scholarly journals Next-generation sequencing identifies major DNA methylation changes during progression of Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia

Leukemia ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (9) ◽  
pp. 1861-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Heller ◽  
T Topakian ◽  
C Altenberger ◽  
S Cerny-Reiterer ◽  
S Herndlhofer ◽  
...  
Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1145
Author(s):  
Anna Deregowska ◽  
Monika Pepek ◽  
Katarzyna Pruszczyk ◽  
Marcin M. Machnicki ◽  
Maciej Wnuk ◽  
...  

Telomeres are specialized nucleoprotein complexes, localized at the physical ends of chromosomes, that contribute to the maintenance of genome stability. One of the features of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells is a reduction in telomere length which may result in increased genomic instability and progression of the disease. Aberrant telomere maintenance in CML is not fully understood and other mechanisms such as the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) are involved. In this work, we employed five BCR-ABL1-positive cell lines, namely K562, KU-812, LAMA-84, MEG-A2, and MOLM-1, commonly used in the laboratories to study the link between mutation, copy number, and expression of telomere maintenance genes with the expression, copy number, and activity of BCR-ABL1. Our results demonstrated that the copy number and expression of BCR-ABL1 are crucial for telomere lengthening. We observed a correlation between BCR-ABL1 expression and telomere length as well as shelterins upregulation. Next-generation sequencing revealed pathogenic variants and copy number alterations in major tumor suppressors, such as TP53 and CDKN2A, but not in telomere-associated genes. Taken together, we showed that BCR-ABL1 kinase expression and activity play a crucial role in the maintenance of telomeres in CML cell lines. Our results may help to validate and properly interpret results obtained by many laboratories employing these in vitro models of CML.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1654-1654
Author(s):  
Jayachandran PK ◽  
Trivadi S Ganesan ◽  
Nikita Mehra ◽  
Krishnarathinam Kannan ◽  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
...  

Background: Imatinib resistance mutation analysis (IRMA) or abl kinase domain mutation analysis is performed in patients with Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) whenever the response to treatment is inadequate. We have analyzed the reports of IRMA at our centre. Methods: The clinical details of 71 patients with CML on Imatinib, who underwent IRMA testing during the period of January 2017 to March 2019 were collected from the patient records and analyzed. IRMA was performed for failure or warning or progression, anytime during the course of treatment. IRMA was done by either Sanger sequencing (n=45) or next generation sequencing (n=26, Illumina, NGS). The associations between variables were tested using Chi - Square test. Results: Median age at diagnosis of 71 patients was 44 years (Range 18 - 71 years). Males constituted 70% (n=50). At diagnosis, 92% (n=65) of patients were in chronic phase and the remainder were in accelerated phase (n=4) or blast crisis (n=2). Mutations in the abl kinase domain were detected in 26 patients (37%). Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) could identify more mutations (13/26 - 50%) compared to conventional Sanger Sequencing (13/45 - 29%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.07). NGS could identify three or more mutations in 5 patients in contrast to Sanger. All the mutations detected were those previously described except for an insertion of 35bp near the C-Terminal which was identified in 3 patients. E459K translocation was identified in 6 patients. E355G translocation was identified in 4 patients. F359V, M351T, Y253H, G250E, H396R, T315I translocations were identified in 3 patients each. Patients who were not compliant to therapy had increased frequency of mutations (14/26 - 54%) compared to those who were compliant (12/45 - 27%), which was significantly different (p=0.02). Patients who had loss of complete hematological response (CHR) had significantly higher frequency of mutations (14/21- 67%) compared to other reasons for performing the test (p=0.001). Patients who had failure to achieve targets at various time points had a significantly lower frequency of mutations (4/23 - 17%, p=0.02) compared to other reasons for performing the test. Conclusion: Patients who were not compliant for treatment were more likely to have mutations. Loss of CHR showed an increased frequency compared to other reasons. NGS could identify mutations in more number of patients. NGS identified numerically higher mutations in patients. Larger prospective data are needed to confirm these observations. Table Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2771-2771
Author(s):  
Marcin M Machnicki ◽  
Iwona Solarska ◽  
Rafal Ploski ◽  
Ilona Seferynska ◽  
Tomasz Stoklosa

