scholarly journals Helicase Q promotes homology-driven DNA double-strand break repair and prevents tandem duplications

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kamp ◽  
B. B. L. G. Lemmens ◽  
R. J. Romeijn ◽  
S. C. Changoer ◽  
R. van Schendel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Instability ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Cellular Survival ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Tandem Duplications

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks are a major threat to cellular survival and genetic integrity. In addition to high fidelity repair, three intrinsically mutagenic DNA break repair routes have been described, i.e. single-strand annealing (SSA), polymerase theta-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) and residual ill-defined microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) activity. Here, we identify C. elegans Helicase Q (HELQ-1) as being essential for MMEJ as well as for SSA. We also find HELQ-1 to be crucial for the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) mode of homologous recombination (HR). Loss of HELQ-1 leads to increased genome instability: patchwork insertions arise at deletion junctions due to abortive rounds of polymerase theta activity, and tandem duplications spontaneously accumulate in genomes of helq-1 mutant animals as a result of TMEJ of abrogated HR intermediates. Our work thus implicates HELQ activity for all DSB repair modes guided by complementary base pairs and provides mechanistic insight into mutational signatures common in HR-defective cancers.

scholarly journals Meiotic Double-Strand Break Proteins Influence Repair Pathway Utilization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith L. Yanowitz ◽  
Nicolas Macaisne ◽  
Zebulin Kessler
Keyword(s):  
Strand Break ◽  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Chromosome Fusions ◽  
Strand Annealing

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious lesions DNA can endure. Yet, DSBs are programmed at the onset of meiosis and are required to facilitate appropriate reduction of ploidy in daughter cells. Repair of these break is tightly controlled to favor homologous recombination (HR), the only repair pathway that can form crossovers. However, little is known about how the activities of alternative repair pathways are regulated at these stages. We discovered an unexpected synthetic interaction between the DSB machinery and strand-exchange proteins. Depleting theC. elegansDSB-promoting factors HIM-5 and DSB-2 suppresses the formation of chromosome fusions that arise in the absence of RAD-51 or other strand-exchange mediators. Our investigations reveal that non-homologous and theta-mediated end joining (c-NHEJ and TMEJ, respectively) and single strand annealing (SSA) function redundantly to repair DSBs when HR is compromised and that HIM-5 influences the utilization of TMEJ and SSA.

scholarly journals Behavior of dicentric chromosomes in budding yeast

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. e1009442
Author(s):  
Diana Cook ◽  
Sarah Long ◽  
John Stanton ◽  
Patrick Cusick ◽  
Colleen Lawrimore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phenotypic Diversity ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dicentric Chromosomes ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

DNA double-strand breaks arisein vivowhen a dicentric chromosome (two centromeres on one chromosome) goes through mitosis with the two centromeres attached to opposite spindle pole bodies. Repair of the DSBs generates phenotypic diversity due to the range of monocentric derivative chromosomes that arise. To explore whether DSBs may be differentially repaired as a function of their spatial position in the chromosome, we have examined the structure of monocentric derivative chromosomes from cells containing a suite of dicentric chromosomes in which the distance between the two centromeres ranges from 6.5 kb to 57.7 kb. Two major classes of repair products, homology-based (homologous recombination (HR) and single-strand annealing (SSA)) and end-joining (non-homologous (NHEJ) and micro-homology mediated (MMEJ)) were identified. The distribution of repair products varies as a function of distance between the two centromeres. Genetic dependencies on double strand break repair (Rad52), DNA ligase (Lif1), and S phase checkpoint (Mrc1) are indicative of distinct repair pathway choices for DNA breaks in the pericentromeric chromatin versus the arms.

scholarly journals Rejoining of DNA Double-Strand Breaks as a Function of Overhang Length

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 896-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Daley ◽  
Thomas E. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Gc Content ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Primary Determinant ◽  
Overhang Length ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT The ends of spontaneously occurring double-strand breaks (DSBs) may contain various lengths of single-stranded DNA, blocking lesions, and gaps and flaps generated by end annealing. To investigate the processing of such structures, we developed an assay in which annealed oligonucleotides are ligated onto the ends of a linearized plasmid which is then transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Reconstitution of a marker occurs only when the oligonucleotides are incorporated and repair is in frame, permitting rapid analysis of complex DSB ends. Here, we created DSBs with compatible overhangs of various lengths and asked which pathways are required for their precise repair. Three mechanisms of rejoining were observed, regardless of overhang polarity: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), a Rad52-dependent single-strand annealing-like pathway, and a third mechanism independent of the first two mechanisms. DSBs with overhangs of less than 4 bases were mainly repaired by NHEJ. Repair became less dependent on NHEJ when the overhangs were longer or had a higher GC content. Repair of overhangs greater than 8 nucleotides was as much as 150-fold more efficient, impaired 10-fold by rad52 mutation, and highly accurate. Reducing the microhomology extent between long overhangs reduced their repair dramatically, to less than NHEJ of comparable short overhangs. These data support a model in which annealing energy is a primary determinant of the rejoining efficiency and mechanism.

scholarly journals RecF and RecR Play Critical Roles in the Homologous Recombination and Single-Strand Annealing Pathways of Mycobacteria

