scholarly journals Effects of neoadjuvant trastuzumab, pertuzumab and palbociclib on Ki67 in HER2 and ER-positive breast cancer

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Gianni ◽  
Marco Colleoni ◽  
Giancarlo Bisagni ◽  
Mauro Mansutti ◽  
Claudio Zamagni ◽  
...  

AbstractThe crosstalk between estrogen and HER2 receptors and cell-cycle regulation sustains resistance to endocrine therapy of HER2- and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. We earlier reported that women with HER2 and ER-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant dual HER2-block and palbociclib in the NA-PHER2 trial had Ki67 decrease and 27% pathological complete responses (pCR). We extended NA-PHER2 to Cohort B using dual HER2-block and palbociclib without fulvestrant and report here Ki67 drops at week-2 (mean change −25.7), at surgery (after 16 weeks, mean change −9.5), high objective response (88.5%) and pCR (19.2%). In Cohort C [Ki67 > 20% and HER2low (IHC 1+/2+ without gene amplification)], women also received fulvestrant, had dramatic Ki67 drop at week 2 (−29.5) persisting at surgery (−19.3), and objective responses in 78.3%. In view of the favorable tolerability and of the efficacy-predictive value of Ki67 drop at week-2, the chemotherapy-free approach of NA-PHER2 deserves further investigation in HER2 and ER-positive breast cancer. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02530424.

Author(s):  
Kathleen I. Pritchard ◽  
Jonas Bergh ◽  
Harold J. Burstein

Overview: There is great appreciation for the heterogeneity of breast cancers, particularly of hormone-receptor positive breast cancers. A goal of modern oncology managing such heterogeneity is to determine how to individualize therapy based on the specific pathological and biological features of a given tumor. Two distinctive clinical literatures exist to guide treatment of hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. The Oxford Overview, a seminal meta-analysis effort, has recently been updated, and suggests that nearly all patients with ER-positive tumors benefit from adjuvant endocrine therapy. In addition, the overview finds that nearly all subsets of patients with ER-positive tumors also benefit from modern adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Meanwhile, retrospective subset analyses of specific trials or populations suggests that the benefits of chemotherapy are not so uniform, and in particular that molecular diagnostics assays can identify patients who do not warrant chemotherapy. This article will highlight recent data and controversies in personalizing adjuvant breast cancer therapy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4882-4882
Author(s):  
Jasmine Kamboj ◽  
Elie Chalhoub ◽  
Peter E. Friedell

Abstract Introduction Cyclin-dependant kinases (CDKs) are a family of serine threonine kinases regulating cell cycle progression. The interaction of cyclin D (encoded by CCND1) with CDK4/6 helps in hyper-phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma (Rb) gene product, which further facilitates in progression through G1 to S phase of the cell cycle. Oncogenic signals in Hormone Receptor(HR)-positive breast cancer facilitate CCND1 amplification and overexpression of CDK4/6 to drive breast cancer proliferation and are associated with endocrine resistance in breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors selectively inhibit CDK4 and CDK6, resulting in loss of RB1 phosphorylation, henceforth blocking cell cycle progression and causing G1 phase arrest. These agents have profound activity in hormone receptor positive breast cancer cell lines and work synergistically with endocrine therapies to combat endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Neutropenia is a known side effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors, with an incidence as high as 70%. Anemia as a side effect has been reported with low incidence. We report macrocytosis in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed at Sanford Health Bemidji. IRB approval was sought prior to initiation of the review. All patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitor in combination with hormonal therapy from 1/2016-2/2018 were included. Dates for initiating CDK4/6 inhibitor, onset of macrocytosis, maximum mean corpuscular volume (MCV-max) achieved, correlation of time with rising MCV (MCV-t) and normalization of MCV in the absence of CDK4/6 inhibitor (reversibility of macrocytosis) was documented. Complete Blood Count (CBC) was reviewed. Work up for elevated MCV was performed in each patient. Bone marrow biopsies were not performed. Results Table. All patients (n=6) had rising MCV, within 4-6 weeks of initiation of the CDK4/6 inhibitor. Time to achieve MCV more than 100, varied from 3 to 7 months, this timing did not correlate well with baseline MCV. Progressively rising MCV with the duration of use of CDK4/6 inhibitor was seen. Reversibility of MCV was seen in 3 patients (Case B, C and D) who had interruption of CDK4/6 inhibitor for health related issues. Normalization of MCV on discontinuation of CDK4/6 inhibitor and rise in MCV on resumption of CDK4/6 inhibitor was seen. Hemoglobin drop from the baseline was not seen in any of the patients. Apart from neutropenia and macrocytosis, no other abnormality was seen on CBC. Stability of disease was documented in all patients on first set of scans done at 3 months and radiologic complete remission was documented in approximately 6-9 months of being on CDK4/6 inhibition. Macrocytosis workup was performed in all patients, including vitamin B12, folic acid, TSH, reticulocyte count, peripheral smear reviews and liver function tests. Vitamin B12 was low normal in case D, and was supplemented, without any changes seen on MCV. Conclusions CDK4/6 inhibition has become extremely prevalent in the recent times for hormone receptor positive breast cancer. We hypothesize that CDK4/6 inhibition produces reversible macrocytic anemia of unknown clinical significance. Given all patients had elevation in MCV along with complete radiologic remission, there is a possible causal relationship of elevated MCV and treatment response. The long-term clinical significance of observed macrocytosis and possible dysplasia, are important questions that need to be answered in large clinical trials. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 584-584
Author(s):  
Emre Koca ◽  
Polly Ann Niravath ◽  
Joe Ensor ◽  
Tejal Amar Patel ◽  
Xiaoxian Li ◽  
...  

