scholarly journals Loss of coral reef growth capacity to track future increases in sea level

Nature ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 558 (7710) ◽  
pp. 396-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris T. Perry ◽  
Lorenzo Alvarez-Filip ◽  
Nicholas A. J. Graham ◽  
Peter J. Mumby ◽  
Shaun K. Wilson ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Masselink ◽  
Robert McCall ◽  
Edward Beetham ◽  
Paul Simon Kench ◽  
Curt D. Storlazzi

2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Masselink ◽  
R. McCall ◽  
E. Beetham ◽  
P. Kench ◽  
C. Storlazzi

Geology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Harris ◽  
Jody M. Webster ◽  
Ana Vila-Concejo ◽  
Quan Hua ◽  
Yusuke Yokoyama ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 50-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tubagus Solihuddin ◽  
Lindsay.B. Collins ◽  
David Blakeway ◽  
Michael J. O' Leary

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Morwenn Pastier ◽  
Luca Malatesta ◽  
Kimberly Huppert ◽  
Denovan Chauveau

<p>Sequences of coral reef terraces result from the interplay between biogenic and clastic sedimentary production, relative sea level (RSL) variations, wave erosion and tectonic forcing. Reefal sequences are gold standard proxies for paleo-sea level and tectonic reconstructions, but their contribution is usually restricted to a bijective approach, correlating the single elevation and age of their inner edge to single sea level stands or coseismic offsets, and reciprocally. The increase of available data, such as coral datings and high resolution topography revealed major deviations from this bijective approach (corals from a single MIS on several terraces, and conversely, or MIS highstands not represented in a sequence).</p><p>The Cape Laundi sequence, Sumba island, Indonesia, demonstrates such deviations, with outcrops of corals from MIS 5e on as many as three terraces instead of a single terrace as commonly expected. A preliminar numerical model of coral reef terrace profile has been developed, integrating reef growth, wave erosion, RSL variations and tectonic deformation. The interplay between reef growth rate, tectonic displacements and RSL variations provides a plausible explanation for these numerous occurrences. The low growth rate of this reef appears to prevent coral from  saturating the accommodation space generated during sea level transgression, leading to the preservation of drowned platforms and reefal construction of similar age during regressions.</p><p>Preliminary results from numerical modeling reveal complex feedbacks between the processes shaping these morphologies. Tectonic deformation has a major influence on reef development, by favoring reef preservation at high uplift rates and controlling the available accommodation space for reef growth.. By taking into account the numerous feedbacks controlling reef morphology, we can investigate the significance of RSL variations, continuous and punctual rock uplift, biogenic activity, and clastic inputs on coral terrace morphology and chronostratigraphy. Our approach can bring crucial constraints to the rates and frequency of RSL variations. To do so, we further develop our numerical model in order to provide more robust insights on the controls of reefal sequences morphologies. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document