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (19) ◽  
pp. 3121-3132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Gupta ◽  
Stewart Shuman ◽  
Michael S. Glickman
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Central Position ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACTMycobacteria encode three DNA double-strand break repair pathways: (i) RecA-dependent homologous recombination (HR), (ii) Ku-dependent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), and (iii) RecBCD-dependent single-strand annealing (SSA). Mycobacterial HR has two presynaptic pathway options that rely on the helicase-nuclease AdnAB and the strand annealing protein RecO, respectively. Ablation ofadnABorrecOindividually causes partial impairment of HR, but loss ofadnABandrecOin combination abolishes HR. RecO, which can accelerate annealing of single-stranded DNAin vitro, also participates in the SSA pathway. The functions of RecF and RecR, which, in other model bacteria, function in concert with RecO as mediators of RecA loading, have not been examined in mycobacteria. Here, we present a genetic analysis ofrecFandrecRin mycobacterial recombination. We find that RecF, like RecO, participates in the AdnAB-independent arm of the HR pathway and in SSA. In contrast, RecR is required for all HR in mycobacteria and for SSA. The essentiality of RecR as an agent of HR is yet another distinctive feature of mycobacterial DNA repair.IMPORTANCEThis study clarifies the molecular requirements for homologous recombination in mycobacteria. Specifically, we demonstrate that RecF and RecR play important roles in both the RecA-dependent homologous recombination and RecA-independent single-strand annealing pathways. Coupled with our previous findings (R. Gupta, M. Ryzhikov, O. Koroleva, M. Unciuleac, S. Shuman, S. Korolev, and M. S. Glickman, Nucleic Acids Res 41:2284–2295, 2013,http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1298), these results revise our view of mycobacterial recombination and place the RecFOR system in a central position in homology-dependent DNA repair.

scholarly journals Analysis of BRCA1 Variants in Double-Strand Break Repair by Homologous Recombination and Single-Strand Annealing

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
William I. Towler ◽  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Derek J. R. Ransburgh ◽  
Amanda E. Toland ◽  
Chikashi Ishioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
Strand Annealing

scholarly journals FKBP25 participates in DNA double-strand break repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Dilworth ◽  
Fade Gong ◽  
Kyle Miller ◽  
Christopher J. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Peptide Bonds ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Fk506 Binding Proteins

FK506-binding proteins (FKBPs) alter the conformation of proteins via cis–trans isomerization of prolyl-peptide bonds. While this activity can be demonstrated in vitro, the intractability of detecting prolyl isomerization events in cells has limited our understanding of the biological processes regulated by FKBPs. Here we report that FKBP25 is an active participant in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). FKBP25 influences DSB repair pathway choice by promoting homologous recombination (HR) and suppressing single-strand annealing (SSA). Consistent with this observation, cells depleted of FKBP25 form fewer Rad51 repair foci in response to etoposide and ionizing radiation, and they are reliant on the SSA repair factor Rad52 for viability. We find that FKBP25’s catalytic activity is required for promoting DNA repair, which is the first description of a biological function for this enzyme activity. Consistent with the importance of the FKBP catalytic site in HR, rapamycin treatment also impairs homologous recombination, and this effect is at least in part independent of mTor. Taken together these results identify FKBP25 as a component of the DNA DSB repair pathway.

scholarly journals Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconservative pathway that leads to crossover products.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
F L Lin ◽  
K Sperle ◽  
N Sternberg
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Dna Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Break ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Double Strand Break Repair ◽  
L Cells ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Repair ◽  
Strand Annealing

We describe experiments designed to measure the efficiency of intermolecular recombination between mutant herpesvirus thymidine kinase (tk) genes introduced into mouse L cells. Recombinants were scored as stable transformants containing a functional tk gene. The two recombination substrates used were ptkB8, a pBR322-based plasmid containing a mutant tk gene, with a BamHI linker in an SphI restriction site that is centrally located within the gene, and mp10tk delta 3' delta 5', an mp10 vector with a tk gene deleted at both the 3' and 5' ends. The only homology shared by the two DNAs is 885 base pairs within the tk gene. To determine whether the double-strand break repair model that has been used to explain recombination in yeast cells (J. W. Szostak, T. L. Orr-Weaver, R. J. Rothstein, and F. W. Stahl, Cell 33:25-35, 1983) can account for recombination during the introduction of these DNAs into mammalian cells, we transformed cells with BamHI-linearized ptkB8 and supercoiled mp10tk delta 3' delta 5' replicative-form DNA. These two DNAs should recombine efficiently according to that model and should generate gene conversion products. In this reaction, the supercoiled DNA acts as the donor of information to repair the cleaved tk gene. Our results indicated that the efficiency of this reaction was very low (less than 10 transformants were obtained per 0.1 microgram of each DNA used in the reaction per 10(6) cells). In contrast, if BamHI-cleaved ptkB8 DNA was cotransformed into cells along with a circular DNA molecule containing a tk gene deleted only at its 3' end or only at its 5' end (mp10tk delta 3' or mp10tk delta 5'), then the efficiency of recombination could be more than 4 orders of magnitude higher than it was with circular mp10tk delta 3' delta 5' DNA. Recombination frequencies were highest when the tk delta 3' or tk delta 5' DNA used was cleaved at the tk deletion junction. Southern analyses of DNA from TK+ transformants generated with BamHI-cleaved ptkB8 and BamHI-cleaved mp10tk delta 3' DNAs indicated that recombination was almost always associated with the reassortment of markers flanking the reconstructed tk DNA. Together, these results are more consistent with the nonconservative single-strand annealing model for recombination that we proposed several years ago (F.-L. Lin, K. Sperle, and N. Sternberg, Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1020-1034, 1984) than they are with the double-strand break repair model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document