A dynamic passive thermoregulation fabric using metallic microparticles

Nanoscale ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muluneh G. Abebe ◽  
Gilles Rosolen ◽  
Jeremy Odent ◽  
Jean-Marie Raquez ◽  
Bjorn Maes

Maintaining comfort using photonic thermal management textiles has a large potential to decrease the energy cost for heating and cooling in residential and office buildings. We propose a thermoregulating fabric...

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Luo ◽  
Yining Zhu ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Ziquan Xu ◽  
Yu Hong ◽  
...  

Abstract Enhancing the personal thermal comfort in outdoor environment is of substantial significance to ameliorate the health conditions of pedestrian and outdoor laborer. However, the uncontrollable sunlight, substantial radiative loss, and intense temperature change in the outdoor environment present majestic challenges to outdoor personal thermal management. To date, a wearable device with optional passive heating and cooling abilities to abet people combat extreme temperatures in outdoor spaces, is lacking. Here, we report an eco-friendly passive textile which converts the challenges into opportunities and harvests energy from the sun and the outer space for optional localized heating and cooling. Compared to conventional heating/cooling textiles like black/white cotton, its heating/cooling mode enables a skin simulator temperature increase/decrease of 11.3 ℃/14.5 ℃ respectively under sunlight exposure. Meanwhile, the temperature gradient created between the textile and skin simulator allows a continuous electricity generation with thermoelectric modules. Owing to the exceptional outdoor thermoregulation ability, this Janus textile is promising to help maintain a comfortable microclimate for individuals in outdoor environment and provide a platform for pervasive power generation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Dong ◽  
Xue Cui ◽  
Xunzhi Yin ◽  
Yang Chen ◽  
Haibo Guo

This research evaluates the operational heating and cooling energy consumption of cross-laminated timber (CLT) office buildings in China. The evaluations involve a comparison of the energy consumption of a reference RC structure and CLT system office buildings. Computational simulation results are based on IES-VE 2019 and show that the estimated heating energy saving ratio of CLT buildings in Harbin, Beijing, Shanghai, and Kunming to the reference structure are 11.97%, 22.11%, 30.94%, and 23.30% respectively. However, the CLT buildings consume more energy for cooling in the summer. The results of the research show significantly higher heating energy reductions for CLT buildings in the Cold Region and Severe Cold Regions of China. Thus, the application of the CLT system is better suited to northern China than southern China. The results of the research can be used in further assessment of the use of CLT systems in different climatic regions in China.


Energies ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 6658-6671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung-Lip Ahn ◽  
Ji-Woo Park ◽  
Seunghwan Yoo ◽  
Jonghun Kim ◽  
Seung-Bok Leigh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Swapan Saha ◽  
Dharma Hagare ◽  
Jiaqi Zhou ◽  
Md Kamrul Hassan

Space cooling and heating in residential sector is significant contributor to energy consumption in Australia. Therefore, it is important to reduce the cooling and heating requirements. The selection of a good walling system helps to save energy by homes. This research compared the thermal efficiency of a modern house (constructed using brick veneer walls with concrete floor slab) with an old house (constructed using fibro cement walls raised timber floor) using the AccuRate simulation tool. A standard house with two living rooms, one kitchen, one laundry and four bedrooms are simulated in a Sydney Suburb in Australia. It was found that modern house showed lower inside temperature variation than the old house all year around. The results also showed that the modern house has a lower energy consumption for space heating and cooling than the old house. The annual energy use for space heating and cooling in both the modern house and old house were 5197 kWh and 15,712 kWh respectively. Moreover, the annual energy costs were found to be $1,403 and $4,242 respectively for modern and old houses. The modern brick veneer house saved about 33 % of energy compared to old old house. When the net present value of the energy cost for f both houses over 50 years is computed, the energy cost of modern house was found to be $25,629 while it of old house is was $77,488 for the old house.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document