scholarly journals MP68-18 CONSOLE-INTEGRATED REAL-TIME THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) PHYSICAL MODEL NAVIGATION FOR ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY IN PATIENT WITH HIGHLY COMPLEX RENAL TUMORS (RENAL NEPHROMETRY SCORE≥7)

2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e1042
Author(s):  
Jung Kwon Kim* ◽  
Hakmin Lee ◽  
Jong Jin Oh ◽  
Sangchul Lee ◽  
Seong Jin Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Physical Model ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Nephrometry Score

scholarly journals Tumor volume and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline predict renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruyuki Ohsugi ◽  
Kyojiro Akiyama ◽  
Hisanori Taniguchi ◽  
Masaaki Yanishi ◽  
Motohiko Sugi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Perioperative Morbidity

AbstractThere are several nephrometry scoring systems for predicting surgical complexity and potential perioperative morbidity. The R.E.N.A.L. scoring system, one of the most well-known nephrometry scoring systems, emphasizes the features on which it is based (Radius, Exophytic/endophytic, Nearness to collecting system or sinus, Anterior/posterior, and Location relative to polar lines). The ability of these nephrometry scoring systems to predict loss of renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) remains controversial. Therefore, we verified which combination of factors from nephrometry scoring systems, including tumor volume, was the most significant predictor of postoperative renal function. Patients who underwent RPN for cT1 renal tumors in our hospital were reviewed retrospectively (n = 163). The preoperative clinical data (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], comorbidities, and nephrometry scoring systems including R.E.N.A.L.) and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. We also calculated the tumor volume using the equation applied to an ellipsoid by three-dimensional computed tomography. The primary outcome was reduced eGFR, which was defined as an eGFR reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline to 6 months after RPN. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationships between preoperative variables and reduced eGFR. Of 163 patients, 24 (14.7%) had reduced eGFR. Multivariable analyses indicated that tumor volume (cutoff value ≥ 14.11 cm3, indicating a sphere with a diameter ≥ approximately 3 cm) and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline were independent factors associated with a reduced eGFR (odds ratio [OR] 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.69–12.30; P = 0.003 and OR 3.50; 95% CI 1.30–9.46; P = 0.034, respectively). Our classification system using these two factors showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) than previous nephrometry scoring systems (AUC = 0.786 vs. 0.653–0.719), and it may provide preoperative information for counseling patients about renal function after RPN.

scholarly journals Three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with renal tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 4324-4332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Fan ◽  
Yanbin Meng ◽  
Shuai Zhu ◽  
Mingji Ye ◽  
Mingfeng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Physical Model ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Postoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
Dimensional Printing

Objectives To explore the efficacy of three-dimensional printing physical model-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (3D-LPN) in patients with renal tumors. Methods We retrospectively assessed all patients who underwent LPN with or without 3D-printed physical model assistance from January 2016 to February 2018 at our institution. The demographic characteristics, operative findings, and clinical outcomes from the procedure were collected and analyzed. Results Sixty-nine patients underwent 3D-LPN and 58 underwent traditional LPN. The groups showed no differences in demographics, RENAL score, surgical approach, operative time, estimated intra-/postoperative blood loss, increased creatinine level, or complications. In the 3D-LPN group, warm ischemia time was shorter, whereas surgery waiting time was longer, compared with those parameters in the LPN group. Subgroup analysis indicated that for patients with RENAL score ≥8, the 3D-LPN group had significantly shorter warm ischemic time and less intraoperative blood loss than the traditional LPN group. Intra- and postoperative hospital complication rates were similar for 3D-LPN and traditional LPN groups (8.7% vs. 13.7%). Conclusions 3D printing provides an additional tool to assist with LPN. Use of a 3D model can assist in planning and performance of LPN in patients with RENAL score ≥8.

