878) and stromal CYP26 breaks this synergism (Blood (2015) 126 (23): 790). We tested if ATO sensitizes mutant FLT3 AML cells, MV4;11 to gilteritinib in the presence of BM MSCs. For this, we derived MV4.11 cells resistant to ATO (MV4.11R) via long term exposure to increasing concentration of ATO. As seen with NB4R, ATO treatment synergizes with gilteritinib to decrease the IC50 of gilteritinib against the clonogenic activity of MV4.11R in the presence of stroma but not in stroma free conditions (Figure E). In an effort to fully explore the translational potential of these findings, we are currently investigating the mechanism by which ATO changes CYP26 levels. Taken together these findings support a model in which ATO changes the bone marrow niche and it's ability to metabolize retinoids and thus, sensitizes MRD in AML to targeted therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mathews: Christian Medical College: Patents & Royalties: US 2020/0345770 A1 - Pub.Date Nov.5, 2020; AML: Other: Co-Inventor. Ghiaur: Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Menarini Richerche: Research Funding.

Download Full-text