scholarly journals The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: Report 7, immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery in the UK: Current practice and patient selection

Eye ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1866-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Buchan ◽  
Paul H. J. Donachie ◽  
Andy Cassels-Brown ◽  
Christopher Liu ◽  
Andrew Pyott ◽  
...  
Eye ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 552-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
A C Day ◽  
◽  
P H J Donachie ◽  
J M Sparrow ◽  
R L Johnston

2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Z Osman ◽  
M K Aneeshkumar ◽  
R W Clarke

Approximately half a million children in England and Wales receive in-patient or day-case surgical treatment annually. Otolaryngology is the surgical specialty that provides the greatest number of episodes of such care. As 30–50 per cent of our total volume of work is paediatric, we feel it is important to assess current attitudes to paediatric otolaryngological practice. In its year 2000 document Children’s Surgery: a First Class Service, The Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) of England sets out recommendations on how children’s surgical services should be delivered in the UK. A postal questionnaire was sent to all UK-based ENT consultant members of the British Association of Otorhinolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons (BAO-HNS). The questionnaire was designed to assess the current practice of paediatric otolaryngology in the UK with an emphasis on the RCS recommendations. Wide variations were found, and they are discussed with reference to the recommendations.


Eye ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Johnston ◽  
Alexander C. Day ◽  
Paul H. J. Donachie ◽  
John M. Sparrow

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eunkyung Lee ◽  
Bagishan Balasingam ◽  
Emily Mills ◽  
Mehran Zarei-Ghanavati ◽  
Christopher Liu

Abstract Purpose To examine the attitudes and beliefs of UK ophthalmologists towards Immediately Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (ISBCS); explore their reasons to either practise or not practise ISBCS; identify barriers hindering its implementation in the UK. Setting Consultant members of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth, UK) Design Survey-based, questionnaire Methods Distributed to members and collected electronically. An initial screening question in regards to prior experience with ISBCS directed the rest of the survey; participants were asked to rate the importance of several factors with regards to performing ISBCS. Free text options were also available. Descriptive analysis was subsequently performed. Results Of the 1357 recipients, 130 (9.6%) ophthalmologists completed the survey. Of those, 13.9% were currently performing ISBCS, 83.1% had never performed, and 3.1% had previously done so but since stopped. The main factors that acted as barriers were lack of: (1) College approval (20.5%); (2) medico-legal approval (20.2%); (3) evidence to support the use of ISBCS (16.0%); and (4) hospital approval (13.3%). Additionally, the perceived risk of complications for patients played an important role when considering ISBCS, with the risk of endophthalmitis being most feared. Conclusions This survey demonstrates some of the barriers that prevent ophthalmologist’s performing ISBCS in the UK. There is a need for further exploration in this field to evaluate the effect of addressing any of these concerns on the implementation of ISBCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document