Sphingosine 1-phosphate signalling in mammalian cells

2000 ◽  
Vol 349 (2) ◽  
pp. 385-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan PYNE ◽  
Nigel J. PYNE

Sphingosine 1-phosphate is formed in cells in response to diverse stimuli, including growth factors, cytokines, G-protein-coupled receptor agonists, antigen, etc. Its production is catalysed by sphingosine kinase, while degradation is either via cleavage to produce palmitaldehyde and phosphoethanolamine or by dephosphorylation. In this review we discuss the most recent advances in our understanding of the role of the enzymes involved in metabolism of this lysolipid. Sphingosine 1-phoshate can also bind to members of the endothelial differentiation gene (EDG) G-protein-coupled receptor family [namely EDG1, EDG3, EDG5 (also known as H218 or AGR16), EDG6 and EDG8] to elicit biological responses. These receptors are coupled differentially via Gi, Gq, G12/13 and Rho to multiple effector systems, including adenylate cyclase, phospholipases C and D, extracellular-signal-regulated kinase, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and non-receptor tyrosine kinases. These signalling pathways are linked to transcription factor activation, cytoskeletal proteins, adhesion molecule expression, caspase activities, etc. Therefore sphingosine 1-phosphate can affect diverse biological responses, including mitogenesis, differentiation, migration and apoptosis, via receptor-dependent mechanisms. Additionally, sphingosine 1-phosphate has been proposed to play an intracellular role, for example in Ca2+ mobilization, activation of non-receptor tyrosine kinases, inhibition of caspases, etc. We review the evidence for both intracellular and extracellular actions, and extensively discuss future approaches that will ultimately resolve the question of dual action. Certainly, sphingosine 1-phosphate will prove to be unique if it elicits both extra- and intra-cellular actions. Finally, we review the evidence that implicates sphingosine 1-phosphate in pathophysiological disease states, such as cancer, angiogenesis and inflammation. Thus there is a need for the development of new therapeutic compounds, such as receptor antagonists. However, identification of the most suitable targets for drug intervention requires a full understanding of the signalling and action profile of this lysosphingolipid. This article describes where the research field is in relation to achieving this aim.

2000 ◽  
Vol 275 (42) ◽  
pp. 32603-32610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Schmidt ◽  
Markus Frings ◽  
Marie-Luise Mono ◽  
Yuanjian Guo ◽  
Paschal A. Oude Weernink ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 648 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Adolfo García-Sáinz ◽  
M. Teresa Romero-Ávila ◽  
Luz del Carmen Medina

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrica Marmonti ◽  
Hannah Savage ◽  
Aiqian Zhang ◽  
Claudia Alvarez ◽  
Miriam Morrell ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTTumor vasculature is innately dysfunctional. Poorly functional tumor vessels inefficiently deliver chemotherapy to tumor cells; vessel hyper-permeability promotes chemotherapy delivery primarily to a tumor’s periphery. Here we identify a method for enhancing chemotherapy delivery and efficacy in Ewing sarcoma (ES) in mice by modulating tumor vessel permeability. Vessel permeability is partially controlled by the G protein-coupled Sphinosine-1-phosphate receptors 1 and 2 (S1PR1 and S1PR2) on endothelial cells. S1PR1 promotes endothelial cell junction integrity while S1PR2 destabilizes it. We hypothesize that an imbalance of S1PR1:S1PR2 is partially responsible for the dysfunctional vascular phenotype characteristic of ES and that by altering the balance in favor of S1PR1, ES vessel hyper-permeability can be reversed. In this study, we demonstrate that pharmacologic activation of S1PR1 by SEW2871 or inhibition of S1PR2 by JTE-013 caused more organized, mature, and functional tumor vessels. Importantly, S1PR1 activation or S1PR2 inhibition improved chemotherapy delivery to the tumor and anti-tumor efficacy. Our data suggests that pharmacologic targeting of S1PR1 and S1PR2 may be a useful adjuvant to standard chemotherapy for ES patients.NOVELTY AND IMPACTThis study demonstrates that Sphingosine-1-Phosphate (S1P) receptors are potential novel targets for tumor vasculature remodeling and adjuvant therapy for the treatment of Ewing Sarcoma. Unlike receptor tyrosine kinases that have already been extensively evaluated for use as vascular normalizing agents in oncology, S1P receptors are G protein-coupled receptors, which have not been well studied in tumor endothelium. Pharmacologic activators and inhibitors of S1P receptors are currently in clinical trials for treatment of auto-immune and cardiovascular diseases, indicating potential for clinical translation of this work.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (52) ◽  
pp. 18494-18507
Author(s):  
Kelly Karl ◽  
Michael D. Paul ◽  
Elena B. Pasquale ◽  
Kalina Hristova

Ligand bias is the ability of ligands to differentially activate certain receptor signaling responses compared with others. It reflects differences in the responses of a receptor to specific ligands and has implications for the development of highly specific therapeutics. Whereas ligand bias has been studied primarily for G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), there are also reports of ligand bias for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). However, the understanding of RTK ligand bias is lagging behind the knowledge of GPCR ligand bias. In this review, we highlight how protocols that were developed to study GPCR signaling can be used to identify and quantify RTK ligand bias. We also introduce an operational model that can provide insights into the biophysical basis of RTK activation and ligand bias. Finally, we discuss possible mechanisms underpinning RTK ligand bias. Thus, this review serves as a primer for researchers interested in investigating ligand bias in RTK signaling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document