Comment on: Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora

The Visual Functioning-14 (VF-14) scale is the most widely employed index of vision-related functional impairment and serves as a patient-reported outcome measure in vision-specific quality of life. The purpose of this study is to rigorously examine and validate the VF-14 scale on a Greek population of ophthalmic patients employing Rasch measurement techniques. Two cohorts of patients were sampled in two waves. The first cohort included 150 cataract patients and the second 150 patients with other ophthalmic diseases. The patients were sampled first while pending surgical or other corrective therapy and two months after receiving therapy. The original 14-item VF-14 demonstrated poor measurement precision and disordered response category thresholds. A revised eight-item version, the VF-8G (‘G’ for ‘Greek’), was tested and confirmed for validity in the cataract research population. No differential functioning was reported for gender, age, and underlying disorder. Improvement in the revised scale correlated with improvement in the mental and physical component of the general health scale SF-36. In conclusion, our findings support the use of the revised form of the VF-14 for assessment of vision-specific functioning and quality of life improvement in populations with cataracts and other visual diseases than cataracts, a result that has not been statistically confirmed previously.

Download Full-text

Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the Spanish version of the Thyroid-Related Quality-of-Life Patient-Reported Outcome (ThyPRO) questionnaire

Endocrine Abstracts ◽

10.1530/endoabs.56.p1056 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Lleo Ana Maria Gonzalez ◽

Mauro Boronat Cortes ◽

Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen ◽

Carlos Rodriguez Perez ◽

AEse Krogh Rasmussen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Cross Cultural ◽

Spanish Version ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Related Quality ◽

Cultural Validation

Download Full-text

An assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity: identifying oncologic benefit and an evidence-practice gap in routine clinical practice

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes ◽

10.1186/s12955-020-01648-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Miss Charlotte L. Moss ◽

Ajay Aggarwal ◽

Asad Qureshi ◽

Benjamin Taylor ◽

Teresa Guerrero-Urbano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Abdominal Cavity ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Oncologic Outcomes ◽

Review Of The Literature ◽

Outcome Measurements ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Cancer Setting

Abstract Background Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of patient management in the cancer setting, providing broad perspectives on patients’ quality of life and experience. The use of PROMs is, however, generally limited to the context of randomised control trials, as healthcare services are challenged to sustain high quality of care whilst facing increasing demand and financial shortfalls. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify any oncological benefit of using PROMs and investigate the wider impact on patient experience, in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity specifically. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (Pubmed) and Ovid Gateway (Embase and Ovid) until April 2020. Studies investigating the oncological outcomes of PROMs were deemed suitable for inclusion. Results A total of 21 studies were included from 2167 screened articles. Various domains of quality of life (QoL) were identified as potential prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity, independent of other clinicopathological features of disease: 3 studies identified global QoL as a prognostic factor, 6 studies identified physical and role functioning, and 2 studies highlighted fatigue. In addition to improved outcomes, a number of included studies also reported that the use of PROMs enhanced both patient-clinician communication and patient satisfaction with care in the clinical setting. Conclusions This review highlights the necessity of routine collection of PROMs within the pelvic abdominal cancer setting to improve patient quality of life and outcomes.

Download Full-text

Psychometric validation and meaningful within‐patient change of the Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life questionnaire version 2.1 electronic patient‐reported outcome in patients with episodic and chronic migraine

Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain ◽

10.1111/head.14031 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Rebecca M. Speck ◽

Ren Yu ◽

Janet H. Ford ◽

David W. Ayer ◽

Rohit Bhandari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Chronic Migraine ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Psychometric Validation ◽

Life Questionnaire ◽

Quality Of Life Questionnaire ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Questionnaire Version ◽

Patient Change

Download Full-text

Significance of patient-reported outcomes for occupational resumption and quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.3107 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

A Salzwedel ◽

I Koran ◽

E Langheim ◽

A Schlitt ◽

J Nothroff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Physical Performance ◽

Well Being ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Funding Source ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Returning To Work

Abstract Introduction Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs based on the bio-psycho-social approach of the international classification of functioning and disease are carried out to achieve improved prognosis, superior health-related quality of life (HRQL) and social integration. We aimed to identify predictors of returning to work (RTW) and HRQL among cardiovascular risk factors and physical performance as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) modifiable during CR. Methods We designed a prospective observational multi-center study and enrolled 1,586 patients (2017/18) in 12 German rehabilitation centers regardless of their primary allocation diagnoses (e.g. acute myocardial infarction (AMI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular disease). Besides general data (e.g. age, gender, diagnoses), parameters of risk factor management (e.g. smoking, lipid profile, hypertension, lifestyle change motivation), physical performance (e.g. maximum exercise capacity, endurance training load, 6-min walking distance), and PROMs (e.g. depression, heart-focused anxiety, HRQL, subjective well-being, somatic and mental health, pain, general self-efficacy, pension desire as well as self-assessment of occupational prognosis using several questionnaires) were documented at CR admission and discharge. 6 months after discharge, status of RTW and HRQL (SF-12) were captured by a follow-up (FU) survey and analyzed in multivariable regression models with multiple imputation of missing values. Results Out of the study participants, 1,262 patients (54±7 years, 77% men) responded to the follow-up survey and could be analyzed regarding the outcome parameters. Most of them were assigned to CR primarily due to AMI (40%) or CAD without myocardial infarction (18%), followed by heart valve diseases in 12% of patients and CABG (8%). 864 patients (69%) returned to work within the follow-up period. Pension desire, negative self-assessed occupational prognosis, heart-focussed anxiety, major life events, smoking and heart failure were negatively associated with RTW, while higher endurance training load, HRQL and work stress were positively associated (Figure 1). HRQL after 6 months was determined more by PROMs (e.g. pension desire, heart-focused anxiety, physical/mental HRQL in SF-12, physical/mental health in indicators of rehab-status questionnaire (IRES-24), stress, well-being in the World Health Organization well-being index and self-efficacy expectations) than by clinical parameters or physical performance. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome measures predominantly influenced RTW and HRQL in heart-disease patients, whereas patients' pension desire and heart-focussed anxiety had a dominant impact on all investigated endpoints. Therefore, the multi-component CR approach focussing on psychosocial support is crucial for subjective health prognosis and occupational resumption. Figure 1. Predictors of returning to work Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): German pension insurance

Download Full-text