Abstract Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is currently a true chronic disease for majority of patients who achieve durable remission with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and remain in chronic phase (CML-CP) for several years. However, a number of patients develop TKI resistance and may progress to blastic phase (CML-BP) which represent major therapeutic challenge. Although CML-BP resembles acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in many aspects, including selected genetic aberrations, pathogenesis of CML progression to acute phase is not fully understood. Therefore there is a strong rationale for studying underlying mechanisms of progression to CML-BP. To gain comprehensive insight into genetic background of CML progression, we performed targeted high-throughput sequencing of sequential DNA samples from patients experiencing a treatment failure and progression to CML-BP. We inquired whether gene mutations previously described in human malignancies (with special focus on genes involved in leukemogenesis) were gained during progression or if they existed already at diagnosis. Sequential samples were collected from 5 patients, who progressed to CML-BP, despite TKI therapy and for whom samples were available from both diagnosis and progression. Roche NimbleGen SeqCap EZ custom-capture was used to acquire exonic sequences of approximately 1000 cancer-related genes, comprising genes from commercially available cancer panels (such as Illumina TrueSight Cancer, NimbleGen Comprehensive Cancer Panel) and also genes altered in hematological malignancies as reported in current literature. Common variants (>1%) gathered in ESP6500 and 1000 genomes projects and our internal exome database were filtered out. Patient CML-1 was diagnosed in CML-BP and relapsed within 13 months despite treatment with 2 TKIs. Both at the diagnosis and progression, a DNMT3A p. P799T mutation was detected with similar allele frequency. Patient CML-2 was diagnosed in CML-CP, underwent alloHSCT within 6 months from diagnosis and achieved short-term remission. However, within few months she relapsed with lymphoid BP and despite short-lived responses to combined chemotherapy and TKI, she developed 2nd BP and 3rd BP with BCR-ABL1 p. Y253H and p. T315I mutations, respectively. Strikingly, p. R320* RUNX1 mutation was present at all four time points (diagnosis in CML-CP and all three BPs), though at diagnosis frequency of this mutation was approx. 1%. Patient CML-3 wasdiagnosed in CML-BP and was treated with TKIs plus chemotherapy. After 25 months patient developed resistance and progressed. We detected IDH1 p. R132S mutation, typical for AML, exclusively in the BP sample from progression, while it was absent in diagnostic sample. Patient CML-4 was diagnosed in CML-CP, developed resistance to 3 TKIs and finally progressed to CML-BP after 5 years. P. Y183C IDH1 mutation was detected in the BP sample. Patient CML-5 was diagnosed in CP and despite treatment with TKI, progressed to CML-BP within 3,5 years. P. R139L and p. R166L RUNX1 mutations were detected only in the sample from CML-BP. All detected mutations were confirmed independently by Sanger sequencing or deep amplicon sequencing for low frequency variants. Detected mutations are summarized in table 1. Our analysis of sequential samples from CML patients proves that mutations in genes commonly mutated in myeloid malignancies (DNMT3A, IDH1, RUNX1) may be preexisting or may arise during progression, independently of BCR-ABL1 mutation. With regard to preexisting mutations, this may lead to clonal evolution of the disease. Importantly, such preexisting mutations could have been missed in the previous studies, presented or published, employing next-generation sequencing strategy, since most of those studies used algorithms to detect newly gained aberrations in CML-BP as compared to CML-CP. Table 1. Mutations detected in patients experiencing TKI resistance and progression with no detectable BCR-ABL1 mutations. Patient Time to progression [months] Mutations CML-1 13 DNMT3A p. P799T preexisting CML-2 9 RUNX1 p. R320* preexisting CML-3 25 IDH1 p. R132S acquired CML-4 63 IDH1 p. Y183C acquired CML-5 41 RUNX1 p. R139L RUNX1 p. R166L acquired acquired Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document