scholarly journals Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy For Renal Tumors With A RENAL Nephrometry Score≥7: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Biao Zhou ◽  
Xin Xiao ◽  
Tian-Li Shi ◽  
Xiao-Hui Huang ◽  
Yu-Li Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Positive Surgical Margin ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Nephrometry Score ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Abstract Background To compare the perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register for studies from 2000 to 2020 to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of RPN and LPN in patients with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7. We used RevMan 5.2 to pool the data. Results Seven studies were acquired in our study. No significant differences were found in the estimated blood loss (WMD: 34.49; 95% CI: -75.16-144.14; p=0.54), hospital stay (WMD: -0.59; 95% CI: -1.24–0.06; p=0.07), positive surgical margin (OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.65–1.11; p =0.23), major postoperative complications(OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.52–1.54; p=0.69) and transfusion (OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.48–1.08; p =0.11) between the groups. RPN showed better outcomes in the operating time (WMD: -22.45; 95% CI: -35.06 to -9.85; p=0.0005), postoperative renal function (WMD: 3.32; 95% CI: 0.73–5.91; p=0.01), warm ischemia time (WMD: -6.96; 95% CI: -7.30–-6.62; p <0.0001), conversion rate to radical nephrectomy (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66; p=0.002) and intraoperative complications (OR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.28–0.97; p=0.04).Conclusions RPN showed better perioperative clinical outcomes than LPN for the treatment of complex renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score≥7.

scholarly journals Case Report: Optimizing Pre- and Intraoperative Planning With Hyperaccuracy Three-Dimensional Virtual Models for a Challenging Case of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Two Complex Renal Masses in a Horseshoe Kidney

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Campi ◽  
Francesco Sessa ◽  
Anna Rivetti ◽  
Alessio Pecoraro ◽  
Paolo Barzaghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Mass ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Horseshoe Kidney ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Masses ◽  
Virtual Models ◽  
Intraoperative Planning

Objective: To report a case of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for two highly complex renal tumors in a patient with a Horseshoe kidney (HSK), focusing on the utility of hyperaccuracy three-dimensional (HA3D) virtual models for accurate preoperative and intraoperative planning of the procedure.Methods: A 74-year-old Caucasian male patient was referred to our Unit for incidental detection of two complex renal masses in the left portion of a HSK. The 50 × 55 mm, larger, predominantly exophytic renal mass was located at the middle-lower pole of the left-sided kidney (PADUA score 9). The 16 × 17 mm, smaller, hilar renal mass was located at the middle-higher pole of the left-sided kidney (PADUA score 9). Contrast-enhanced CT scan images in DICOM format were processed using a dedicated software to achieve a HA3D virtual reconstructions. RAPN was performed by a highly experienced surgeon using the da Vinci Si robotic platform with a three-arm configuration. A selective delayed clamping strategy was adopted for resection of the larger renal mass while a clampless strategy was adopted for the smaller renal mass. An enucleative resection strategy was pursued for both tumors.Results: The overall operative time was 150 min, with a warm ischemia time of 21 min. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Final resection technique according to the SIB score was pure enucleation for both masses. At histopathological analysis, both renal masses were clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (stage pT1bNxMx and pT3aNxMx for the larger and smaller mass, respectively). At a follow-up of 7 months, there was no evidence of local or systemic recurrence.Conclusions: Surgical management of complex renal masses in patients with HSKs is challenging and decision-making is highly nuanced. To optimize postoperative outcomes, proper surgical experience and careful preoperative planning are key. In this regard, 3D models can play a crucial role to refine patient counseling, surgical decision-making, and pre- and intraoperative planning during RAPN, tailoring surgical strategies and techniques according to the single patient's anatomy.

scholarly journals Development of a nomogram to predict achievement of trifecta outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy for cT1-2 renal tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. S125
Author(s):  
A. Brassetti ◽  
U. Anceschi ◽  
R. Bertolo ◽  
C. De Nunzio ◽  
G. Tuderti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

scholarly journals Three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors: an empirical analysis of 290 patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feiya Yang ◽  
Lianjie Mou ◽  
Nianzeng Xing
Keyword(s):  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Intraoperative Ultrasound ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A

Abstract Objective To explore the feasibility of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy(LPN) in the treatment of renal hilar tumors. Methods Clinical data of 290 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from January 2013 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including 27 patients with renal hilar tumors and 263 patients with non-hilar renal tumors. Perioperative data and follow-up results were compared between the two groups. Results Tumor size in Group A is smaller(2.97±0.88 vs 3.55±1.46,p<0.05), R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score of Group A is higher(8.4±1.3 vs 6.5±1.7,p<0.01).The operation time, WIT and intraoperative blood loss in the Group A were slightly higher, but with no statistical difference (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative ultrasound rate, collection system repair rate, drainage time,postoperative hospital stay, and eGFR changes (p>0.05).The median follow-up period was 40 months. One patient with postoperative pathologic report of angiomyolipoma was found tumor recurrence and was currently undergoing regular reexamination. Conclusion Three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal hilar tumors is safe and feasible after detailed preoperative evaluation of the tumor and selection of appropriate surgical strategies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document