Effects of Intravenous Labetalol on Blood Pressure, Angiotensin II and Aldosterone in Hypertension: Comparison with Propranolol

1976 ◽  
Vol 51 (s3) ◽  
pp. 497s-499s ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Rosei ◽  
P. M. Trust ◽  
J. J. Brown ◽  
R. Fraser ◽  
A. F. Lever ◽  
...  

1. Labetalol, a compound with both α- and β-adrenoreceptor-blocking actions, was given intravenously (1·5–2·0 mg/kg) in twenty recumbent hypertensive patients. 2. There was a rapid reduction in systolic and diastolic pressures in all, maintained up to 24 h in some subjects. 3. Severe hypotension was not seen in recumbent subjects, but postural hypotension was common. 4. Labetalol caused significant lowering of heart rate. 5. Labetalol induced significant and related lowering of plasma angiotensin II and aldosterone concentrations, most obviously when these were initially high. 6. In a cross-over comparison in five patients against 10 mg of propranolol intravenously, labetalol was more effective in lowering blood pressure, but less effective in lowering pulse rate or plasma angiotensin II.

1976 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Verniory ◽  
M. Staroukine ◽  
F. Delwiche ◽  
M. Telerman

1. Twenty-three hypertensive patients were treated by sotalol, a pure beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent. The drug produced a significant decrease of blood pressure in nineteen patients. 2. On average, cardiac index decreased but not significantly; heart rate decreased and stroke index increased significantly. Total peripheral resistance varied in both directions. 3. Sotalol determined a fall in plasma renin concentration (only significant in the high-renin group), a fall in plasma angiotensin II concentration and in urinary excretion rate of aldosterone accompanied by a rise in plasma potassium concentration. 4. The fall of blood pressure was not correlated with the decreases of renin and angiotensin II concentrations or excretion rate of aldosterone. However, in the placebo period plasma angiotensin II concentration was significantly correlated with total peripheral resistance; during sotalol treatment the variations of these two parameters seemed also to be correlated. 5. There was a poor correlation between decreases of cardiac output and of blood pressure; it was impossible to foresee the magnitude of the lowering of the blood pressure from the initial cardiac index. 6. The association of a diuretic with sotalol enhanced the hypotensive effect of the beta-receptor blocking drug, without significant increase of plasma renin and angiotensin II concentrations.


1992 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 549-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. MacFadyen ◽  
M. Tree ◽  
A. F. Lever ◽  
J. L. Reid

1. The blood pressure, heart rate, hormonal and pressor responses to constant rate infusion of various doses of the angiotensin (type 1) receptor antagonist Losartan (DuP 753/MK 954) were studied in the conscious salt-deplete dog. 2. Doses in the range 0.1–3 μmin−1 kg−1 caused no change in blood pressure, heart rate or pressor response to angiotensin II (54 ng min−1kg−1), and a dose of 10 μgmin−1 kg−1 had no effect on blood pressure, but caused a small fall in the pressor response to angiotensin II. Infusion of Losartan at 30 μmin−1 kg−1 for 3 h caused a fall in mean blood arterial pressure from baseline (110.9 ± 11.2 to 95.0 ± 12.8 mmHg) and a rise in heart rate (from 84.6 ± 15.1 to 103 ± 15.2 beats/min). Baseline plasma angiotensin II (42.5 ± 11.8 pg/ml) and renin (64.5 ± 92.7 μ-units/ml) concentrations were already elevated in response to salt depletion and rose significantly after Losartan infusion to reach a plateau by 70 min. The rise in mean arterial blood pressure after a test infusion of angiotensin II (35.3 ± 11.6 mmHg) was reduced at 15 min (11.8 ± 6.8 mmHg) by Losartan and fell progressively with continued infusion (3 h, 4.3 ± 3.3 mmHg). The peak plasma angiotensin II concentration during infusion of angiotensin II was unaffected by Losartan, but the rise in plasma angiotensin II concentration during infusion was reduced because of the elevated background concentration. Noradrenaline infusion caused a dose-related rise in mean blood arterial pressure (1000 ngmin−1kg−1, +19.9 ± 8 mmHg; 2000ngmin−1 kg−1, +52.8 ± 13.9 mmHg) with a fall in heart rate (1000 ng min−1 kg−1, −27.9 ± 11.5 beats/min; 2000 ng min−1 kg−1, −31.2 ± 17.3 beats/min). During Losartan infusion the 1000 but not the 2000 ng min−1 kg−1 noradrenaline infusion caused a greater rise in mean arterial blood pressure and a greater fall in heart rate. The fall in heart rate tended to decrease with continued infusion of Losartan. Plasma catecholamine concentrations were unaffected by Losartan. In a further study, higher doses of Losartan (100, 300 and 1000 μg min−1 kg−1; 30 min) produced greater falls in mean arterial blood pressure also with a rise in heart rate and complete blockade of the pressor effect of infused angiotensin II. Some animals became disturbed at the highest dose. 3. Losartan produces rapid dose-related falls in blood pressure and a rise in heart rate and renin release with elevation of plasma angiotensin II. Pressor responses to angiotensin II are reduced at intermediate doses and are eliminated at high doses. Losartan does not appear to inhibit angiotensin II clearance from the plasma and may in some way increase it.