584 Background: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is standard care for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, both primary and acquired endocrine resistance is not uncommon, thereby limiting efficacy. [1] The PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway is a major mediator of endocrine resistance. [2,3] Therefore, we determined the efficacy and safety of the mTORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 in combination with tamoxifen in neoadjuvant setting. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label phase II trial, newly diagnosed patients with stage I−III ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer received TAK-228 (30 mg weekly) and tamoxifen (20 mg daily) for 16 weeks until 2-4 weeks prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was the change in Ki67 after 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints included pathological complete response rate (pCR), preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score, and safety. Results: Of the 28 patients enrolled in the study, 3 were excluded due to non-compliance. Mean patient age was 51.7 years. Most patients had stage I or II disease (12 [43%] each); 4 (14%) had stage III disease. Mean Ki67 was significantly lowered from baseline to Week 6 (17.2% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.0023). Interestingly, mean Ki67 increased to 20.1% from baseline to the time of surgery. This may have been due to a rebound effect, as TAK-228 was discontinued 2-4 weeks prior to surgery. Tumor size also significantly decreased from baseline to surgery, with a median decrease of 0.75 centimeters (p < 0.0001). PEPI score was intermediate risk (score 1−3) in 6 patients and high risk group (score ≥4) in 15 patients. No patients achieved a PEPI score of 0 and no pCR was achieved. Overall, the combination was well tolerated, the most common side effects were nausea (72%), vomiting (72%), fatigue (72%), mucositis (45%), and headache (45%). The any Grade 3 AE rate was 7.7%. Conclusions: The TAK-228 and tamoxifen combination was found to be an effective neoadjuvant strategy with a favorable safety profile in newly diagnosed patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Further molecular analysis (PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway) are pending and will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02988986.


Breast Care ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Almstedt ◽  
Marcus Schmidt

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with different molecular subtypes. Most tumours are hormone receptor positive (luminal subtype) with potential endocrine responsiveness. Endocrine therapy is commonly used in these patients. Disease progression caused by endocrine resistance represents a significant challenge in the treatment of breast cancer. To understand the mechanisms of resistance of long-term oestrogen-deprived breast cancer cells, it is important to focus on cross-talk between steroid receptor signalling and other growth factor receptors and intracellular pathways. (Pre-)clinical trials showed that co-targeting these pathways can restore endocrine sensitivity. The focus of the current review is on the intracellular PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway and cyclin-dependant kinases (CDKs) in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Study results clearly show that both inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and CDK4/6 are promising ways to improve the efficacy of endocrine treatment in ER-positive breast cancer patients with comparably few side effects. Further clinical trials are needed to identify the patient population who would benefit most from a dual inhibition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document