Discovering potential cancer driver genes by an integrated network-based approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2921-2931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Shi ◽  
Lin Gao ◽  
Bingbo Wang

An integrated network-based approach is proposed to nominate driver genes. It is composed of two steps including a network diffusion step and an aggregated ranking step, which fuses the correlation between the gene mutations and gene expression, the relationship between the mutated genes and the heterogeneous characteristic of the patient mutation.

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 3114-3126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genee Y. Lee ◽  
Peter M. Haverty ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Noelyn M. Kljavin ◽  
Richard Bourgon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Zhang ◽  
Yannan Bin

Identification of driver genes from mass non-functional passenger genes in cancers is still a critical challenge. Here, an effective and no parameter algorithm, named DriverSubNet, is presented for detecting driver genes by effectively mining the mutation and gene expression information based on subnetwork enrichment analysis. Compared with the existing classic methods, DriverSubNet can rank driver genes and filter out passenger genes more efficiently in terms of precision, recall, and F1 score, as indicated by the analysis of four cancer datasets. The method recovered about 50% more known cancer driver genes in the top 100 detected genes than those found in other algorithms. Intriguingly, DriverSubNet was able to find these unknown cancer driver genes which could act as potential therapeutic targets and useful prognostic biomarkers for cancer patients. Therefore, DriverSubNet may act as a useful tool for the identification of driver genes by subnetwork enrichment analysis.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (50) ◽  
pp. 14330-14335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin J. Tokheim ◽  
Nickolas Papadopoulos ◽  
Kenneth W. Kinzler ◽  
Bert Vogelstein ◽  
Rachel Karchin

Sequencing has identified millions of somatic mutations in human cancers, but distinguishing cancer driver genes remains a major challenge. Numerous methods have been developed to identify driver genes, but evaluation of the performance of these methods is hindered by the lack of a gold standard, that is, bona fide driver gene mutations. Here, we establish an evaluation framework that can be applied to driver gene prediction methods. We used this framework to compare the performance of eight such methods. One of these methods, described here, incorporated a machine-learning–based ratiometric approach. We show that the driver genes predicted by each of the eight methods vary widely. Moreover, the P values reported by several of the methods were inconsistent with the uniform values expected, thus calling into question the assumptions that were used to generate them. Finally, we evaluated the potential effects of unexplained variability in mutation rates on false-positive driver gene predictions. Our analysis points to the strengths and weaknesses of each of the currently available methods and offers guidance for improving them in the future.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Chen ◽  
Jingjing Hao ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Tong He ◽  
Xuegong Zhang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ege Ülgen ◽  
O. Uğur Sezerman

Abstract Background Cancer develops due to “driver” alterations. Numerous approaches exist for predicting cancer drivers from cohort-scale genomics data. However, methods for personalized analysis of driver genes are underdeveloped. In this study, we developed a novel personalized/batch analysis approach for driver gene prioritization utilizing somatic genomics data, called driveR. Results Combining genomics information and prior biological knowledge, driveR accurately prioritizes cancer driver genes via a multi-task learning model. Testing on 28 different datasets, this study demonstrates that driveR performs adequately, achieving a median AUC of 0.684 (range 0.651–0.861) on the 28 batch analysis test datasets, and a median AUC of 0.773 (range 0–1) on the 5157 personalized analysis test samples. Moreover, it outperforms existing approaches, achieving a significantly higher median AUC than all of MutSigCV (Wilcoxon rank-sum test p < 0.001), DriverNet (p < 0.001), OncodriveFML (p < 0.001) and MutPanning (p < 0.001) on batch analysis test datasets, and a significantly higher median AUC than DawnRank (p < 0.001) and PRODIGY (p < 0.001) on personalized analysis datasets. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the proposed method is an accurate and easy-to-utilize approach for prioritizing driver genes in cancer genomes in personalized or batch analyses. driveR is available on CRAN: https://cran.r-project.org/package=driveR.


EBioMedicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 156-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magali Champion ◽  
Kevin Brennan ◽  
Tom Croonenborghs ◽  
Andrew J. Gentles ◽  
Nathalie Pochet ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document