1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (s5) ◽  
pp. 149s-152s ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Morganti ◽  
T. G. Pickering ◽  
J. Lopez-Ovejero ◽  
J. H. Laragh

1. To evaluate the effects of converting-enzyme inhibition on the sympathetic nervous system, on renin and on the other known regulators of aldosterone secretion, we measured blood pressure, heart rate, plasma noradrenaline, adrenaline, renin activity, aldosterone, cortisol and serum potassium in 15 sodium-repleted hypertensive patients in supine position and during 30 min of 65° head-up tilt before and during treatment with SQ 14 225. 2. SQ 14 225 produced significant decreases in supine blood pressure and plasma aldosterone and significant increments in plasma renin activity and potassium; in contrast, heart rate, noradrenaline, adrenaline and cortisol were unchanged. 3. While in control tilt studies blood pressure was always maintained, during treatment three of 15 patients had vasovagal syncopes. In the remaining 12 blood pressure was maintained during tilt on SQ 14 225; however, while the tilt-induced responses in heart rate and adrenaline were as in control studies, the 30 min increments in noradrenaline were significantly higher. 4. Both before and during treatment the responses of plasma renin activity and aldosterone to tilt were parallel, and correlated with each other, and cortisol and potassium changed only slightly. 5. It is concluded that the SQ 14 225-induced fall in blood pressure occurs without a concomitant rise in sympathetic nervous activity; thus the increase in supine plasma renin activity, being a reflection of the interruption of the angiotensin feedback mechanism on renin release, indicates an effective suppression of angiotensin II formation. 6. During SQ 14 225 the persistence of aldosterone response to tilt and its relationship with renin activity suggest that the enzymatic blockade is over-ridden; however, in the presence of a reduced formation of angiotensin II a more pronounced response of the sympathetic nervous system is required to defend blood pressure against postural changes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Mejía-Mejía ◽  
James M. May ◽  
Mohamed Elgendi ◽  
Panayiotis A. Kyriacou

AbstractHeart rate variability (HRV) utilizes the electrocardiogram (ECG) and has been widely studied as a non-invasive indicator of cardiac autonomic activity. Pulse rate variability (PRV) utilizes photoplethysmography (PPG) and recently has been used as a surrogate for HRV. Several studies have found that PRV is not entirely valid as an estimation of HRV and that several physiological factors, including the pulse transit time (PTT) and blood pressure (BP) changes, may affect PRV differently than HRV. This study aimed to assess the relationship between PRV and HRV under different BP states: hypotension, normotension, and hypertension. Using the MIMIC III database, 5 min segments of PPG and ECG signals were used to extract PRV and HRV, respectively. Several time-domain, frequency-domain, and nonlinear indices were obtained from these signals. Bland–Altman analysis, correlation analysis, and Friedman rank sum tests were used to compare HRV and PRV in each state, and PRV and HRV indices were compared among BP states using Kruskal–Wallis tests. The findings indicated that there were differences between PRV and HRV, especially in short-term and nonlinear indices, and although PRV and HRV were altered in a similar manner when there was a change in BP, PRV seemed to be more sensitive to these changes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document