scholarly journals Different HECT domain ubiquitin ligases employ distinct mechanisms of polyubiquitin chain synthesis

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 4324-4333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Wang ◽  
Cecile M Pickart
2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 3307-3318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung Cheol Kim ◽  
Jon M. Huibregtse

ABSTRACT Polyubiquitination can mediate several different biochemical functions, determined in part by which lysine of ubiquitin is used to link the polyubiquitin chain. Among the HECT domain ubiquitin ligases, some, such as human E6AP, preferentially catalyze the formation of K48-linked polyubiquitin chains, while others, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rsp5 and human Itch, preferentially catalyze the formation of K63-linked chains. The features of HECT E3s that determine their chain type specificities have not been identified. We show here that chain type specificity is a function solely of the Rsp5 HECT domain, that the identity of the cooperating E2 protein does not influence the chain type specificity, that single chains produced by Rsp5 contain between 12 and 30 ubiquitin moieties, and that the determinants of chain type specificity are located within the last 60 amino acids of the C lobe of the HECT domain. Our results are also consistent with a simple sequential-addition mechanism for polyubiquitination by Rsp5, rather than a mechanism involving the formation of either E2- or E3-linked polyubiquitin chain transfers.


2011 ◽  
Vol 405 (4) ◽  
pp. 662-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall C. Wilson ◽  
Stephen P. Edmondson ◽  
Justin W. Flatt ◽  
Kimberli Helms ◽  
Pamela D. Twigg

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenza Simona Delvecchio ◽  
Claudia Fierro ◽  
Sara Giovannini ◽  
Gerry Melino ◽  
Francesca Bernassola

AbstractUbiquitination-mediated proteolysis or regulation of proteins, ultimately executed by E3 ubiquitin ligases, control a wide array of cellular processes, including transcription, cell cycle, autophagy and apoptotic cell death. HECT-type E3 ubiquitin ligases can be distinguished from other subfamilies of E3 ubiquitin ligases because they have a C-terminal HECT domain that directly catalyzes the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to their substrate proteins. Deregulation of HECT-type E3-mediated ubiquitination plays a prominent role in cancer development and chemoresistance. Several members of this subfamily are indeed frequently deregulated in human cancers as a result of genetic mutations and altered expression or activity. HECT-type E3s contribute to tumorigenesis by regulating the ubiquitination rate of substrates that function as either tumour suppressors or oncogenes. While the pathological roles of the HECT family members in solid tumors are quite well established, their contribution to the pathogenesis of hematological malignancies has only recently emerged. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the involvement of the HECT-type E3s in leukemogenesis.


EMBO Reports ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mund ◽  
Hugh R B Pelham

Biochemistry ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (27) ◽  
pp. 9784-9792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy D. Mastrandrea ◽  
Eileen M. Kasperek ◽  
Edward G. Niles ◽  
Cecile M. Pickart

2005 ◽  
Vol 280 (23) ◽  
pp. 22115-22123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Morén ◽  
Takeshi Imamura ◽  
Kohei Miyazono ◽  
Carl-Henrik Heldin ◽  
Aristidis Moustakas

Smad4 mediates signaling by the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily of cytokines. Smad signaling is negatively regulated by inhibitory (I) Smads and ubiquitin-mediated processes. Known mechanisms of proteasomal degradation of Smads depend on the direct interaction of specific E3 ligases with Smads. Alternatively, I-Smads elicit degradation of the TGF-β receptor by recruiting the WW and HECT domain E3 ligases, Smurfs, WWP1, or NEDD4–2. We describe an equivalent mechanism of degradation of Smad4 by the above E3 ligases, via formation of ternary complexes between Smad4 and Smurfs, mediated by R-Smads (Smad2) or I-Smads (Smad6/7), acting as adaptors. Smurfs, which otherwise cannot directly bind to Smad4, mediated poly-ubiquitination of Smad4 in the presence of Smad6 or Smad7. Smad4 co-localized with Smad7 and Smurf1 primarily in the cytoplasm and in peripheral cell protrusions. Smad2 or Smad7 mutants defective in Smad4 interaction failed to induce Smurf1-mediated down-regulation of Smad4. A Smad4 mutant defective in Smad2 or Smad7 interaction could not be effectively down-regulated by Smurf1. We propose that Smad4 is targeted for degradation by multiple ubiquitin ligases that can simultaneously act on R-Smads and signaling receptors. Such mechanisms of down-regulation of TGF-β signaling may be critical for proper physiological response to this pathway.


2017 ◽  
Vol 292 (25) ◽  
pp. 10398-10413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. French ◽  
Julian L. Klosowiak ◽  
Aaron Aslanian ◽  
Steven I. Reed ◽  
John R. Yates ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document