scholarly journals Apatinib in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer after second-line or third-line chemotherapy: a phase II, single-arm, multicentre, prospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (8) ◽  
pp. 640-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjun Xu ◽  
Zhiyu Huang ◽  
Hongyang Lu ◽  
Xinming Yu ◽  
Yuping Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Extensive Stage

Abstract Background Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains an aggressive cancer with short-term survival due to limited therapeutic options. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients with extensive-stage (EC) SCLC who had progressed after two or three previous therapies. Methods Eligible patients were histologically confirmed ES-SCLC after two or three previous treatments, including a platinum-based regimen. Patients received apatinib at an initial dose of 500 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results Forty patients were enrolled. At the data cut-off time (November 15, 2018), the median follow-up was 7.4 months; no patients remained on treatment, and five were still in follow-up. An objective response was achieved in 7 of 40 patients (17.5%) in the intention-to-treat population, and 7 of 38 patients (18.4%) in the per-protocol population. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.0 months and 5·8 months, respectively. The most commonly observed grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events were hypertension, hand–foot syndrome, increased L-gamma-glutamyltransferase. Conclusions Apatinib exhibited efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in previously heavily-treated ES-SCLC patients. Further exploration of apatinib in phase III trials is warranted. Trial registration NCT02945852.

Randomized, Phase III Study of Weekly Paclitaxel in Combination With Carboplatin Versus Standard Every-3-Weeks Administration of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandra P. Belani ◽  
Suresh Ramalingam ◽  
Michael C. Perry ◽  
Renato V. LaRocca ◽  
David Rinaldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin administered every 4 weeks to the standard regimen of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks for the treatment of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Four hundred forty-four patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomly assigned to either arm 1 (n = 223), paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 6 mg/mL · min on day 1 of each 4 week cycle, or arm 2 (n = 221), paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC = 6 on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. After four cycles of therapy, patients in both treatment arms were eligible to continue weekly paclitaxel (70 mg/m2, 3 of 4 weeks) as maintenance therapy until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Results The objective response rate was 27.6% for arm 1 and 19.2% for arm 2. Median time to progression (TTP) was 18.4 and median survival (MS) was 38.6 weeks for arm 1. For arm 2, the median TTP and MS were 16.7 weeks and 42.9 weeks respectively. Grade 3/4 anemia was more common with arm 1, although grade 2/3 neuropathy and arthralgia were less common. The remainder of the toxicities were similar between the two arms. Conclusion All efficacy parameters were similar between the two treatment arms. The favorable nonhematologic toxicity profile of arm 1 makes this an alternative treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II Study of Pemetrexed and Carboplatin Plus Bevacizumab With Maintenance Pemetrexed and Bevacizumab As First-Line Therapy for Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (20) ◽  
pp. 3284-3289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyoti D. Patel ◽  
Thomas A. Hensing ◽  
Alfred Rademaker ◽  
Eric M. Hart ◽  
Matthew G. Blum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed, carboplatin, and bevacizumab followed by maintenance pemetrexed and bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB (effusion) or stage IV nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsPatients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve of 6, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks for six cycles. For patients with response or stable disease, pemetrexed and bevacizumab were continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.ResultsFifty patients were enrolled and received treatment. The median follow-up was 13.0 months, and the median number of treatment cycles was seven (range, one to 51). Thirty patients (60%) completed ≥ six treatment cycles, and nine (18%) completed ≥ 18 treatment cycles. Among the 49 patients assessable for response, the objective response rate was 55% (95% CI, 41% to 69%). Median progression-free and overall survival rates were 7.8 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 11.5 months) and 14.1 months (95% CI, 10.8 to 19.6 months), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was modest—anemia (6%; 0), neutropenia (4%; 0), and thrombocytopenia (0; 8%). Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were proteinuria (2%; 0), venous thrombosis (4%; 2%), arterial thrombosis (2%; 0), fatigue (8%; 0), infection (8%; 2%), nephrotoxicity (2%; 0), and diverticulitis (6%; 2%). There were no grade 3 or greater hemorrhagic events or hypertension cases.ConclusionThis regimen, involving a maintenance component, was associated with acceptable toxicity and relatively long survival in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. These results justify a phase III comparison against the standard-of-care in this patient population.

