Second generation BtL type biofuels – a production cost analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 8445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Haarlemmer ◽  
Guillaume Boissonnet ◽  
Juliette Imbach ◽  
Pierre-Alexandre Setier ◽  
Emanuela Peduzzi
GM Crops ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Ávila Méndez ◽  
Alejandro Chaparro Giraldo ◽  
Giovanni Reyes Moreno ◽  
Carlos Silva Castro

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2264
Author(s):  
Ahmed E. Tourab ◽  
Ana María Blanco-Marigorta ◽  
Aly M. Elharidi ◽  
María José Suárez-López

In this paper, an experimental and theoretical investigation is performed on a novel water desalination system based on a humidification–dehumidification technique using a heat pump. An ultrasonic water atomizer is used in the humidification process in order to improve the humidification system. In addition to that, a new configuration is employed in the humidification process (hybrid atomization system), which combines the traditional spraying atomization system and the ultrasonic water atomizer. The new humidification system performance is investigated and compared with the spraying water atomizer system in terms of humidification effectiveness and freshwater productivity. The results show that the ultrasonic water atomizer has enhanced and improved humidification effectiveness, and consequently, the productivity of freshwater. The maximum humidification effectiveness and productivity achieved by the ultrasonic water atomizer are 94.9% and 4.9 kg/h, respectively, meaning an increase of 25.2% and 18.8%, compared to the traditional spraying atomization system. The hybrid system increases humidification effectiveness and productivity by 3.8% and 8.2%, respectively, in comparison with the stand-alone ultrasonic water atomizer. A cost analysis was also carried out in this paper in order to perform an economic comparison of different humidification processes (spraying, ultrasonic; and hybrid atomization systems). The minimum production cost of one liter of freshwater amounts to $0.0311 with the spraying system, $0.0251 with the ultrasonic system, and $0.0250 with the hybrid atomization system. These results reveal the profitability of the new configuration.


2012 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 809-813
Author(s):  
Jun Guo ◽  
De Qing Gan ◽  
Jing Tan ◽  
Xu Long Yao

Through OLAP technology study and solve the data issues during the real-time integrated of cost information process. Using OLAP technology does classified and sequenced analyses on mines production cost multi-dimensionally and multi-angle computationally. It is carried the deep study that the application of OLAP theory and technology in underground metal mines cost analysis field, and meanwhile the relative OLAP modeling is put forward.


1984 ◽  
Vol PER-4 (8) ◽  
pp. 57-57
Author(s):  
A. L. Desell ◽  
E. C. McClelland ◽  
K. Tammar ◽  
P. R. Van Horne

2021 ◽  
Vol 1195 (1) ◽  
pp. 012018
Author(s):  
J Y Lai ◽  
L H Ngu

Abstract Activated carbon (AC) is an established adsorbent for organic pollutants reduction, metal removal, and liquid and gas adsorption. Cost analysis corresponds to determining the best approach for AC production depending on activation techniques with different degrees of activation is still minimal in literature. A cost estimation of AC production in laboratory scale using different conventional activation and post-activation surface modification process is performed in this study. This study attempts to develop a cost-friendly selection of activation process from laboratory scale prices. Chemicals and utility costs were acquired from vendor quotes (i.e., Sigma-Aldrich and Fisher Scientific) and Sarawak industrial electricity tariffs based on 100 g production. Oil palm-based ACs produced from five different activation or surface modification methods were compared to ascertain the least expensive production approach in terms of estimated production cost. Of the five methods investigated, method that quoted the least expensive production cost is chemical activation using potassium hydroxide (KOH) with minimum estimated cost of $7.30 whereas the most expensive production cost involves surface modification by polyethyleneimine (PEI) impregnation with cost of $873.00. Therefore, the estimated production cost for KOH activation is the minimum at $0.073 g−1 while the maximum is $8.73 g−1 for PEI impregnation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
B. Petrovic ◽  
R. Pokluda ◽  
C. Richard ◽  
K. Fonteno

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document