Improvement of long-term survival in extensive small-cell lung cancer.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1161-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
D V Jackson ◽  
L D Case ◽  
P J Zekan ◽  
B L Powell ◽  
R D Caldwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Term Survival

The effect of adding the epipodophyllotoxin etoposide (VP-16-213) to a standard chemotherapy regimen for patients with extensive stage small-cell lung cancer was evaluated during a randomized trial. Chemotherapy consisted of vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) alone or with etoposide (EVAC). Of 139 patients enrolled, 136 patients were eligible for study and all but five were evaluable for response. The overall objective response was 46% in the VAC group v 70% in the etoposide-treated group (P = .008) with complete response (CR) rates of 12% v 29%, respectively (P = .030). Although the time to the observation of disease progression was significantly longer in the group of patients receiving etoposide (9.6 v 6.5 months, P = .010), overall survival was similar; this was probably due to administration of other agents including etoposide at the time of VAC failure. However, there were noteworthy differences in long-term (greater than or equal to 2 year) survival. Whereas only four (6%) patients treated with VAC lived 2 years, 11 (16%) of the etoposide-treated group did so (P = .100). Two-year failure-free survival was attained in one (2%) of the VAC patients and eight (11%) of the patients treated with etoposide (P = .034). Long-term survivorship, heretofore usually reported in patients with limited stage disease after a variety of treatments, may be possible with this drug combination in the setting of extensive disease.

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1632-1638 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Murray ◽  
A Shah ◽  
D Osoba ◽  
R Page ◽  
H Karsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Thoracic Irradiation ◽  
Extensive Stage

The regimen of cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) was designed to double the dose intensity of these drugs in comparison with a standard regimen (alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine [CAV] and etoposide-cisplatin [EP]) for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The dose intensity was increased by more frequent treatments rather than by increasing the dose size. The structure of this outpatient protocol includes weekly administration of chemotherapy, alternation of myelosuppressive and nonmyelosuppressive treatments, supportive corticosteroids, gastroprotective agents, and prophylactic antibiotics. Although the duration of chemotherapy was brief (9 to 12 weeks), the total cumulative doses of drugs delivered were similar to the standard regimen. Patients with no residual disease outside the chest after chemotherapy received thoracic irradiation, and patients with complete responses (CRs) received prophylactic cranial irradiation. Eligible extensive-stage SCLC patients were ambulatory, younger than 66 years of age, and free of brain metastasis. Forty-eight extensive-stage SCLC patients were treated. Forty-five (94%) responded to chemotherapy, with 19 (40%) attaining CR. After consolidative thoracic irradiation, the CR rate was 56%. The median time to progression was 43 weeks, and the median survival was 61 weeks. The 2-year survival rate was 30%. The most common site of first relapse was brain (38%). Although two patients (4%) died of toxicity, overall toxicity was acceptable for an outpatient regimen. We conclude that the CODE regimen reliably produces palliative remissions for selected extensive-stage SCLC patients, and it may be associated with durable remissions for some patients. The results of this pilot study are sufficiently promising to justify a phase III trial of CODE versus standard (alternating CAV and EP) chemotherapy.

Phase III randomized trial comparing cisplatin and carboplatin with or without ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 1388-1396 ◽  
Author(s):  
J P Sculier ◽  
M Paesmans ◽  
J Thiriaux ◽  
J Lecomte ◽  
G Bureau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Moderate Dose

PURPOSE A phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was performed to determine if the addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin improved response rate (primary end point) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 529 patients were randomized to receive a combination of moderate-dose carboplatin (200 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on day 1) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 3) with (CCI arm) or without (CC arm) ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 3). There were 248 eligible patients on the CC arm and 257 on the CCI arm, with 220 and 238 patients assessable for response, respectively. All but 23 had stage IV disease with pleural effusion. RESULTS There was a 16% objective response (OR) rate to CC and a 31% OR rate to CCI. That observed difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Duration of response and survival were not statistically different between arms. The CCI regimen was associated with significantly more acute toxicities: emesis, alopecia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The frequency of chronic renal, auditive, and peripheral neurologic toxicity was low in both arms (4.6% and 6.6%, respectively, after six courses of chemotherapy). The relative dose-intensity (RDI) of the CCI arm was significantly lower than that of the CC arm. CONCLUSION The addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin significantly improves the antitumoral response rate, but has no apparent effect an survival in advanced NSCLC.

Customizing Cisplatin Based on Quantitative Excision Repair Cross-Complementing 1 mRNA Expression: A Phase III Trial in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2747-2754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Cobo ◽  
Dolores Isla ◽  
Bartomeu Massuti ◽  
Ana Montes ◽  
Jose Miguel Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung

Purpose Although current treatment options for metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) rely on cisplatin-based chemotherapy, individualized approaches to therapy may improve response or reduce unnecessary toxicity. Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1) has been associated with cisplatin resistance. We hypothesized that assigning cisplatin based on pretreatment ERCC1 mRNA levels would improve response. Patients and Methods From August 2001 to October 2005, 444 stage IV NSCLC patients were enrolled. RNA was isolated from pretreatment biopsies, and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays were performed to determine ERCC1 mRNA expression. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to either the control or genotypic arm before ERCC1 assessment. Patients in the control arm received docetaxel plus cisplatin. In the genotypic arm, patients with low ERCC1 levels received docetaxel plus cisplatin, and those with high levels received docetaxel plus gemcitabine. The primary end point was the overall objective response rate. Results Of 444 patients enrolled, 78 (17.6%) went off study before receiving one cycle of chemotherapy, mainly due to insufficient tumor tissue for ERCC1 mRNA assessment. Of the remaining 346 patients assessable for response, objective response was attained by 53 patients (39.3%) in the control arm and 107 patients (50.7%) in the genotypic arm (P = .02). Conclusion Assessment of ERCC1 mRNA expression in patient tumor tissue is feasible in the clinical setting and predicts response to docetaxel and cisplatin. Additional studies are warranted to optimize methodologies for ERCC1 analysis in small tumor samples and to refine a multibiomarker profile predictive of patient outcome.

scholarly journals Randomized, Phase III Trial of First-Line Figitumumab in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Alone in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (19) ◽  
pp. 2059-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corey J. Langer ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Keunchil Park ◽  
Maciej Krzakowski ◽  
Daniel D. Karp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Serious Adverse Events

Purpose Figitumumab (CP-751,871), a fully human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody, inhibits the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R). Our multicenter, randomized, phase III study compared figitumumab plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent NSCLC disease with nonadenocarcinoma histology received open-label figitumumab (20 mg/kg) plus paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 6 mg · min/mL) or paclitaxel and carboplatin alone once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Of 681 randomly assigned patients, 671 received treatment. The study was closed early by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee because of futility and an increased incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and treatment-related deaths with figitumumab. Median OS was 8.6 months for figitumumab plus chemotherapy and 9.8 months for chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.40; P = .06); median progression-free survival was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.4) and 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 5.4), respectively (HR, 1.10; P = .27); the objective response rates were 33% and 35%, respectively. The respective rates of all-causality SAEs were 66% and 51%; P < .01). Treatment-related grade 5 adverse events were also more common with figitumumab (5% v 1%; P < .01). Conclusion Adding figitumumab to standard chemotherapy failed to increase OS in patients with advanced nonadenocarcinoma NSCLC. Further clinical development of figitumumab is not being pursued.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar FKB238 versus originator bevacizumab: Results from a phase III trial in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21728-e21728
Author(s):  
Konstantinos N. Syrigos ◽  
Dongyue Fu ◽  
Stephanie Jones ◽  
Zahid Bashir ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Double Blind

e21728 Background: Bevacizumab (bev) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to VEGF-A and prevents it from interacting with its receptors, thereby inhibiting formation of new tumor vasculature to block tumor growth. FKB238, a bev biosimilar, has similar pharmacokinetic and safety profiles to originator bev (o-bev). This phase 3 trial (NCT02810457) compared the efficacy and safety of FKB238 with o-bev in patients with advanced/recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). Methods: This global, multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized, comparative clinical trial enrolled and randomized 731 patients with advanced/recurrent NS-NSCLC to receive 15 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion of either FKB238 (N = 364) or o-bev (N = 367). All patients received IV infusions of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6.0) immediately prior to investigational drugs for 4-6 cycles. FKB238 and o-bev were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until objective progressive disease or other discontinuation criteria were met. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) based on blinded independent central review assessment for the intent-to-treat population was 51.6% and 53.7% for patients in the FKB238 and o-bev arms, respectively. The FKB238/o-bev ORR ratio was 0.96 (90% CI: 0.86 to 1.08) and the 90% CI fell within the pre-specified equivalence margin. The estimated proportion of patients alive and progression free at 12 months was 25.0% in the FKB238 arm vs 25.3% in the o-bev arm (HR of 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.16). The estimated median progression-free survival was 7.72 months in the FKB238 arm and 7.62 months in the o-bev arm. TEAEs were reported for 94.2% (FKB238) and 95.1% (o-bev) of patients. TEAEs ≥ grade 3 were reported for 53.6% (FKB238) and 55.5% (o-bev) of patients. SAEs were reported for 25.1% and 26.0% of patients treated with FKB238 and o-bev, respectively. Conclusions: There were no meaningful differences in efficacy and safety between FKB238 or o-bev in patients with NS-NSCLC. ORR efficacy equivalence was demonstrated, and the safety profiles of both drugs were similar. Clinical trial information: NCT02810457.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document